Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › DAC1 HDR vs. DA11
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

DAC1 HDR vs. DA11 - Page 2

post #16 of 35

Damn that Lavry looks ugly. lol!

post #17 of 35

Beauty is in  the eye of the beholder my friend. For those who like form to be faithful to function the Lavry is voluptuous. Personally however i prefer the Benchmark styling.   

post #18 of 35

I thought you might like to be aware in your comparing that a source can be instantly likeable if it has a bright and shiny kind of sound.  After a few months that can just become very tiring like a glittering blonde. So try not to be dazzled but listen for the source that reveals both the details and the heart of the music while leaving you wanting to hear more because you feel refreshed.

 

In previous models the Benchmark was bright  and "etched" and the Lavry DA10 was rich. I havent heard the newer DAC models you have on trial so please post up your finding for us.

 

Have you had any luck in getting a HiFace so you can do a reliable comparison?

post #19 of 35
Thread Starter 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nada View Post

I thought you might like to be aware in your comparing that a source can be instantly likeable if it has a bright and shiny kind of sound.  After a few months that can just become very tiring like a glittering blonde. So try not to be dazzled but listen for the source that reveals both the details and the heart of the music while leaving you wanting to hear more because you feel refreshed.

 

In previous models the Benchmark was bright  and "etched" and the Lavry DA10 was rich. I havent heard the newer DAC models you have on trial so please post up your finding for us.

 

Have you had any luck in getting a HiFace so you can do a reliable comparison?


Very good points!  My evaluation continues, but I have not yet made a final decision.  A flaw in my testing is that I do not currently own a really stellar set of cans.  However, the Sony 7509HD are decent and very revealing.

 

Here are some of my current impressions (USB/DAC/AMP combo):

 

- DA11 sounds authentic and real.  Allows me to "see into" the music more than I ever have.  Very detailed and very engaging.  Seems to be built well, but not much to look at.  The PiC feature is kind of neat.  One major quirk is that interruptions in the USB data stream with hi-rez 24/96 files puts the unit into a mode where music stops and instead I get loud static/screeching until I stop playback.  This can be brought on by clicking windows in applications, etc.  Not so good for multitasking!  Normal 16/44 files are not a problem - just get barely audible clicks.  Could be my particular USB implementation.  I have informed Lavry tech support.

 

- DAC1 HDR sounds in comparison warm, rounded, twangy.  Deeper extension.  I would NOT call it bright or thin.  My observation here differs from almost everything I have read about the "DAC1" unit.  I don't prefer this sound for most of my music.  Very attractive little unit - I want to stare at it all day and touch it.  Runs warm even in standby.  Easy to operate with lots of attention to design and inputs/outputs.  Where the DA11 screeches as described above, the HDR gracefully mutes itself, which is far superior.

 

If the Lavry sound was coming out of the Benchmark the decision would be a no-brainer!

 

With my other cans, Yamaha YH-1, there is less difference between the two DACs.  I don't know if I should attribute this to the significantly different impedance and sensitivity of the cans, or to the fact that the YH-1 is simply less revealing than the 7509HD.

 

Those are just some initial thoughts.  Evaluation continues.  I might try to get a proper set of cans, and maybe a hiface, but that really defeats the purpose of a USB DAC.  I do plan to extend my testing with the help of my Oppo BDP-83 and its digital outputs.

 

BK


 


Edited by BK_856er - 5/12/10 at 7:50pm
post #20 of 35

Thanks for you impressions and the photos. Out of curiosity are you using the Wasapi plugin or direct sound? Wasapi can sometimes be whimsical with windows opening and closing or changing sampling frequencies. With a proper setting, DS can do a bit-perfect output.

Anyway, when using Wasapi, the first thing I'd recommend is to have only foobar set up to output through the Lavry, all other sounds should go through the integrated chipset of your computer.

post #21 of 35
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by khaos974 View Post

Thanks for you impressions and the photos. Out of curiosity are you using the Wasapi plugin or direct sound? Wasapi can sometimes be whimsical with windows opening and closing or changing sampling frequencies. With a proper setting, DS can do a bit-perfect output.

Anyway, when using Wasapi, the first thing I'd recommend is to have only foobar set up to output through the Lavry, all other sounds should go through the integrated chipset of your computer.



I'm using Windows XP + Fubar2000 1.0.3 set at 24bit ouput, and windows system sounds off.  I think that makes it DS.  I tried the KS addon, but it didn't work well with my ThinkPad T60 setup (I could get tracks to play, but not easily).

 

BK

post #22 of 35

WIndows sounds, other media players, youtube... should be set to output through the T60's motherboard.
Only Foobar should output through either the benchmark or the lavry, there's a tuturial on benchmark's website.

post #23 of 35

^ how to do that ?

post #24 of 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by shamu144 View Post



 

To me and many others, the HiFace offers far superior performance than through direct USB, and gives you up to 24/192 compatibility. Actually, I am a bit sad to see that companies like Benchmark or Lavry Eng. are not following the asynchronous USB trend and are sticking with adaptive USB, which I consider already a dead format.

 

I am no expert, but I believe KS is recommended for XP only (my set up), while WASAPI should be the choice for Vista/7...

 


The Benchmark is not adaptive, see here

 

http://www.benchmarkmedia.com/system1/digital-analog-converter/dac1-usb

 

post #25 of 35


Quote:

Originally Posted by Prog Rock Man View Post


The Benchmark is not adaptive, see here

 

http://www.benchmarkmedia.com/system1/digital-analog-converter/dac1-usb

 



How did you come to this conclusion  I see nothing indicating that the USB mode for the Benchmark is not adaptive.

post #26 of 35

From page 192 of the 'Benchmark DAC now available with USB' thread;

 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prog Rock Man View Post
could you also clear something up for me. Is the Benchmark solution to USB jitter synchronous, asynchronous or adaptive?
Benchmark's USB interface is synchronous, but the jitter attenuation technology is asynchronous.

All the best,
Elias

Elias Gwinn
Applications Engineer
Benchmark Media Systems, Inc 

post #27 of 35

Thanks BK for your impressions. Although you say you dont have great headphones the differences between these DACs seem very apparent to you, even with the USB implementation.

 

The DAC1 seems to have had a complete change in sound signature form the earlier models.

 

Thee HiFace should cure your USB woes and it will likely improve the sound quality in a cost efficient manner.

 

I think your hearing has already chosen the Lavry for you but your mind is still playing choosing games.

 

instead of the DA11  the Lavry DA10 and the HiFace together could sound better and still save some dollars.

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by BK_856er View Post

- DA11 sounds authentic and real.

 

- DAC1 HDR sounds in comparison warm, rounded, twangy.

post #28 of 35
Thread Starter 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nada View Post
 


Thanks, Nada.  I think you hit the nail on the head with the remark about the decision already being made by my ears, while my mind is still playing the choosing game.  So true I had to chuckle.

 

In the next few days I'm going to experiment with optical from an apple desktop, as well as coaxial from the Oppo, out to my cans and also my receiver, just to see what happens.

 

The DA10 + hiface suggestion is a logical and sensible one, but the flexibility of native USB is still important to me.

 

Another good suggestion earlier was to "pick one and enjoy the journey" because these are BOTH really nice units.

 

BK
 

post #29 of 35

Any decision yet?

post #30 of 35
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by USAudio View Post

Any decision yet?


I'm keeping the Lavry, but I have not yet been able to bring myself to send off the Benchmark.  I had no real issues with the DAC1 HDR, but I found myself reaching for the DA11 more often than not, which pretty much sums things up right there.  I extended my testing to the mac and optical inputs, etc.  Strangely, I found the differences between the two units be less than I originally noted with those setups.  I then did some additional critical A/B listening via USB on my main PC laptop and the gap between the two DACs seemed to have narrowed substantially.  My feeling was that after several weeks powered on, the HDR had improved somewhat and lost much of the rounded and twangy characteristic, whereas the DA11 remained the same.  In the end I let my ears make the decision and the DA11 was the winner.

 

BK

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Dedicated Source Components
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › DAC1 HDR vs. DA11