Damn that Lavry looks ugly. lol!
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Recent Reviews
-
Sennheiser HD-598s are the most comfortable headphones I've had the opportunity to use. I recommend these wholeheartedly for any first-time hi-fi buyer because of their excellent soundstage and...
-
I just received my SigPros (bought from a fellow head-fi'er), and now have several hours with them. They are great headphones. Agree with most of what everyone's saying about them. These...
-
Beats out the Bose Triport, the HD 202 and HD 435s, the AT M35 and AT M50. Just try it and see. Extremely comfortable (I wear mine while commuting and studying, for about 5+ hours a day). Bought...
-
I never thought it was possible for such rich sound from a headphone. Simply amazing headphones.
-
When I first put them on on I though that the highs will blow my head off. My ears got tired after 10 - 15 minutes. I though I would throw them out of the window. But having read some good...
Head-Fi Sponsors
DAC1 HDR vs. DA11 - Page 2
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder my friend. For those who like form to be faithful to function the Lavry is voluptuous. Personally however i prefer the Benchmark styling.
I thought you might like to be aware in your comparing that a source can be instantly likeable if it has a bright and shiny kind of sound. After a few months that can just become very tiring like a glittering blonde. So try not to be dazzled but listen for the source that reveals both the details and the heart of the music while leaving you wanting to hear more because you feel refreshed.
In previous models the Benchmark was bright and "etched" and the Lavry DA10 was rich. I havent heard the newer DAC models you have on trial so please post up your finding for us.
Have you had any luck in getting a HiFace so you can do a reliable comparison?
- BK_856er
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 232 Posts. Joined 11/2009
- Location: SF Bay Area
- Select All Posts By This User

I thought you might like to be aware in your comparing that a source can be instantly likeable if it has a bright and shiny kind of sound. After a few months that can just become very tiring like a glittering blonde. So try not to be dazzled but listen for the source that reveals both the details and the heart of the music while leaving you wanting to hear more because you feel refreshed.
In previous models the Benchmark was bright and "etched" and the Lavry DA10 was rich. I havent heard the newer DAC models you have on trial so please post up your finding for us.
Have you had any luck in getting a HiFace so you can do a reliable comparison?
Very good points! My evaluation continues, but I have not yet made a final decision. A flaw in my testing is that I do not currently own a really stellar set of cans. However, the Sony 7509HD are decent and very revealing.
Here are some of my current impressions (USB/DAC/AMP combo):
- DA11 sounds authentic and real. Allows me to "see into" the music more than I ever have. Very detailed and very engaging. Seems to be built well, but not much to look at. The PiC feature is kind of neat. One major quirk is that interruptions in the USB data stream with hi-rez 24/96 files puts the unit into a mode where music stops and instead I get loud static/screeching until I stop playback. This can be brought on by clicking windows in applications, etc. Not so good for multitasking! Normal 16/44 files are not a problem - just get barely audible clicks. Could be my particular USB implementation. I have informed Lavry tech support.
- DAC1 HDR sounds in comparison warm, rounded, twangy. Deeper extension. I would NOT call it bright or thin. My observation here differs from almost everything I have read about the "DAC1" unit. I don't prefer this sound for most of my music. Very attractive little unit - I want to stare at it all day and touch it. Runs warm even in standby. Easy to operate with lots of attention to design and inputs/outputs. Where the DA11 screeches as described above, the HDR gracefully mutes itself, which is far superior.
If the Lavry sound was coming out of the Benchmark the decision would be a no-brainer!
With my other cans, Yamaha YH-1, there is less difference between the two DACs. I don't know if I should attribute this to the significantly different impedance and sensitivity of the cans, or to the fact that the YH-1 is simply less revealing than the 7509HD.
Those are just some initial thoughts. Evaluation continues. I might try to get a proper set of cans, and maybe a hiface, but that really defeats the purpose of a USB DAC. I do plan to extend my testing with the help of my Oppo BDP-83 and its digital outputs.
BK
Edited by BK_856er - 5/12/10 at 7:50pm
- khaos974
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 2,072 Posts. Joined 3/2008
- Location: GMT +8
- Select All Posts By This User
Thanks for you impressions and the photos. Out of curiosity are you using the Wasapi plugin or direct sound? Wasapi can sometimes be whimsical with windows opening and closing or changing sampling frequencies. With a proper setting, DS can do a bit-perfect output.
Anyway, when using Wasapi, the first thing I'd recommend is to have only foobar set up to output through the Lavry, all other sounds should go through the integrated chipset of your computer.
- BK_856er
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 232 Posts. Joined 11/2009
- Location: SF Bay Area
- Select All Posts By This User

Thanks for you impressions and the photos. Out of curiosity are you using the Wasapi plugin or direct sound? Wasapi can sometimes be whimsical with windows opening and closing or changing sampling frequencies. With a proper setting, DS can do a bit-perfect output.
Anyway, when using Wasapi, the first thing I'd recommend is to have only foobar set up to output through the Lavry, all other sounds should go through the integrated chipset of your computer.
I'm using Windows XP + Fubar2000 1.0.3 set at 24bit ouput, and windows system sounds off. I think that makes it DS. I tried the KS addon, but it didn't work well with my ThinkPad T60 setup (I could get tracks to play, but not easily).
BK
- khaos974
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 2,072 Posts. Joined 3/2008
- Location: GMT +8
- Select All Posts By This User
WIndows sounds, other media players, youtube... should be set to output through the T60's motherboard.
Only Foobar should output through either the benchmark or the lavry, there's a tuturial on benchmark's website.
^ how to do that ?
- Prog Rock Man
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 3,801 Posts. Joined 7/2009
- Location: Scotland
- Select All Posts By This User

To me and many others, the HiFace offers far superior performance than through direct USB, and gives you up to 24/192 compatibility. Actually, I am a bit sad to see that companies like Benchmark or Lavry Eng. are not following the asynchronous USB trend and are sticking with adaptive USB, which I consider already a dead format.
I am no expert, but I believe KS is recommended for XP only (my set up), while WASAPI should be the choice for Vista/7...
The Benchmark is not adaptive, see here
http://www.benchmarkmedia.com/system1/digital-analog-converter/dac1-usb
Quote:
The Benchmark is not adaptive, see here
http://www.benchmarkmedia.com/system1/digital-analog-converter/dac1-usb
How did you come to this conclusion
I see nothing indicating that the USB mode for the Benchmark is not adaptive.
- Prog Rock Man
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 3,801 Posts. Joined 7/2009
- Location: Scotland
- Select All Posts By This User
From page 192 of the 'Benchmark DAC now available with USB' thread;
Elias Gwinn
Applications Engineer
Benchmark Media Systems, Inc
Thanks BK for your impressions. Although you say you dont have great headphones the differences between these DACs seem very apparent to you, even with the USB implementation.
The DAC1 seems to have had a complete change in sound signature form the earlier models.
Thee HiFace should cure your USB woes and it will likely improve the sound quality in a cost efficient manner.
I think your hearing has already chosen the Lavry for you but your mind is still playing choosing games.
instead of the DA11 the Lavry DA10 and the HiFace together could sound better and still save some dollars.
Quote:
- BK_856er
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 232 Posts. Joined 11/2009
- Location: SF Bay Area
- Select All Posts By This User
Thanks, Nada. I think you hit the nail on the head with the remark about the decision already being made by my ears, while my mind is still playing the choosing game. So true I had to chuckle.
In the next few days I'm going to experiment with optical from an apple desktop, as well as coaxial from the Oppo, out to my cans and also my receiver, just to see what happens.
The DA10 + hiface suggestion is a logical and sensible one, but the flexibility of native USB is still important to me.
Another good suggestion earlier was to "pick one and enjoy the journey" because these are BOTH really nice units.
BK
- USAudio
- Trader Feedback: +3
-
- offline
- 440 Posts. Joined 11/2007
- Location: Seattle, USA
- Select All Posts By This User
Any decision yet?
- BK_856er
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 232 Posts. Joined 11/2009
- Location: SF Bay Area
- Select All Posts By This User
I'm keeping the Lavry, but I have not yet been able to bring myself to send off the Benchmark. I had no real issues with the DAC1 HDR, but I found myself reaching for the DA11 more often than not, which pretty much sums things up right there. I extended my testing to the mac and optical inputs, etc. Strangely, I found the differences between the two units be less than I originally noted with those setups. I then did some additional critical A/B listening via USB on my main PC laptop and the gap between the two DACs seemed to have narrowed substantially. My feeling was that after several weeks powered on, the HDR had improved somewhat and lost much of the rounded and twangy characteristic, whereas the DA11 remained the same. In the end I let my ears make the decision and the DA11 was the winner.
BK
- DAC1 HDR vs. DA11
Recent Discussions
- › Portable on ear headphones that are comfy and arent Beats! AKG... 24 seconds ago
- › bad trader!! crap, i need help!!! 1 minute ago
- › A question about true balanced differential design signal paths. 2 minutes ago
- › Movie industry is destroying the physical format 2 minutes ago
- › Sony MDR MA 900 (new release from Sony) 4 minutes ago
- › Wadia 121 decoding computer 5 minutes ago
- › Review: Fischer Audio FA-003 - a neutral champ! 6 minutes ago
- › 「Official」Asian Anime, Manga, and Music Lounge 7 minutes ago
- › Sennheiser HD800 Appreciation Thread 8 minutes ago
- › FS: Grado RS-1 9 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › AKG K403 by eskimoo
- › Sennheiser HD-598 by TK277
- › Ultrasone Signature Pro Headphones by baglunch
- › JVC HA-S600 by pootispow
- › Audez'e LCD-2 Planar Magnetic Headphones by Squuiid
- › Superlux HD-668 B by BlackTea
- › Cowon C2-16BS 16 GB Video Player, Black with Silver by burninmind
- › BRAINWAVZ HM5 Studio Monitor Headphones by Night Crawler
- › Shure SE535LTD RED by sue4
- › Aurisonics AS-1b by Kunlun
New Articles
- › iBasso DX100 FAQ by DoctorHeadz
- › DIY Cable Info and Resources by Pingupenguins
- › Asr Head-Fi Threads Compendium by Asr
- › Headphone Buying Guide by keanex
- › Fostex T50RP modification summary LINKS - wiki by jgray91
- › Comparisons of the LCD-3 and the LCD-2 Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Posting Guidelines by Currawong
- › Comparisons of LCD-2 Rev. 1 and Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Membership Levels, Badges and Custom Titles by Currawong
- › Sennheiser Hd4 8 Modding For Newbies by koolkat
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map







