Recent Images In This Thread
Related Forum Threads
- Amp advice for a first-timer Last post on 10/27/11 at 1:37am in Headphone Amps (full-size)
- Great Portable/Desktop Amp and DAC/SoundCard for Sennheiser HD 558s Last post on 12/29/13 at 12:30pm in Introductions, Help and Recommendations
- Apogee Duet with custom break out cable Last post on 10/5/11 at 9:41am in Amplification For Sale / Trade
- TubeMagic D1 - Enough to drive Ortho's? Last post on 9/19/11 at 2:42pm in Headphone Amps (full-size)
- Amp for T70p - Price = 2-400 USD Last post on 12/4/11 at 1:59pm in Portable Headphone Amps
DIY Cable Info and Resources
Last edited: 10/2/13
- Hi End CablesLast edited: 1/8/12
You can pay more for a dac alone and not do as well as the 105. You can buy a blue ray player for more and not do as well. Ditto for cd, sacd, and/or DVD players. Its audio preamps are as good as...
The 2014 Brainwavz S5: A Single Dynamic Driver IEM Specifications Found here: www.yourbrainwavz.com/s5.html No measurements for the S5 were available at the time of this...
SO, lets get on to it. The MTPC's are a pair of IEM's that are in a very akward position. It is quite pricy and rejected by the "purist audiophiles" that dislike the brand of Monster, due to...
Got these headphones in blue limited edition and first of all, I must say that they look absolutely fantastic. Sexy in style and design. Not only that, the sound is amazing too! High, mid lows are...
As a precautionary remark: this is the first headphone review I have ever written - although I have read a lot of them; moreover these are the first pair of headphones I own in this price class,...
- Hi End Cables
Testing audiophile claims and myths - Page 128
Head-Fi's Best Sellers
Yes, that would be pretty safe to say.
The audio consultant Dick Pierce discovered that over a decade ago. He was testing some very well known & very expensive digital gear. It was so poorly designed that they would only work with some digital interconnects.
I remember that. Great guy. Though I always thought he should have stuck with "Richard."
Yeah? Glad to hear he's still kicking.
but considering the apparent audience here and their apparent lack of understanding, I could probably have published any formula and nobody who didn't already get it would know the difference anyway. Didn't seem worth the trouble and time, I'll re-consider next time.
You should, it's the only way to educate people who do not know it.
But as to all shouting numbers...um...I don't hear numbers coming from the mythology camp, ever. Because if they did make a claim like "standard cheapo wire produces an XdB roll off at Y-KHz" because of Z-effect, we'd just go prove them completely wrong simply and easily. No, the number-shouting only comes from people with proof, even if the algebra isn't shown, it's easy to check.
Everything you need to know is pretty much out there already, published, and possibly there's a web-based calculator that does most if not all of the job for you.
You know as well as I do that a believer will never bother to look up the algebra themselves. Which is why I feel it should be posted here, preferrably in a way that is easy to understand. Also stating "I use actual numbers while the other camp doesn't so I am right" is really pushing it
So, you take me to task for not publishingthe example, yet no problem with somebody who says "Oooh, watch out for the capacitance, or impedance (we never touched on that one..) as if that were fact too.
That is not the way I think about it (not sure how you got that from my post), on the contrary. Again, which is exactly why I feel the proper way to counter them is to not use their typical way of providing inaccurate unverifiable nonsense but instead hard scientific proof whenever possible.
As much as my lack of "proof" may have upset you, people posting comment without Googling the concept first annoys me too.
I got that
Yeah, thanks, you're right. I just got a little frustrated, my bad. Check my recent post over on the "If it graphs bad then it is bad" thread. See if you think I've done any better.
IMo the ability of science to account for the experience of life is very limited, I don't mean that it is useless or incorrect, but just limited in what it can predict. For me my direct experience comes first and foremost above a priorised mentally constructed determination of what my experience will be. Science enters to help make sense of what I directly perceive.
For example I just bought an HD800, and seller says look at the FR chart there is no 6Khz peak, and sure the FR plot provided shows no peak. But my ears tell me otherwise, so I look into it further and the FR plots made by Sennheiser are absolute rubbish. If I were to assume the evidence provided to me was absolute and reliable, and that my own observations are feeble and worthless I would still have sore ears. On the other hand objective measurements help to determine what might be causing what I was observing. Still other people might listen to e exact same headphone and be perfectly happy with them, even with all things being equal.
6 KHz sounds like a resonance in your ear. Read this http://www.head-fi.org/a/how-to-equalize-your-headphones-a-tutorial
Science wins again.
If the observation is not made under properly controlled conditions, then there is no evidence that it is true, and it could very well be false, even if it is the same for the majority. If you look at this picture,
do you trust your observation that B is a lighter shade of grey than A (especially after it is backed up by 10 out of 10 other people looking at it and also saying that B is lighter), or the measurement tool of the image editor that says that they are exactly the same ? What do you observe now, with the source of bias removed:
Initially counter clockwise and then clockwise after looking up the wiki page (but before reading the article, strangely)
Closest I could think to this sort of phenomenon in audio would be the illusion of stereo imaging. This is an interesting talk from the editor of Stereophile, as well as a cheeky dig at the opposition:
- Testing audiophile claims and myths
Head-Fi's Best Sellers
- › Centrance Hifi-M8 and Hifi-M8 LX (8 versions!) impressions thread 29 seconds ago
- › FS: Hifiman He-500 4 minutes ago
- › FS/T: Westone UM3X w/ One issue 4 minutes ago
- › iBasso DX90 Bug Thread - Post Any Firmware Bugs/Issues Here 5 minutes ago
- › thread for fun...do you see your hearing getting lost in the future? 6 minutes ago
- › 「Official」Asian Anime, Manga, and Music Lounge 8 minutes ago
- › WTB SONY XB90EX 9 minutes ago
- › Beyerdynamic DT770 Pro 80 ohms - Very good condition, modded 10 minutes ago
- › New to Full size headphones and need helpful advice on choosing a... 10 minutes ago
- › Multi-Custom In-Ear Monitor Review, Resource, Mfg List & Discussion... 10 minutes ago
- › OPPO BDP-105 Universal Audiophile 3D Blu-ray Player by professor825
- › Brainwavz S5 In Ear Headphones by NA Blur
- › Monster Turbine Pro Copper In-Ear Headphones by TurbinePro
- › Audio-Technica ATH-M50x by SMLeaves
- › Philips Fidelio L2 by wolfjeanne
- › Beyerdynamic DTX 350p Portable Headphones Brand New Black Free... by twister6
- › Sony MDR-CD 780 by mark235
- › EarSonics EM32 by Rollk2
- › JVC HA-FX101 by bonami2
- › Pioneer MASTER-1s by kuantings
- › Audio Connections between components --...
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Introduction)
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Over-Ear Headphones)
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Over-Ear Headphones) 2
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Over-Ear Headphones) 3
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (In-Ear Headphones)
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (In-Ear Headphones) 2
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (In-Ear Headphones) 3
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Gaming Headphones)
- › Head-Fi Buying Guide (Exercise Headphones)