Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › DIY (Do-It-Yourself) Discussions › Please explain RoHS...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Please explain RoHS...

post #1 of 9
Thread Starter 
Yes, I know how to google and use wikipedia. The Restriction of Hazardous Substances directive is fairly self-explanatory.

But I don't see why lead in things like resistors is such a hazard - at least, it shouldn't be, provided the rest of the system is functioning. Lead doesn't become airborne like asbestos (at least, I think it doesn't), and I don't know when the last time was that a little kid cracked open some electronics and started munching on resistors. Simply handling things like a PCB should not impart lead to a person. Possibly there are places where they are just grinding up old electronics into powder, there are really poor regulations so people start breathing in that powder and get poisoned? This is just an imagined example, but why not attack the lack of regulation - isn't that the real problem?

Wikipedia mentions that things are 'coming full circle' - we ship our old electronics to China for recycling, and then the heavy metals like lead and cadmium end up contaminating Chinese consumer products that reach our shores. Isn't that more a case of China or other countries not having their act together? I don't intend to attack China, I have nothing against them as a country or culture, but they have massively increased their industrialization in the last few decades, too quickly, and things like safety and QC have suffered...whether it's lead in children's toys, or their oil tankers spilling left and right (most recently in the Great Barrier Reef). It doesn't seem a forgone conclusion to me that lead in a discarded PCB should end up contaminating a children's toy. It seems like a major effort toward reorganization and regulation, and as a safeguard better quality control, would be a better idea than trying to eliminate lead from EVERYthing EVER.
post #2 of 9
I was wondering the same thing, and came up with the conclusion that it's for disposal safety. Electronics (especially computer components) become obsolete and must be discarded. Look up "e-waste" and you can see that it's no small issue. Making lead-free solder mandatory is one way to reduce toxic chemicals in landfills, garbage heaps, etc.

At least, that's one theory on why it's done.
post #3 of 9
There are far bigger fish to fry than going after the small electronics hi-fi manufacturer and their use of lead based solder. But that is my opinion.
post #4 of 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowpogo View Post
This is just an imagined example, but why not attack the lack of regulation - isn't that the real problem?
clearly you are not a politician, and accordingly didnt write ROHS

ROHS began in Europe around 10 years ago, and there are a bunch of articles about the perils of an ROHS society around on the web. It is quite unfortunate for consumers that lead has been unconditionally banned in many/most products. The ROHS guidelines actually admit their own weaknesses in allowing for exemption for military and nuclear power equipment. Unfortunately the relatively low demand for lead-containing parts and difficulties in retooling and cleaning equipment to conform to ROHS mean that very few parts actually use lead even when an exemption is granted.

Look into failure rates of lead-free soldered digital gear. consider the problems that could result from a control circuit (or sensor receiver, or whatever use your imagination.... murphy's law still works even though ROHS dosnt ) in a nuclear power plant failing. Armageddon will start with a sliver of tin 1micron wide, and 2mm long.

Although the arguments that lead containing products leach lead back into groundwater supplies are accurate, they do not take into account the really poor life-span of lead-free solders due to tin whisker formation. The better solution would be as you said to create an enforceable disposal program, but as can be seen in any evaluation of even aluminum or glass recycling this simply dosnt work.

On a related note of things that look good on paper: California has led the charge to an unconditional ban on incandescent lamps in favor of fluorescent types. It dosnt look like anybody thought about the realities of mercury disposal as a result of spent fluorescent bulbs. OOPS.
post #5 of 9
not fair

more mercury is emitted from coal fired power plants to power incandescent bulbs
than the mercury contained in CCFL's, which can and should last a lot longer.

Real solution to this one is LED's
post #6 of 9
Candles I say, but wait ... whales would not like it.
post #7 of 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrarroyo View Post
There are far bigger fish to fry than going after the small electronics hi-fi manufacturer and their use of lead based solder. But that is my opinion.
I think the compromise should be that commercial manufacturers be required to follow ROHS, but that regular lead-based components (or at least solder) be available for hobbyists. The total lead in all the solder used by hobbyists is inconsequential, and probably less likely to end up in a landfill than mass-market electronics anyways.

If the US ever decides to do anything crazy like that, I'm going to have to horde a few dozen spools of Kester 63/37.
post #8 of 9
RoHS compliance by maojr electronic manufacturer's means lead-tin plating on most of what we buy is no longer available - smaller pcb assembly houses only have lead free lines and won't contaminate their equipment with lead containg parts so as not to lose certification

for military or other hi rel use people are sending RoHS parts to be stripped of the RoHS plating and replated with known reliability lead-tin at great cost
post #9 of 9
I'm stocking up on Kester 60/40 in case just in case the silliness spills stateside.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › DIY (Do-It-Yourself) Discussions › Please explain RoHS...