Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Got the HD 650.. did I bought the wrong headphones?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Got the HD 650.. did I bought the wrong headphones?

post #1 of 69
Thread Starter 
Got the cans three days ago. (even if it says yesterday on the title)

Im coming from my good ol' Sennheiser HD280Pro

My DAC: NI AK1

My first thoughts were: This sounds muddy.

Every single track im listening to, has like some sort of muddy mid range feel to it, and im not feeling that, because all my attention goes to this. I've heard they don't "open up" until at least 100 hours of usage. I hope they do, because im not convinced this is worth 300€ so far.

Another thing i've noticed is they are lacking a bit of the really high frequencies. Everything I play, regardless the genre, sounds way too smooth. Even some mixes that I KNOW are way too harsh at the 13-16khz areas. I feel those harsh sounding hi hats are getting smoothered with the HD 650 and I fear that I can't trust them when mixing. I didn't buy them for pleasurable long period of time listening sessions but to mix as accurate as possible. Also, feels like they don't fully shine until you turn them considerably loud (probably because I was used to the isolation of the HD280 where you could get all the details at really low volumes). What really impresses me is the low end reproduction. Closest thing to having a subwoofer on a nicely threaten room inside your head i've ever heard. Thats cool since I produce electronica, mainly drum and bass.

The reason I bought them is I wanted the best headphone out there to produce, because I can't have monitors on my little bedroom. I readed a lot, and I've heard lots of comments argumenting how closed headphones are not good for producing because of some technical reasons I don't remember. I also heard that the HD 650 had a really flat response (something that you want if you want accurate translations to other sound devices) but at the same time not sounding extremely clinical (I thought, "ok"). But to me, they sound coloured as I said, specially around the mid range area, being way too much "laid back". It has that "hi-fi, produced" whatever feel on every single hihat, regardless the track.

Im really missing the fact that my HD280Pro were closed and you wouldn't get any distractions from the outside, even if its subtle sounds like fan noise from my computer. This means I have to play them louder in order to block the outside noise, and thats bad for my ears.

I obviously knew they were open, but I thought I could adapt to the background noise. The thing is I can't. I don't understand how someone can listen/mix music with background noises, even if its some really subtle fan computer noise, the voice of someone far away, whatever. Gets on my nerves.

Im afraid i'll return them since I don't think I can't stand the background noises. And (unless this doesn't change after a couple of days) they are still sounding a bit muffled, like if there was some sort of midrange filter cutting the frequencies there, lacking a bit of clarity.

I've been looking at closed cans that deliver high end sound quality and someone mentioned the Denon D2000 can compete with the HD650 while being closed and are really comfortable. What are other closed headphones that are good for mixing out there? Around the same price range as the HD650.

Please drop some advice, im kinda dissapointed with this investment
post #2 of 69
I think the HD 650 were designed to be listening cans, not mixing cans.

Try getting your hands on a used pair of AKG K 240 DF. They were designed for studio monitoring and mixing, and have a flat response. Harsh tracks sound harsh, and the sound isn't too laid back.

Too bad they don't make them anymore.
post #3 of 69
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soaa- View Post
I think the HD 650 were designed to be listening cans, not mixing cans.

Try getting your hands on a used pair of AKG K 240 DF. They were designed for studio monitoring and mixing, and have a flat response. Harsh tracks sound harsh, and the sound isn't too laid back.

Too bad they don't make them anymore.
Sounds good, too bad it seems those are open as well.
post #4 of 69
What research did you do before buying? What amp are you using? The 650s are wonderful audiophile headphones when matched well with components, but they are not mixing headphones. The D2000 are definitely not mixing headphones.
post #5 of 69
Well, a few things are wrong here

First is that the HD650 are not mixers, so they are not even close to accurate sounding. I am concerned about this muddy sound you speak of. The hd 650 are supposed to be immensely clear, colored but clear as crystal with a strong bass that is clean as can be.
I am scared you got a defective set or purchased used from someone that knew they were damaged.

-try to clean the grills, blow gently into them, give em a good wipe down.
-make sure they are not damaged inside if you can
-look into a new cord, its possible the cord is damaged if you hear muddy sounds coming out

The HD650 under no circumstances should ever sound that way. I've never once, in my entire audiophile hood heard or read about anyone enjoying the HD280 over the HD 650.

thats like...someone preferring a kids tricycle to a Porsche.
post #6 of 69
"Everything I play, regardless the genre, sounds way too smooth. Even some mixes that I KNOW are way too harsh at the 13-16khz areas."

This sentence makes me suspicious. First of all, I don't believe you're talking about the 13-16khz range, but more probably about the 3-6khz area, which is where the incisiveness you feel you're missing would be found. However, when you say you KNOW certain CDs sound harsh, how do you know? Because they always sounded that way on the old phones? Music is not generally harsh unless it's badly recorded in a reverberent environment. I suggest the 650 is giving you a truer picture but you're so used to a more forward, harsher sound that you feel something is missing. I suggest you wait until the 650s have broken in and, more importantly, until you've got used to their more natural sound--because the sound is definitely much more natural, in fact superior in every way, to the phones you've been used to.
post #7 of 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by swbf2cheater View Post
I am concerned about this muddy sound you speak of. The hd 650 are supposed to be immensely clear, colored but clear as crystal with a strong bass that is clean as can be.
I am scared you got a defective set or purchased used from someone that knew they were damaged.

-try to clean the grills, blow gently into them, give em a good wipe down.
-make sure they are not damaged inside if you can
-look into a new cord, its possible the cord is damaged if you hear muddy sounds coming out

The HD650 under no circumstances should ever sound that way.
I usually think they sound pretty well in line with how the OP describes them. Compared to what the same money buys you from other people its not that bad.

If he bought them from a dealer, which I assume he did because he is thinking of returning them, I would not clean them at all or do any of that stuff. Give yourself some more time to get used to the sound a little bit, but keep them as new as possible to make returning them easier if it comes to that.
Quote:
thats like...someone preferring a kids tricycle to a Porsche.
Thats exactly how I would expect a child to like it better. Or someone who dosnt want the car to jump 15 feet or blow the tires off the ground if they tap the gas pedal the wrong way.

No offense to the OP but the HD650 are not a really great first high end headphone. You should probably learn how to shift and take corners in an old beat up MG or fiat before you take the keys to the Porsche. Im pretty well convinced you need to listen to a bunch of other high end (laughs at some of the crap people will put in that camp) headphones to appreciate the HD650. And even then as everyone agrees they are not neutral, they just have a less offensive coloration than the vast majority of the other headphones in their price range, or even a decent chunk more.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pp312 View Post
"Everything I play, regardless the genre, sounds way too smooth. Even some mixes that I KNOW are way too harsh at the 13-16khz areas."

This sentence makes me suspicious. First of all, I don't believe you're talking about the 13-16khz range, but more probably about the 3-6khz area, which is where the incisiveness you feel you're missing would be found. However, when you say you KNOW certain CDs sound harsh, how do you know? Because they always sounded that way on the old phones? Music is not generally harsh unless it's badly recorded in a reverberent environment. I suggest the 650 is giving you a truer picture but you're so used to a more forward, harsher sound that you feel something is missing. I suggest you wait until the 650s have broken in and, more importantly, until you've got used to their more natural sound--because the sound is definitely much more natural, in fact superior in every way, to the phones you've been used to.
Solid advice
post #8 of 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by swbf2cheater View Post
I am concerned about this muddy sound you speak of. The hd 650 are supposed to be immensely clear, colored but clear as crystal with a strong bass that is clean as can be.
The HD650s are not known for being "immensely clear, clear as crystal". Many people describe them as "veiled". And unless you are using really good amplification, the bass tends to have a homogenous, "one note" quality to it.

For mixing purposes, I would go with AKG. They seem to be a studio standard. I can see why, as my closed-back AKG K271s have better mid-range and high frequency resolution than my HD650s and a more neutral bass response. The HD650s are more euphonic.
post #9 of 69
accidental 2x post srry
post #10 of 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by minimus View Post
The HD650s are not known for being "immensely clear, clear as crystal". Many people describe them as "veiled". And unless you are using really good amplification, the bass tends to have a homogenous, "one note" quality to it.

For mixing purposes, I would go with AKG. They seem to be a studio standard. I can see why, as my closed-back AKG K271s have better mid-range and high frequency resolution than my HD650s and a more neutral bass response. The HD650s are more euphonic.
Sorry, ive never heard anyone say the HD 650s are not clear as a bell. Thats a first for me, I've had mine since they came out and I've never once thought to myself, hmm, these are not clear and saying they are not clear is not a correct statement :\ I've never once, im many years of reading of the upper sennheiser models heard or read anyone say the HD650s are muddy.

to the OP

try lossless FLAC and a different source with your 650s, it could also be the terrible quality mp3s you are using.
post #11 of 69
I had the same reaction to the midrange as you. It wasn't as clear to me and I was coming from the AKG 701. I disliked the HD-650 so much that I ended up selling them within two weeks.

Recently I had felt that I had found the perfect headphone for me, but I just had to try out the HD-600. I checked some frequency charts and I figured i'd like them more then the HD-650. There were a few comments posted recently about the HD-650 vs the HD-600 and that kind of helped.

Right now i'm liking the Sennheiser HD-600. Somehow they're easier to drive then the AKG 702. I have no idea how that is! They're also much more comfortable then the 702. I might keep them. The AKG 702 sound perfect, but they're so lose on my head and I have a hard time driving them.

With every Sennheiser headphone i've tried I felt like I was sitting really far away from the music, but with the HD-600 the effect isn't like that for me. Maybe a bit.

It's hard getting used to the Bass on the HD-600 though. It seems like there's more then the SRH-840 that I also like, but I can't tell yet.
post #12 of 69
Didn't you do your research and see that they are open cans?
post #13 of 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by swbf2cheater View Post
Sorry, ive never heard anyone say the HD 650s are not clear as a bell.
Really? I hear it all the time, much more so than I hear that they are clear as a bell. I can't say my hearing you say that is a first, but it's one of the firsts. Their "veil" is legendary. How else would they have gotten such a reputation as a fine set of smooth relaxation headphones?

Perhaps the mention of "muddy" confused you, because the veil isn't muddy. Just dark. The OP was probably mistaken in saying that. He may also be used to the piercing highs of low-quality closed headphones. When I went from the eH-150 to the SR60i, I actually found the sparkly highs smoother than the one-note daggers of before.

Threads of the veil:
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f4/sen...ssions-163767/
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f4/sen...thread-154240/
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f4/sen...r-veil-219721/ - This one's good because you get to see both sides of the fence. Some don't find them veiled, just dark by comparison. This is probably what the OP is experiencing and he needs to acclimate to it.
http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f4/sennheiser-veil-91865/

Keep in mind, though, that these threads were made while the HD650 was Sennheiser's flagship. Now that the HD800 came out, it seems there's even more acceptance of a veil.

Man, I'm torn over my next side-grade. I need IEMs so I want a pair of RE0. I'm desperate to try the STAX sound so I want an SR-001. I want to see if dark sound is more for me because I've become a lover of bass, so want a pair of HD600s. Gah, looks like I'll be spending a lot in the next year or two.
post #14 of 69
The 650s only show the amazing qualities that are known for having when the the rest of the audio chain has also been well thought out and matched. They can sound crappy, decent, good, damn good, and stunning, all depending on the components used and the quality of the recorded music. I advise considering the whole system, not just he headphones, for anyone considering purchasing any headphones, but with the 650s, it's imperative. Still, I wouldn't use them for mixing.
post #15 of 69
It's amazing how many people buy these cans with no apparent awareness of what it takes to drive them and then complain about the sound. Wow. Just wow.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Got the HD 650.. did I bought the wrong headphones?