Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyll Hertsens 
..The art is in the perception of it.
It's not the painting on the wall, but the feeling it gives you the artist was going after...
...Objective measurements count; subjective experience counts; they two separate things somewhat indirectly related.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by plonter 
I am just listening to a 90's collection I have at home. it is "made in israel" and the sound quality is not impressive to say the least,but I like the songs so much that I am really having a great time 
|
I'm with these observations.
Although I can relate to others who can't stand absolutely poor sound (e.g. the mate with the ill kept too-many-parties stereo that when you remove the speaker cover you find the cones are partly torn

) I've enjoyed sound in my time from well maintained systems from the 1960s onwards.
Obviously each system's synergy has had its particular slant on the music I hear but if the music is to my liking, whether it be due to the recording quality, sense of 'realism' or, as plonter indicates, just a damned great song (sure I'd like it recorded better but it's so involving

) then I'm enjoying my music.
Yes, I do love the best sound I can hear out of my best systems and yes I do upgrade to get the best I can afford (to hear that recording even better

) but I'll still play those tracks I love that aren't recorded as well as the best recordings I have. As Tyll implies to a degree earlier with his 'bed of nails' analogy, I can get past the 'discomofrt' of the less-than-ideal recording when I'm involved with the feelings conveyed by the music.
And, similarly, there are some exceptional recordings I have that, although they impress me with their clarity and 'almost like being there' realism, they just don't engage me no matter how great a system I play them on.