Hi all,
After many years away from the headphone game, i re-entered the realm by purchasing a pair of Grado 325is about a month and a half ago.
Straight out of my computer's soundcard, with WAV files and MP3s (minimum 192bit), the phones sound very neutral, open, dynamic, clean, clear and play quite loudly without distortion.
Having been into higher end audio since i was an early teen (i'm 38 now), i have lots of experience with gear and know what to listen for (i'm big on neutrality, more in the 'clean and clear' camp than in the 'euphonic' camp). Hence, my grado 325is purchase (which to me sound like very, very good quality speakers. Fast, crisp, accurate). Over the years, i've come to realize that without a good source, everything else falls apart.
So, after a bunch of reading on USB dacs, i decided to try out the NuForce uDac. Hell, my entire Motherboard wiht incorporated sound card cost only marginally more than the uDac, so i was anticipating the uDac to be MILES ahead of it in sound quality.
Upon recieving the uDac yesterday (after more than two weeks of waiting for its delivery), i connected it and was... very disappointed.
IMO, this uDac must be made for 'lesser' phones. I say this because of the following: The Grados have a very neutral response, with a bit of tipping up in the highest registers. Most 'lesser' headphones, however, have a frequency response in the shape of a U; bass and treble are tipped up, midrange is recessed. This gives the listener an initial 'wow' upon first listening, but becomes really tiresome really quickly. The uDac seems to have the opposite; its frequency response is an upside down U, with the bass and treble attenuated and with the midrange emphasised. Given what i just stated about 'lesser' heaphones having a U-shaped response curve, i can understand why some people (perhaps less experienced audiophiles) like the uDac; it brings forward the recessed midrange that many heaphones possess, making them more 'neutral' sounding.
However, since the Grados already started off neutral, this upside down U frequency response of the uDac attenuates the bass and treble of the grados and brings the midrange too far forward, resulting in a clammy sound, not unlike being inside a metal garbage can (not that i've been inside a metal garbage can in a while, but you know what i mean). At lower volumes, the more forward midrange is not too bad. At moderate volumes, the midrange just sounds too forward compared to the rest of the range. At higher volumes - forget it. The midrange is too forward by far. I tend to listen at lower to moderate volumes, since my hearing is very sensitive, but this midrange boost is very ...displeasing.
Beyond that, the phones can be played more loudly and more cleanly straight out of the sound card. With the uDac, at higher volumes, the bass seems to start to break up sooner than straight out of the sound card.
After waiting so long for its arrival, i hate to say it, but i'm very disappointed.
Having said all of that, i wonder if anyone has had similar experiences.
Also, does anyone know how much the uDac changes after break-in and how long it takes (i'm a firm believer in break-in. There is no doubt AT ALL in my mind that it exists. It's just a matter of 'to what degree').
I'm even more disappointed b/c i had been planning to buy a LD 1+ for the Grado 325is, but figured 'source first', so decided to buy the uDac first, with plans to get the LD 1+ thereafter.
To be honest, i bought the uDac based on what i read in here, but without offending anyone, i suspect that those who are 'wowed' by it have either A: significantly different gear than i do or B: are not particularly experienced with high end audio. Maybe it's a combination of the two.
This has made me leery of buying the LD 1+ as well, since i was going to purchase it solely on the recommendations of fellow head-fiers.
So, to sum up, what are others' experience with the udac and its break-in? does it change dramatically? Does it eventually open up and settle down?
Also, i wonder if the LD 1+ talk on here is all hype as well...Something tells me i should have gone with my gut and bought the amp first. But, I sure as hell don't want yet ANOTHER disappointment from another online purchase for which i'll have to wait several weeks. And beyond that, given my financial circumstances, i don't really want to throw money down the toilet by buying something and reselling it at a loss shortly thereafter.
Opinions? Thoughts? should i give the uDac more time? Should i just sell it and put the money towards a LD 1+ amp? ...i'm so sad... Meh.
After many years away from the headphone game, i re-entered the realm by purchasing a pair of Grado 325is about a month and a half ago.
Straight out of my computer's soundcard, with WAV files and MP3s (minimum 192bit), the phones sound very neutral, open, dynamic, clean, clear and play quite loudly without distortion.
Having been into higher end audio since i was an early teen (i'm 38 now), i have lots of experience with gear and know what to listen for (i'm big on neutrality, more in the 'clean and clear' camp than in the 'euphonic' camp). Hence, my grado 325is purchase (which to me sound like very, very good quality speakers. Fast, crisp, accurate). Over the years, i've come to realize that without a good source, everything else falls apart.
So, after a bunch of reading on USB dacs, i decided to try out the NuForce uDac. Hell, my entire Motherboard wiht incorporated sound card cost only marginally more than the uDac, so i was anticipating the uDac to be MILES ahead of it in sound quality.
Upon recieving the uDac yesterday (after more than two weeks of waiting for its delivery), i connected it and was... very disappointed.
IMO, this uDac must be made for 'lesser' phones. I say this because of the following: The Grados have a very neutral response, with a bit of tipping up in the highest registers. Most 'lesser' headphones, however, have a frequency response in the shape of a U; bass and treble are tipped up, midrange is recessed. This gives the listener an initial 'wow' upon first listening, but becomes really tiresome really quickly. The uDac seems to have the opposite; its frequency response is an upside down U, with the bass and treble attenuated and with the midrange emphasised. Given what i just stated about 'lesser' heaphones having a U-shaped response curve, i can understand why some people (perhaps less experienced audiophiles) like the uDac; it brings forward the recessed midrange that many heaphones possess, making them more 'neutral' sounding.
However, since the Grados already started off neutral, this upside down U frequency response of the uDac attenuates the bass and treble of the grados and brings the midrange too far forward, resulting in a clammy sound, not unlike being inside a metal garbage can (not that i've been inside a metal garbage can in a while, but you know what i mean). At lower volumes, the more forward midrange is not too bad. At moderate volumes, the midrange just sounds too forward compared to the rest of the range. At higher volumes - forget it. The midrange is too forward by far. I tend to listen at lower to moderate volumes, since my hearing is very sensitive, but this midrange boost is very ...displeasing.
Beyond that, the phones can be played more loudly and more cleanly straight out of the sound card. With the uDac, at higher volumes, the bass seems to start to break up sooner than straight out of the sound card.
After waiting so long for its arrival, i hate to say it, but i'm very disappointed.
Having said all of that, i wonder if anyone has had similar experiences.
Also, does anyone know how much the uDac changes after break-in and how long it takes (i'm a firm believer in break-in. There is no doubt AT ALL in my mind that it exists. It's just a matter of 'to what degree').
I'm even more disappointed b/c i had been planning to buy a LD 1+ for the Grado 325is, but figured 'source first', so decided to buy the uDac first, with plans to get the LD 1+ thereafter.
To be honest, i bought the uDac based on what i read in here, but without offending anyone, i suspect that those who are 'wowed' by it have either A: significantly different gear than i do or B: are not particularly experienced with high end audio. Maybe it's a combination of the two.
This has made me leery of buying the LD 1+ as well, since i was going to purchase it solely on the recommendations of fellow head-fiers.
So, to sum up, what are others' experience with the udac and its break-in? does it change dramatically? Does it eventually open up and settle down?
Also, i wonder if the LD 1+ talk on here is all hype as well...Something tells me i should have gone with my gut and bought the amp first. But, I sure as hell don't want yet ANOTHER disappointment from another online purchase for which i'll have to wait several weeks. And beyond that, given my financial circumstances, i don't really want to throw money down the toilet by buying something and reselling it at a loss shortly thereafter.
Opinions? Thoughts? should i give the uDac more time? Should i just sell it and put the money towards a LD 1+ amp? ...i'm so sad... Meh.






















