or Connect
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphone Amps (full-size) › Official Audio-gd Sparrow thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official Audio-gd Sparrow thread - Page 17

post #241 of 725

They are using tenor 7022 chipset now. Surprising.

post #242 of 725
Quote:
Originally Posted by loveholic View Post

They are using tenor 7022 chipset now. Surprising.



what is so surprising,would it be a bad chip.

post #243 of 725
Quote:
Originally Posted by kunalraiker View Post
what is so surprising,would it be a bad chip.

 

Because someone here mentioned Tenor told Kingwa the chip was unstable. Didn't think they were going to use this chip.
 

post #244 of 725

you are scaring me,I'am awaiting my DAC with this chip.

post #245 of 725

I personally would choose the new tenor chip over previous one. I also noticed they dropped the price for a bit which is a plus. Sparrow just got sweeter.


Edited by loveholic - 6/8/10 at 12:27am
post #246 of 725

Awesome news! After I pass my exams, I'm definetely buying one!

post #247 of 725

I went ahead and ordered the Basic BNC version after hearing USB was out of stock on here (didn't care too much, would be connected by TOSLINK to desktop PC and probably not used with laptop), but about half a week later they emailed me and told me that they were out of stock on the BNC version and asked if it was ok if they just sent me the USB version - gladly accepted ofcourse.

 

When I get it I'll try to test it on the 3 pairs of headphones I have: Alessandro MS-1, AKG K240 MKII, and Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro 250-ohm. It will be my first DAC/Amp as all I have used until now is direct analog out from a Xonar DX sound card (which by the way was a HUGE upgrade over the onboard sound, most likely because the onboard sound couldn't supply nearly enough power).

 

I'm a bit skeptical as to how much of an improvement if any at all the sparrow will be, as with all 3 pairs of my headphones I cannot set the volume higher than about 40% before my headphones begin to make me deaf, so they seem to be driven pretty well just connected directly to the sound card. For my laptop, it will definitely be a big improvement as all 3 pairs of headphones sound very thin in comparison to my desktop PC connected to the Xonar DX at any volume. Can't wait for it to get here.


Edited by Elanzer - 6/8/10 at 2:12am
post #248 of 725

Try and conduct a blind test before you review the sparrow.  This goes to all.  Humans have natural biases when testing audio equipment.

post #249 of 725
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy*Carl View Post

Try and conduct a blind test before you review the sparrow.  This goes to all.  Humans have natural biases when testing audio equipment.


Will do.  I think everyone who takes testing seriously attempts to control for their natural biases to the extent possible.  In any case, I'm only going to be testing the two through a macbook pro, 580s and JH13s, and I really don't expect there to be much difference at all. I'd be surprised if there was.  Sparrow's cheaper but with more space for components and wall power, D4 is almost twice the price but has to run off battery and accomidate two gains.  I'd expect they'll come out nearly identical.  

post #250 of 725
Quote:
Originally Posted by AVU View Post




Will do.  I think everyone who takes testing seriously attempts to control for their natural biases to the extent possible.  In any case, I'm only going to be testing the two through a macbook pro, 580s and JH13s, and I really don't expect there to be much difference at all. I'd be surprised if there was.  Sparrow's cheaper but with more space for components and wall power, D4 is almost twice the price but has to run off battery and accomidate two gains.  I'd expect they'll come out nearly identical.  


I am much more interested for you to compare the Sparrow to your mac book pro headphone out.

post #251 of 725
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy*Carl View Post




I am much more interested for you to compare the Sparrow to your mac book pro headphone out.


I intend to do this with my new MBP when the Sparrow arrives, for sure.  By the way discussion of DBT is forbidden outside the Sound Science forum.

 

As for the Tenor chip, there were questions of its reliability, but I guess that Kingwa has solved them (or Tenor has) if he's using the chip.  At worst, the chip is on a separate board.  It would be a good idea if all his products that have USB included had it on a separate chip as it would then be easily upgradable should a better solution become available, then he'd just have to upgrade the USB board.  As well, so could customers.

post #252 of 725

Wow, the comparisons made here...  I'm expecting the Sparrow to dominate against onboard laptop.

post #253 of 725

Done a bunch of tests, but will do a bunch more before writing up the results.  I do want to say the following for those thinking of buying the Sparrow: DIR 9001 instead of CS8116, and AD1852 instead of WM8740.  The amp is plenty smooth and rich with the standard, low-jitter DIR and D/A - I can't imagine wanting it to sound any "softer or more tube like" than it already is.  

post #254 of 725
Quote:
Originally Posted by Currawong View Post




I intend to do this with my new MBP when the Sparrow arrives, for sure.  By the way discussion of DBT is forbidden outside the Sound Science forum.

 

 


Thats stupid, post it anyway.

post #255 of 725
Quote:
Originally Posted by FallenAngel View Post

Wow, the comparisons made here...  I'm expecting the Sparrow to dominate against onboard laptop.


Mine, as well as every other external DAC/AMP I have heard doesn't sound any difference than my intels onboard sound.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphone Amps (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphone Amps (full-size) › Official Audio-gd Sparrow thread