Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Multi-IEM Review - 281 IEMs compared (VSonic GR07 BE and R02 Silver Added 05/15/13 p.688)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Multi-IEM Review - 281 IEMs compared (VSonic GR07 BE and R02 Silver Added 05/15/13 p.688) - Page 581

post #8701 of 10427
11/11/12 at 11:28am
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by EveTan View Post


Which signature would you say brings the most clarity? My ideal signature is something that has both clarity in vocals, strings, piano etc but also still has some of the umpf of the bass.


Generally, a flat one. However, enhanced treble and brighter sound can sometimes create the illusion of even greater clarity, depending on where the boost is. This is how earphones such as the JVC FX40 and PureSound ClarityOne generally sound clearer than the competition. 

 

If you also want enhanced bass then I agree with Joe, a v-shaped sound is probably best. 

Reply

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #8702 of 10427
11/11/12 at 7:16pm

Okay, pulled the trigger on Shure SE215s.  wish me luck...

 

Gonna continue to use my Koss KSC75's for listening while lying down.  Maybe I'll get MEE M6/S6 later for casual listening.

 

I might post a noob review once I get the Shures.

 

JJ

Reply
post #8703 of 10427
11/11/12 at 10:50pm

Hey Joker, would you pull the trigger on a pair of UE 900s for $250, new? I was thinking about saving up for 1964 Ears' V3s but am wondering if this is a deal too good to pass up.

Reply
post #8704 of 10427
11/11/12 at 11:55pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nisten View Post

Hey Joker, would you pull the trigger on a pair of UE 900s for $250, new? I was thinking about saving up for 1964 Ears' V3s but am wondering if this is a deal too good to pass up.

Where are you finding these for $250 new!? I want to get a pair!!! eek.gif
Reply
post #8705 of 10427
11/12/12 at 12:37am

+1!!

Reply
post #8706 of 10427
11/12/12 at 12:39am
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickH9 View Post


Where are you finding these for $250 new!? I want to get a pair!!! eek.gif

+ 2

Reply
post #8707 of 10427
11/12/12 at 2:15am

Hi Joker,

 

Love your work!  My current rig is Fisher DBA-O2 (mk2) with JDS Labs O2.  Love the aggressive analytical detailed sound, though at times the sibilance is bothersome.  Have been thinking of an upgrade, and have been considering the Alclair Reference.  Also looking at the 1964 V3 and the CTM 200.  The Reference sounded good as it provides a nice sounding blend of musicality and detail.  Am ok with full shell monitors.  However since I can't demo all 3 was wondering what your view is - my perfect sound is that of my current rig sans sibilance, and with a flat presentation, a nice blend of musicality and detail, leaning toward detail.  My prefered music is prog, jazz, rock.  I use a ipod classic and only bit rate 256 and above.

 

Many thanks!

Reply
post #8708 of 10427
11/12/12 at 9:06am
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickH9 View Post


Where are you finding these for $250 new!? I want to get a pair!!! eek.gif

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by hitme987 View Post

+1!!

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Saraguie View Post

+ 2

Believe me guys, if this was a retailer I would spread the word! I found a local, private seller wanting to get rid of his.

Reply
post #8709 of 10427
11/12/12 at 9:48am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nisten View Post


Believe me guys, if this was a retailer I would spread the word! I found a local, private seller wanting to get rid of his.

I had my hopes up frown.gif
Reply
post #8710 of 10427
11/12/12 at 6:43pm

Hi Joker,


Any schedule in reivewing DUNU  DN-19 Tai Chi. A little bit thoughts could be great. （Not to rush you tongue.gif）

 

I am very interested in those kind of tunable products. The Meelectronics sp51, I have tried it but it's unfortunate not so good with the tuning out come.

 

It's simply only able to tune by yourself. To me it's like a toy and not to mention the SQ. I already tried IE8. It's very good sound thought tuning effect still not so prominent.

 

Just wondering How you see the DN-19's tuning and SQ.  I may probably get one if you think it's good.

Reply
post #8711 of 10427
11/12/12 at 8:06pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nisten View Post

Hey Joker, would you pull the trigger on a pair of UE 900s for $250, new? I was thinking about saving up for 1964 Ears' V3s but am wondering if this is a deal too good to pass up.

 

It really depends on whether the signature is right for you. The V3 sounds pretty different - bassier, more forward in the midrange, and more intimate in the way records are presented. As an all-rounder the UE900 is pretty darn good for $250 and you'll probably be able to re-sell it and not lose much when you're done with it.

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by christobit View Post

Hi Joker,

 

Love your work!  My current rig is Fisher DBA-O2 (mk2) with JDS Labs O2.  Love the aggressive analytical detailed sound, though at times the sibilance is bothersome.  Have been thinking of an upgrade, and have been considering the Alclair Reference.  Also looking at the 1964 V3 and the CTM 200.  The Reference sounded good as it provides a nice sounding blend of musicality and detail.  Am ok with full shell monitors.  However since I can't demo all 3 was wondering what your view is - my perfect sound is that of my current rig sans sibilance, and with a flat presentation, a nice blend of musicality and detail, leaning toward detail.  My prefered music is prog, jazz, rock.  I use a ipod classic and only bit rate 256 and above.

 

Many thanks!

 

Just wrote this up for a PM but figured I might as well re-post it here:

 

Alclair Reference: good bass and clarity, spacious presentation, high levels of detail, can be a bit hot in the treble. Universal counterparts: Phonak PFE232, VSonic GR07

1964EARS 1964-V3: enhanced bass with prominent mids; good dynamics; well-layered presentation; overall "fun" sound. Universal counterparts: AKG K3003, JVC HA-FXT90

ClearTuneMonitors CTM-200: Neutral tone with a balanced signature; spacious presentation, smooth treble, lacks a bit of deep bass; Universal counterparts: HiFiMan RE272, VSonic GR01

 

None of these are perfect - you'll be making trade-offs whichever way you go. The CTM-200 has the smoothest treble but also won't be as detailed and effortless as the Reference (especially in the bass region). The V3 is not as neutral as either of those two but very enjoyable nonetheless. Personally I prefer the signature of the CTM-200 but the technical ability of the Reference redface.gif. 

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by impoki02 View Post

Hi Joker,


Any schedule in reivewing DUNU  DN-19 Tai Chi. A little bit thoughts could be great. （Not to rush you tongue.gif）

 

I am very interested in those kind of tunable products. The Meelectronics sp51, I have tried it but it's unfortunate not so good with the tuning out come.

 

It's simply only able to tune by yourself. To me it's like a toy and not to mention the SQ. I already tried IE8. It's very good sound thought tuning effect still not so prominent.

 

Just wondering How you see the DN-19's tuning and SQ.  I may probably get one if you think it's good.


Yes, I have a DN-19 in the queue. Currently working on the I 3-CS, though. 

 

The SP51 remains one of the more 'tunable' ones I've heard. Generally the differences with tuning ports are pretty mild. With the DN-19, based on the very limited listening I've done so far, the tuning seems to only affect the bass. I prefer it with the 'flatter' tuning. Not quite sure where it ranks overall at this point but its review shouldn't be far off. 

Reply
post #8712 of 10427
11/12/12 at 8:51pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by impoki02 View Post

Hi Joker,


Any schedule in reivewing DUNU  DN-19 Tai Chi. A little bit thoughts could be great. （Not to rush you tongue.gif）

 

I am very interested in those kind of tunable products. The Meelectronics sp51, I have tried it but it's unfortunate not so good with the tuning out come.

 

It's simply only able to tune by yourself. To me it's like a toy and not to mention the SQ. I already tried IE8. It's very good sound thought tuning effect still not so prominent.

 

Just wondering How you see the DN-19's tuning and SQ.  I may probably get one if you think it's good.

 

You can have much more fun with an EQ tongue.gif

Reply
post #8713 of 10427
11/12/12 at 10:15pm

Thanks a ton!  You have helped me rule out the V3.  I'm thinking that CTM-200 paired with JDS O2 would be closer to my current rig (DBA-O2 with JDS O2).  Would that be right?  If so, I'm probably better off going with the Reference for a different yet upgraded option.  Would you agree?

 

Cheers

Reply
post #8714 of 10427
11/13/12 at 2:36am

how does one decide between W4 to UM3x ?

 

and in general: what is the difference between "Universal Monitors" and "Westone Series"?

( http://www.westone.com/music/index.php/products/custom-or-universal.html )

 

so far, had experience with gr06, and fxt90, and waiting on ie80 to arrive...

 

 

thanks!

Reply
post #8715 of 10427
11/13/12 at 10:38am

Joker,

 

What do you think is the most natural non-fatiguing sound signature for listening to both male and female vocals and also what is your perception EPH-100's vocal performance lets say compared to SM3 or UM3X ? I feel like EPH-100 sounds slightly more raw and realistic with vocals whereas SM3 and UM3X make vocals sounds smoother, more silk like but in return slightly less realistic I guess.  I especially notice this with Melody Gardot - Our love is easy. Just wanted to ask your take on this

Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Multi-IEM Review - 281 IEMs compared (VSonic GR07 BE and R02 Silver Added 05/15/13 p.688)