Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckster 
I'd personally go with the X
what content did you listen to on the X - instore ? what bitrate etc ? or just the stuff on it already ?
I have a Touch - admittadly non-amped - if I do a direct A-B between the 2 instanteously - with same content, the difference sounds fairly slight
but I can listen to music for hours on the X but get tired after a short time with the Touch
|
I listened to something stuff put it there, it should be 320k, but my kenwood was playing wav, to be honest, Sony X sounded fairly good, but I was not impressed as I thought kenwood did better expect bass which I didn't crave for
Quote:
Originally Posted by revolink24 
I second the X Series. I personally prefer that sound to the oPods sound, which is still an iPod even with an LOD and an amp.
|
That is what I worry about
Quote:
Originally Posted by RAQemUP 
Plus you can also amp the X series now with an LOD apparently. Which means get an X now and then an amp down the line.
|
It is good thing to know that sony X is available for another upgrade option just like ipod
Quote:
Originally Posted by Young Spade 
I would say it depends on what version iPod and what kind of amp you're going to get. You MIGHT get better sound quality through a LoD and a good amp but that's gonna cost you; I had a 5G Nano with LoD and RSA Tomahawk and loved the sound but IMO it's blown away by the s:flo2.
|
S:Flo2 blows Sony X series, I can't keep my jaw close. I should keep an eye on it then.
Can you tell me more about S:flo2. What makes you think it is clear winner?