Quote:
Originally Posted by CrazyRay 
Some of the best recordings ever made were in mono.
Don't knock it till you tried it.
The sound is awesome!!!!
MILES DAVIS: KIND OF BLUE — 6 EYE ORIGINAL MONO PRESSING 
Muddy Waters: Folk Singer — Vinyl, LP, Mono 
Most of the Beatles Recordings
I could keep on going....
|
MONO is awesome for SOME...repeat...SOME recordings. Back in the golden age of recording mono was king and such mixes were the focus of the engineers and artists. The prime example is The Beatles. Most recording studios added stereo later and had different microphone placement for both the mono and stereo. A great example is Frank Sinatra's Come Fly With Me. The mono and stereo are two different beasts. Some producers/artists (Brian Wilson, Phil Spector) preferred mono because it allowed them to lock in a particular sound and regardless of speaker placement, would always sound the same.
HOWEVER, modern recordings are made FOR stereo (or more channels) and are rarely mixed in mono. When you collapse a modern stereo song into mono there is no telling what will happen. Sometimes you get comb filtering, sometimes you lose an instrument thanks to phase cancellation and you will most definitely lose ambiance and soundstage.
I can understand why someone would prefer a mono Kind of Blue or a mono Time Out or mono Beatles. They usually sound better! Why on earth someone would prefer a mono QUEEN record or mono Norah Jones is beyond me. I wouldn't say such a person has lost his/her mind but I wouldn't hesitate to say they are a monophonic moron. But hey....it's a free world.
