Interesting findings. I haven't compared these amps but to me BCL is pretty much the best match up for HD600. The reason for that is everything you wrote in your review. HD600 paired with some average amp sounds fussy, too warm, slow and lifeless. BCL makes them sound alive and opens them up. I would imagine that BCL sucks bad with something brighter like Grados or AKG but with HD6X0 it's a match made in heaven. I've heard HD800 also but not with BCL. Based on that audition, I wouldn't pair them up with BCL because HD800 sounds much brighter and lighter than HD6X0.
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Tags
Related Forum Threads
- $1000 system for my pops 50th Last post on Yesterday at 10:25 pm in Headphones (full-size)
- Looking for amp to pair with HD650, maybe sub-$500 (maybe not) Last post on 1/11/12 at 7:32am in Headphone Amps (full-size)
- Valhalla or LD MK IV SE for HD 650s Last post on 2/17/12 at 6:39am in Headphone Amps (full-size)
- Hey bros please help me out! Whats a good, affordable($200 or below) amp/dac for the Sennheiser... Last post on 1/7/12 at 9:43pm in Headphone Amps (full-size)
- Valhalla vs Crack for HD650 Last post on 3/18/12 at 3:05am in Headphone Amps (full-size)
Related Articles
-
Headphone Impedance
Edited on 12/9/11 | Contribute to this Article
-
Grado Modification Overview
Edited on 9/27/11 | Contribute to this Article
-
Buying Guide Headphones By Price Range
Edited on 3/24/12 | Contribute to this Article
-
A Hopefully Helpful Headphone Buying Guide For Newbies By Boomana
Edited on 5/7/10 | Contribute to this Article
Related Head Gear
Recent Reviews
-
it's about two weeks that i've bought them and i'm quiet satisfied with it ... first i wanted to buy the J3 but it's 3.3 AMOLED screen and good video playing was not needed!! it's low 16GB...
-
SEE PROS & CONS. NOTE: The clamping factor will obviously differ from person to person, but I'm surprised to find little mention of it, as it is the sole reason I'd never think twice about...
-
When I listened to the sound for the 1st time, I was hit by it. I was punched by the not-punchy-bass. I was hoping it would offer much better bass response than SE315.. equals to Klipsch Image...
-
Synopsis: The Aurisonics AS-1b is a very nice custom-fit monitor with a sound tuned for the needs of professional musicians performing on stage. It gives the listener a mid-centric sound that...
-
HiFiMAN HE400 By now I think most of us are familiar with the history behind the HiFiMAN HE-series headphones. What started with a single model has grown into a full...
Head-Fi Sponsors
Comparison: Lehmann back cube linear, Earmax pro, X-Can V8p (with HD 650) - Page 2
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
- shabta
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 189 Posts. Joined 1/2010
- Location: France
- Select All Posts By This User
I guess we all have different ears. My pro audio engineer friend was here yesterday. I played him the Lehmann with the HD 650. Sounded pretty good, no really, really good. Then HD800. He thought it was the best thing he ever heard in head-fi. I certainly think the HD800 sounds amazing with the lehmann.The bright and and lightness of the HD800 becomes a marvelously detailed and open soundstage with the lehmann.
Anyway, I respect not everyone will hear it this way, but just thought you might enjoy getting another view into the mix.
- mironathetin
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 85 Posts. Joined 1/2010
- Location: Central Europe
- Select All Posts By This User
I agree with you that the HD 800 are great Headphones. Even Sennheiser used the LBC to present the HD 800, so there must be a good match between them.
I am sorry that I did not honour the HD 800 enough. They were just lying around when I tried the LBC and I put them on. I immediately realized that they sound far superior to the HD 650 (so I put them away quickly, because I wanted to focus on the amps, not be tempted to buy a new headphone ;o).
The point I wanted to make is: with the HD 650 I did not like the LBC for the noted reasons. With the HD 800 I could still hear what I did not like (though much less disturbing). I wrote this to make clear that my problems were not due to the HD 650 but due to the LBC, or probably only because both do not match, IMHO.
Ears are very personal things though, so we expect differences. Try to listen to the earmax. Comparison is the essence to understand differences. The earmax sound characteristic is very different to the LBC. While someone has mentioned that for electronic music the LBC sounds great, for classical, string or voices I did not appreciate its sound at all.
Probably it comes down to what you prefer to listen to and what you like: your "marvelously detailed" is the half-full-glass-view, while my "decomposing" is the half-empty-glass view. Could be that it describes the same thing.
- shabta
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 189 Posts. Joined 1/2010
- Location: France
- Select All Posts By This User

I agree with you that the HD 800 are great Headphones. Even Sennheiser used the LBC to present the HD 800, so there must be a good match between them.
I am sorry that I did not honour the HD 800 enough. They were just lying around when I tried the LBC and I put them on. I immediately realized that they sound far superior to the HD 650 (so I put them away quickly, because I wanted to focus on the amps, not be tempted to buy a new headphone ;o).
The point I wanted to make is: with the HD 650 I did not like the LBC for the noted reasons. With the HD 800 I could still hear what I did not like (though much less disturbing). I wrote this to make clear that my problems were not due to the HD 650 but due to the LBC, or probably only because both do not match, IMHO.
Ears are very personal things though, so we expect differences. Try to listen to the earmax. Comparison is the essence to understand differences. The earmax sound characteristic is very different to the LBC. While someone has mentioned that for electronic music the LBC sounds great, for classical, string or voices I did not appreciate its sound at all.
Probably it comes down to what you prefer to listen to and what you like: your "marvelously detailed" is the half-full-glass-view, while my "decomposing" is the half-empty-glass view. Could be that it describes the same thing.
In fact, I think it is.
My pro audio engineer test subject is very likely to value what you found annoying. In your original post I think you were trying to make the point that you found the Lehmann analytical more than musical. Actually he commented that he would have like to have had my HD800/Lehmann setup on the mixing job he just finished.
Furthermore, speaking on a personal note, I might also agree with your assessment were I to hear the earmax. Although in my case I am more satisfied with my system than any I have ever had as it is and I actually dread upsetting the apple cart, and thrusting myself in to new adventures in wallet burning, so I might not go out of my way just yet to try a new amp. Sometimes its good to have a stretch of laying back, enjoying the tunes and not worrying how to make it all better.
In any case, my post was more a response to Patu's post. I thought, rather than speculation about 650 vs 800 on Lehmann, a direct A/B comparision was in order. And by coincidence, I did one with a friend in the last few days. What is also interesting about my friend is that he had no skin in the game. If I tell you that I like my $1400 headphones better then my $350 ones, you can come up with explanations for why I might think this besides the fact that they are actually better.
- Prog Rock Man
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 3,801 Posts. Joined 7/2009
- Location: Scotland
- Select All Posts By This User
This is a great thread mironathetin, thanks.
- Patu
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 3,260 Posts. Joined 2/2005
- Location: Helsinki, Finland
- Select All Posts By This User
Yes, naturally we all have different ears and opinions. To me, HD6X0 is still on the dark side even with BCL. Only slightly so though. With some lesser amps it's much worse.
I tried HD800 with some heavily modified WooAudio tubeamp. IMO they sounded way too bright and artificial. That might not have been the best pairing. Of course there was tons of detail, transparency and separation in the sound but in the end I prefer the slightly softer and warmer touch of HD600.
It's nice that your friend is proaudio engineer but I have mostly bad experiences with proaudio equipment and their sound. They tend to be sterile and lifeless but with utmost clarity and tons of details. Benchmark DAC1 is great example. It's not a very good DAC IMO but it probably works great in studio environment.
Edited by Patu - 5/7/10 at 4:49pm
well you don't get stax separation, but they give the appearance of instrument and voice separation and spacing, however artificial,,, more than other closed bass Phones imo.
They are great for helping to decipher and separate where all the different sections of the orchestra. in addition to their signature, this is a result form the driver being further away from your ear, so the sound isnt all in your face as much, i can tell you for sure that this was the case for me.
Also, i had to constantly press the drivers into my head to make them punch, and it was very annoying,,, obviously all phones will have that reaction when pushed to ears, but doing this to the dx was a lot more noticeable,
-
it isn't just that the mids were lacking because of the further separation from driver to ear,, but also that their signature just lacks mids, and or its mids sound weird, and they take some time getting used too, but when u do they are pretty enjoyable, but will not sound great on every recording, but then again not every phone does either.
for me it basically came down to size and ease of operation, and couldn't lay back and chill with em, so they had too go,, or i couldn't turn my head that was the most annoying,
,, i do miss em, but if i had em i know it would again piss me off.
Edited by techenvy - 5/8/10 at 11:41am
- mironathetin
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 85 Posts. Joined 1/2010
- Location: Central Europe
- Select All Posts By This User
The show goes on: 3rd part of the tuning and comparison of the OP: enter stage: Earmax Silver Edition.
My original idea was to let the X-Can fine tune by Musical Fidelity to finally make the best out of it. That was the whole plan from the beginning: buy a good amp that is not too expensive and improve the thing, if it sounds good. The X-Can allows this nicely with valve replacement, psu tuning and finally MFs fine tuning.
Fine tuning means, MF will replace cheap china parts with high quality parts, reclock, re-tune, bypass unnecessary capacitances, precision match valves and output transformer chips. This is supposed to result in enhanced sound quality, better frequency response (a property of the higher quality parts) and what not. I already had the form at home and prepared to send the item to UK.
But then I had second thoughts: fine tuning is 189 GBP. Fine with me, the value of the item will rise, so its an investment. But then I had to send the package to UK, pay also for sending it back and send money by bank transfer. For UK residents this is all free, but not outside UK. A quick check resulted in 80 Euros overhead for this. No investment, just wasted money (especially the bank transfer to UK and conversion into British Pounds is ... cough ... expensive - MF does not accept Paypal of course) I really don't like unnecessary cramming of already much too fat banks.
So I shopped around and tried to find out what I would get for the budget (sell X-Can plus fine tuning expenses) and finally found a dealer, who sent an Earmax Silver Edition for a test (I got Mr. Brocksiepers personal test amp, directly from him, btw.).
Side by side compared to the X-Can plus little Pinkie psu, I must say that the Silver Edition, unlike the Earmax Pro, completely outperforms the X-Can. The bass is deeper and better defined. But what strikes most is the enhanced clarity of everything. As if a layer of dust has been removed from the sound signal. Not something that you hardly hear, but really a profound enhancement. Keeping the Earmax Silver was absolutely a no-brainer.
I wouldn't say that the fine-tuning wouldn't have brought the X-Can to a similar level. But this could simply not be tested at all. It was like: spend 300 Euro for a good guess against 300 Euro for an instrument that brought it all for sure. A no-brainer, as I said.
Please find a photo here:
http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread/500363/what-do-you-do-against-microphonics#post_6755070
Edited by mironathetin - 8/7/10 at 1:02pm
- 2loud
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 6 Posts. Joined 4/2010
- Location: Germany
- Select All Posts By This User
Thanks for a great review and thread! I´ve heard these three amps myself at various dealers and with various equipment. The Earmax (Pro) was with a Naim CD player, unknown cables and my own headphones. The most impressive thing I found with this set up was voices, they were so realistic sounding and when listening to a chorus recording it was all so detailed - I got a much better idea of the choir´s size and placement than before. Hope you´re having a good time with your amp!
Edited by 2loud - 3/12/11 at 8:08am
- mironathetin
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 85 Posts. Joined 1/2010
- Location: Central Europe
- Select All Posts By This User
Thanks a lot 2loud.
Yes, I still have the earmax silver and I still enjoy it a lot. Most of the time, I use my iPod Nano (2nd gen) with Sennheiser ie7. If I find the time to put on the HD 650 with the earmax, it sounds like a dream compared to the iPod. No reason for an upgrade.
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
- Comparison: Lehmann back cube linear, Earmax pro, X-Can V8p (with HD 650)
Recent Discussions
- › Lets Talk Metal 1 minute ago
- › The Audeze LCD-2 Ortho thread (New) 3 minutes ago
- › UPDATED : Denon D5000 for Sale *PRICE DROP* 3 minutes ago
- › Stax SR 207 (or 202) compared to Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro 3 minutes ago
- › Bang for the buck portable headphones at 50$ max 6 minutes ago
- › Sony Walkman NW-Z1000 vs NWZ-A860 (Review + unboxing) 7 minutes ago
- › HifiMAN HE-6 Planar Magnetic Headphone 10 minutes ago
- › Best IEMs around £125 10 minutes ago
- › [REVIEW] Audiofly AF78 Hybrid IEM: A Very Brave Proposition 12 minutes ago
- › Songs that make your headphone WOOOOOW!!! 12 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Cowon C2-16BS 16 GB Video Player, Black with Silver by burninmind
- › BRAINWAVZ HM5 Studio Monitor Headphones by Night Crawler
- › Shure SE535LTD RED by sue4
- › Aurisonics AS-1b by Kunlun
- › HiFiMAN HE-400 by project86
- › Pioneer SE MJ31 by jojexy
- › Grado SR60i Headphones by Smiling Jack
- › Final Audio Design Adagio V by SpringBiscuit
- › Matrix Quattro Dac by shipsupt
- › Sennheiser HD 800 Headphones by DannyRox23
New Articles
- › iBasso DX100 FAQ by DoctorHeadz
- › DIY Cable Info and Resources by Pingupenguins
- › Asr Head-Fi Threads Compendium by Asr
- › Headphone Buying Guide by keanex
- › Fostex T50RP modification summary LINKS - wiki by jgray91
- › Comparisons of the LCD-3 and the LCD-2 Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Posting Guidelines by Currawong
- › Comparisons of LCD-2 Rev. 1 and Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Membership Levels, Badges and Custom Titles by Currawong
- › Sennheiser Hd4 8 Modding For Newbies by koolkat
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map













