I read in the 37 headphone amps compared that Mustang has very good mid-range, which is kind of source-dependent for my CK100. Does P71 and shadow produce comparable or better mid range? If I have to choose among P71, shadown and Mustang, which will have the best midrange?
Join Now
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Recent Reviews
-
it's about two weeks that i've bought them and i'm quiet satisfied with it ... first i wanted to buy the J3 but it's 3.3 AMOLED screen and good video playing was not needed!! it's low 16GB...
-
SEE PROS & CONS. NOTE: The clamping factor will obviously differ from person to person, but I'm surprised to find little mention of it, as it is the sole reason I'd never think twice about...
-
When I listened to the sound for the 1st time, I was hit by it. I was punched by the not-punchy-bass. I was hoping it would offer much better bass response than SE315.. equals to Klipsch Image...
-
Synopsis: The Aurisonics AS-1b is a very nice custom-fit monitor with a sound tuned for the needs of professional musicians performing on stage. It gives the listener a mid-centric sound that...
-
HiFiMAN HE400 By now I think most of us are familiar with the history behind the HiFiMAN HE-series headphones. What started with a single model has grown into a full...
Head-Fi Sponsors
Drop by and thank our partners for helping keep the lights on at Head-Fi!
RSA P71 vs Shadow vs Mustang?
post #2 of 32
2/11/10 at 2:59pm
- cck5
- Trader Feedback: +4
-
- offline
- 888 Posts. Joined 1/2010
- Location: New York City/Toronto
- Select All Posts By This User
most people here tend to be big fans of the p51, i have never heard them but thats what ive seen while looking around.
post #3 of 32
2/11/10 at 11:05pm
- LeeMark
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 373 Posts. Joined 3/2008
- Location: Boston
- Select All Posts By This User
I assume you mean SR71 or P51 (but that is the Mustang). Skylab says the P51 and the shadow have such a similar sound he didn't botehr to review it. However, you will do well with any of these, so form factor may come into play. Or maybe just wait for the balanced Protector.
post #4 of 32
2/12/10 at 12:09am
- estreeter
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- online
- 6,137 Posts. Joined 6/2009
- Location: Oz
- Select All Posts By This User
Again, I'm forced to work from the opinions of others, but I suspect that only a chosen few will be in a position to compare all 3:
- if you can afford the SR-71 Blackbird, get it
- if you can afford the P-51 Mustang, get it
I did find an SR-71 in Singapore recently but the asking price was hilariously high - I think it was just there to drag people in the door. By contrast, the D4 I purchased here in Thailand yesterday came in at about the same price I would have paid in Aussie dollars with shipping added, and that is well under the landed price of one of the RSA amps. If you want something that sounds good straight out of the box, I'd look further afield than Ray's amps. I know it has been a huge FOTM, but thus far I am very happy with mine - as always, if you use sensitive IEMs or have preferences which dont align with a particular amo, this may or may not be your best option.
- if you can afford the SR-71 Blackbird, get it
- if you can afford the P-51 Mustang, get it
I did find an SR-71 in Singapore recently but the asking price was hilariously high - I think it was just there to drag people in the door. By contrast, the D4 I purchased here in Thailand yesterday came in at about the same price I would have paid in Aussie dollars with shipping added, and that is well under the landed price of one of the RSA amps. If you want something that sounds good straight out of the box, I'd look further afield than Ray's amps. I know it has been a huge FOTM, but thus far I am very happy with mine - as always, if you use sensitive IEMs or have preferences which dont align with a particular amo, this may or may not be your best option.
post #5 of 32
2/12/10 at 12:40am
- stefanus
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 39 Posts. Joined 5/2007
- Location: Surabaya
- Select All Posts By This User
is form factor will be your big concern? if it is not, i suggest you to buy SR71A or predator (with DAC).
if you need "really portable" amp that sound great and will use it only with IEM and earphones, then shadow is the best choice. Also shadow has already using digital potentiometer and it is the latest tech in recent portable amp.
if you need "really portable" amp that sound great and will use it only with IEM and earphones, then shadow is the best choice. Also shadow has already using digital potentiometer and it is the latest tech in recent portable amp.
- googleli
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 2,037 Posts. Joined 12/2008
- Location: Hong Kong
- Select All Posts By This User
Thanks guys. Do these things have a 3.5 mm hole? By the way, how do Tomahawk and Hornet fit into the picture? Are they superior or inferior to Shadow / Mustang? Many thanks!
post #7 of 32
2/12/10 at 1:10am
- shigzeo
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 10,290 Posts. Joined 8/2006
- Location: Japan
- Select All Posts By This User
I consider the SR71 to be one of the best portable amps every made. It is a classic that will never be forgotten or go away. Glad Ray is supporting it still with updates.
- googleli
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 2,037 Posts. Joined 12/2008
- Location: Hong Kong
- Select All Posts By This User
Hi Shigzeo, how does SR71 match with CK100?
post #9 of 32
2/12/10 at 1:40am
- estreeter
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- online
- 6,137 Posts. Joined 6/2009
- Location: Oz
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:
|
I consider the SR71 to be one of the best portable amps every made. It is a classic that will never be forgotten or go away. Glad Ray is supporting it still with updates.
|

post #10 of 32
2/12/10 at 2:08am
- shigzeo
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 10,290 Posts. Joined 8/2006
- Location: Japan
- Select All Posts By This User
Well, I don't have one, but everytime I've used on, it has stood out among a bunch of other amps.
post #11 of 32
2/12/10 at 2:23am
I have the Sr71a, Mustang, and the Predator. I have also listened to the Shadow. The Mustang is the one I am using now. Mustang and Shadow are two similar that I cannot tell two much different, but the Mustang has a little bit more power thus allow one to use more headphone besides iem. The SR71a is a nice amp but it is much more bigger. The Predator is nice with a DAC especially if you are using it with a computer. I do prefer the Mustang over the Predator for its personal, dynamic feel.
post #12 of 32
2/12/10 at 2:44am
- AVU
- Trader Feedback: +18
-
- offline
- 778 Posts. Joined 12/2009
- Location: Brooklyn
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:
|
Thanks guys. Do these things have a 3.5 mm hole? By the way, how do Tomahawk and Hornet fit into the picture? Are they superior or inferior to Shadow / Mustang? Many thanks!
|
just remember, Shadow is only for high efficiency cans
- googleli
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 2,037 Posts. Joined 12/2008
- Location: Hong Kong
- Select All Posts By This User
Thanks all for your great advice.
I bought myself a pair of e-Q7 and a Ray Samuel Black Bird SR71A portable amp today as my own Chinese new year present.
I always thought my CK100 would be my last pair of universal IEMs since I ordered UE18 Pro last month. The 18 Pros are yet to be shipped (pending "arrival of a component" according to UE), and now I got e-Q7... This should really be my last pair of universal IEMs, I hope. So far, e-Q7 really gives completely different sound from CK100. Trying to burn in both e-Q7 and the RSA Black Bird using the STS Kharma burn-in CD now. Can anyone give me the approximate burn-in time for the e-Q7 and the Ray Samuels Black Bird?
By the way, would the Black Bird be enough to drive the HD800's? I am planning to get one later in the year.
I bought myself a pair of e-Q7 and a Ray Samuel Black Bird SR71A portable amp today as my own Chinese new year present.
I always thought my CK100 would be my last pair of universal IEMs since I ordered UE18 Pro last month. The 18 Pros are yet to be shipped (pending "arrival of a component" according to UE), and now I got e-Q7... This should really be my last pair of universal IEMs, I hope. So far, e-Q7 really gives completely different sound from CK100. Trying to burn in both e-Q7 and the RSA Black Bird using the STS Kharma burn-in CD now. Can anyone give me the approximate burn-in time for the e-Q7 and the Ray Samuels Black Bird?
By the way, would the Black Bird be enough to drive the HD800's? I am planning to get one later in the year.
post #14 of 32
2/12/10 at 12:13pm
The Blackbird need about 300 hours to sound great and I did not notice any difference after 700 hours. It can certainly "power" HD800 but not drive it to it full potential. Out of all the RSA amps you mentioned, I like Mustang out of all of them. I only sold it to fund the up coming Protector purchase.
- googleli
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 2,037 Posts. Joined 12/2008
- Location: Hong Kong
- Select All Posts By This User
Thanks. 300 hours means I have to use 12 batteries... Kind of expensive when it piles up... Btw anyone experiences background hissing? If background hissing occurs should I turn down the gain (e.g. from med to low) and increase the volume instead? It works but not totally eliminating the hiss. On my new Ortofon e-Q7 the hissing is more obvious but on my CK100 there is no hiss.
By the way, is there an agreed good portable source that matches the Black Bird or the RSA portable amps in general? Many thanks.
By the way, is there an agreed good portable source that matches the Black Bird or the RSA portable amps in general? Many thanks.
Return Home
Back to Forum: Portable Headphone Amps
- RSA P71 vs Shadow vs Mustang?
Currently, there are 2105 Active Users
(448 Members and 1657 Guests)
Recent Discussions
- › Help choosing between these IEMs. Please. :( 47 seconds ago
- › The Official Horror game Thread!! Lets put those headphones to... 1 minute ago
- › 「Official」Asian Anime, Manga, and Music Lounge 2 minutes ago
- › Explain your avatar 3 minutes ago
- › ++RECOMMENDATIONS THREAD++ i.e. Don't start a new thread: ask for... 3 minutes ago
- › Samsung Galaxy S Sound Quality 3 minutes ago
- › [REVIEW] Audiofly AF78 Hybrid IEM: A Very Brave Proposition 4 minutes ago
- › Mission: Replace the HiFiMAN ear pads with other brand ear pads 5 minutes ago
- › Fostex TH900 Impressions & Discussion Thread 5 minutes ago
- › Best headphone & amp for ambient music 5 minutes ago
View: New Posts | All Discussions
Recent Reviews
- › Cowon C2-16BS 16 GB Video Player, Black with Silver by burninmind
- › BRAINWAVZ HM5 Studio Monitor Headphones by Night Crawler
- › Shure SE535LTD RED by sue4
- › Aurisonics AS-1b by Kunlun
- › HiFiMAN HE-400 by project86
- › Pioneer SE MJ31 by jojexy
- › Grado SR60i Headphones by Smiling Jack
- › Final Audio Design Adagio V by SpringBiscuit
- › Matrix Quattro Dac by shipsupt
- › Sennheiser HD 800 Headphones by DannyRox23
View: More Reviews
New Articles
- › iBasso DX100 FAQ by DoctorHeadz
- › DIY Cable Info and Resources by Pingupenguins
- › Asr Head-Fi Threads Compendium by Asr
- › Headphone Buying Guide by keanex
- › Fostex T50RP modification summary LINKS - wiki by jgray91
- › Comparisons of the LCD-3 and the LCD-2 Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Posting Guidelines by Currawong
- › Comparisons of LCD-2 Rev. 1 and Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Membership Levels, Badges and Custom Titles by Currawong
- › Sennheiser Hd4 8 Modding For Newbies by koolkat
View: New Articles | All Articles
Home | Head Gear | Forums | Articles | My Profile
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map





