Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Skullcandy
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Skullcandy - Page 9

post #121 of 136
12/21/10 at 4:27pm

Yeah...I just read all his previous posts...pretty funny and sad.

Reply

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #122 of 136
12/21/10 at 4:37pm

I again uphold the sound quality of the SK Pro. Although I have to admit that they would be no match against the similarly priced M50...

Reply
post #123 of 136
12/22/10 at 12:01am
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3602 View Post

I again uphold the sound quality of the SK Pro. Although I have to admit that they would be no match against the similarly priced M50...



Your joking, right?

Reply
post #124 of 136
1/9/12 at 7:23pm
Dude nothing from skullcandy is worth it except mix master and avatars... SOUND QUALITY AND BUILD QUALITY DON'T EVEN JUST FACEPALM:)
Reply
post #125 of 136
1/9/12 at 7:49pm

Dude, this thread is a year old, I think he figured it out by now.
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Phoenix View Post

Dude nothing from skullcandy is worth it except mix master and avatars... SOUND QUALITY AND BUILD QUALITY DON'T EVEN JUST FACEPALM:)


 

Reply
post #126 of 136
1/9/12 at 7:51pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by GigaFi View Post

Dude, this thread is a year old, I think he figured it out by now.
 



 



D@wG, I believe dat foo did

Reply
post #127 of 136
1/22/12 at 6:30am

tried out smoking buds today. my ears were ruined. and the guy told me that SC are the best phones around and that I don't know nothing about headphones cause I don't listen to techno. perhaps he listens to dubstep too.

Reply
post #128 of 136
10/25/12 at 11:08am

ummmmmmm. sound quality is very good for tweety kind of stuff. but for bass you just wanna kinda, NO. they have no real clarity either so youd want to probably get him the skullcrushers. built in subwoofers hard to go wrong on that. best cheap thing the skullcandy has ever done.

Reply
post #129 of 136
10/28/12 at 6:10am

IMO, the ONLY good product SK ever made is the Full Metal Jackets.  Granted, they're earphones and not headphones, but I love the bass that comes out of them.  The overall sound isn't too bad either.

 

IMO you should go to a better brand like Koss or Sennheiser if you want to get your friend some decent cans.  I own 3 pairs of SK headphones and they all sound terrible.  But, if you insist on getting SK's drop the headphone idea and just get some FMJ's.

Reply
post #130 of 136
11/26/12 at 4:46am

Unfortunately for this sight...most people here are prejudiced toward anything they have never tried. I have a pair of Aviators and I will put them up against any 300US headphones on the market. I have lost money on expensive headphones too often to buy them. I have been a lurker here for months and all the members here are too narrow minded to give anything a chance. I am starting to believe the people here are working with the manufacturers to advertise for their products that in my opinion are way overpriced. Buy what you want and enjoy music. Don't listen to folks on here that are narrow-minded. 

Reply
post #131 of 136
11/27/12 at 10:19pm
I just won a pair of aviators, and I have put them up to my Senn Hd595s. The aviators lost badly. In fact, they performed so poorly I'm trying to determine if my unit is defective or they just sound this way. As to members on head fi being narrow minded, have you actually read some of the epic reviews members have posted here? Everything from comfort, sound, fit, finish and value have been discussed.

Also, due to the nature of music preference and "sound" preference, it's not unlikely that there will be debate as to how a particular headphone sounds. Unfortunately, skullcandy has a track record of poor quality and funky design over solid sound. If this does change, I'm sure it will be discussed on headfi before anywhere else.
Reply
post #132 of 136
12/21/12 at 9:58am
Quote:
Originally Posted by swiebeba View Post

I just won a pair of aviators, and I have put them up to my Senn Hd595s. The aviators lost badly. In fact, they performed so poorly I'm trying to determine if my unit is defective or they just sound this way. As to members on head fi being narrow minded, have you actually read some of the epic reviews members have posted here? Everything from comfort, sound, fit, finish and value have been discussed.
Also, due to the nature of music preference and "sound" preference, it's not unlikely that there will be debate as to how a particular headphone sounds. Unfortunately, skullcandy has a track record of poor quality and funky design over solid sound. If this does change, I'm sure it will be discussed on headfi before anywhere else.

The HD595 costs double the price of the Aviator. Besides which, the Aviator doesn't compete against the HD595, it competes against Beats and other "stylish" headphones.

 

I haven't heard the Aviator, however many describe its sound as good(not great). In the stylish realm though not awful sound is usually good enough for great success.

 

The Skullcandy Aviator Roc Nation is now $115 on Amazon. While I probably wouldn't buy one, at that price I could see many being interested in it.

Reply
post #133 of 136
12/22/12 at 12:03am
You're comparing a closed headphone to an open one. That's already a fail. If you wanna compare, it should be closed vs closed, open vs open.

Love how people are quick to jump on Skullcandy with improper comparisons.

I may have hated the Lowriders, but I certainly like demoing the Aviators, Mix Masters, and really, really like the Slyr. They are making great strides in making their headphone line legitimate.
Edited by Mad Lust Envy - 12/22/12 at 12:10am
Reply
post #134 of 136
12/22/12 at 9:46am

I have seen reviews of SK headphones improving lately and that with some models they're finally stepping it up some. I still think overall that they, like many other "stylish" brands have terrible/weird/childish designs and focus more on that than on sound quality.

 

The only one I've tried recently was the Aviators (previously it was some of their $20-30 on-ear and around-ear ones which sounded horrendous, worse than anything else), and they didn't sound bad, but they didn't sound like $115 headphones either. Maybe for $50-75 they would be worth it. Certainly better than most of their previous stuff.

 

I'll see if I can find the article but I did see where SK was at some audio convention and a few reviewers didn't expect much but were pleasantly surprised by newer models, and I think the SK reps had said something about a change in the way the company is handling their headphones now (more focus on SQ). I'll believe it when I see it, but the Aviators may be a step in that directly, if only they price them better.


Edited by xx0xx - 12/22/12 at 9:48am
Reply
post #135 of 136
12/22/12 at 9:51am
Their SLYR gaming headset is legit, I assure you. It's only $80, and they are a good headphone, period.
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Skullcandy