Quote:
Originally Posted by googleborg 
an analogue sounding digital cable with little or no sonic signature, i'm confused.
thanks for the review anyhow
|
What I meant by "analog sounding" is that it is natural sounding and free from digitis.
If were to make an analogy with dac chips, I would say that the Stereovox XV2 sounded like a sigma-delta chip while the Oyaide sounded like the PCM1704UK chip. If you have never listened to the PCM1704UK (or maybe a NOS dac), you can leave OK with any modern delta sigma chip. However, once you listen to a better and more natural dac, you can't help but notice the digitis (or hard an not so natural timbre) on most delta-sigma chips. It is not because the data is converted into analog at the end that it necessarily mean it is "analog sounding" (like real life or a high end turntable)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon L 
Interesting point 
Stereovox XV2 does not have any metallic edge in my system, and I've been meaning to try out their new XV Ultra. Then again, this Oyaide is cheaper than XV Ultra...
|
It is possible that my system (and my hearing) was overemphasizing that slight metallic edge that was apparent non amplified instruments (violins, pianos, ...) and on well recorded material. On some other kind of processed music, it would probably go unnoticed.
I also was able to pinpoint that weakness because I have tried 3 other high end cables that were more natural sounding (Sobek, Actinote Aria, Oyaide). If I didn't listened to those cables for long periods in my system, I probably wouldn't have noticed anything.
Finally, system matching is very important. I am sure that in some system combinations (tube gear, ...) the Stereovox XV2 would do the job properly. But in my mind it won't be as accurate as the Actinote Aria or the Oyaide DB-510. The new Stereovox Ultra looks very intersting but is a lot more expensive than the Oyaide.