DSP-1 vs. DF1704
Since everybody seems curious about how the 2 digital filters, I asked Kingwa and here is his (long) answer :
The DSP1 is applied high speed FPGA , I have asked a lot technician how about FPGA and moto DSP56000, they agree the FPGA is better for digital audio than the Moto DSP56000 line up. The FPGA has long life and high speed , and the configure is better than DSP56000 in digital audio system.
The DSP1 has very low phase change. And our DAC applied 6DB/oct analogy filter, (a lot other brand all use 12DB/oct or 18DB/oct filter), 6DB/OCT has low phase distortion than 12DB.
The DF1704 I have applied a lot years, I find the slow roll off sound more neutral and more detail the sharp roll off. And slow roll off has lower phase distortion.
The DSP1 compare to DF1704, just like our RE1 and the DAC9MK3, they has same configure but only different of the DSP1 and DF1704. The sound is a bit different. The DF1704 is a little bright side, the DSP1 is neutral, the PMD100 is a little warm side. But the DSP is a bit more detail and dynamic and better extend on low and high.
There was around 30 owners use our DAC8LE upgrade to DSP1 and find better sense, this is a direct compare.
Kingwa
Having tried both the PMD100 and DF1704, I agree with with Kingwa's description of the PMD100 being slightly on the warm side and the DF1704 being slightly on the bright side.
So it seems that the DSP-1 is "more neutral", more detailed, more dynamic and with better extension at the highs and lows... Very tempting! I am probably going to have to upgrade to the dac19-DSP at some point
