Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › HD800 versus D7000 (with poll)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

HD800 versus D7000 (with poll) - Page 8

post #106 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by SP Wild View Post
I always felt the fatigue had come from the treble emphasis of the phone - but now I realise that it is in fact the artificially inflated headstage that gives me this problem. I also feel that details are exagerrated - I have heard all the details so nothing new here - except they are thrust upon the foreground when I feel they should be in the background. Granted I rarely listen to audiophile recordings. These songs were in my CD

I wanted HD800 to at least sound like a Senheisser. After a minute of listening the only option I felt I had was to remove the headphone - the disorientation was very severe.
I think there is an interesting point here. Some people want headphones to sound like "headphones", the traditional, concentrated in-your-head sound signature. Many of the newly designed phones try (with some limited success) to more closely emulate the presentation of speakers, and I suppose that can be disorienting if you are expecting headphone sound!

I am not infering that there is anything wrong with this preference, BTW. If you feel this way, the HD-800 can very easily come across as unwanted culture shock!

The ultimate expression of the old-time, concentrated sound is the (vintage) DT-48, in my view. This phone makes NO concession to modern practice. It is unabashedly a headphone, no concession to soundstage (the image is resolutely focused in your head), no extended bass, limited treble extention and complete emphasis on it's midrange quality without compromise. Which makes it a facinating headphone, in my view. Essentially NO ONE would make a headphone like this today which makes it unique unto itself. But it's what Nagra said you should use to monitor recordings made through their exotic recorders, FWIW...

Kevin

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #107 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by subtle View Post

The HD800 has bass far superior to the D7000. It goes lower and hits harder.

 


What setup is responsible for this fact? normal_smile%20.gif

post #108 of 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lan647 View Post



Quote:
Originally Posted by subtle View Post

The HD800 has bass far superior to the D7000. It goes lower and hits harder.

 


What setup is responsible for this fact? normal_smile%20.gif


I also agree with subtle, I have auditioned a Denon AHD7000 before and think that the bass is not as strong as the HD 800. I could be wrong as the HD 800 is very amp dependant and will sound very different if driven by different setup. Btw, Im using the Amb M^3 and the Carat Ruby DAC for the setup.

post #109 of 114

Guess an E7/E9 and a laptop/stereo receiver won't do then. :P

post #110 of 114

HD800 vs D7000

 

How is this even a fair match? They don't cater to the same genres/listeners whatsoever.

 

That's like an expensive matchup that reminds me of something like the:

 

AD700 vs XB700

 

WTF... they are in the 'same' price range, yet are VERY different from one another.

 

Something that makes more sense would be the T1 vs HD800...


Edited by Mad Lust Envy - 12/31/10 at 6:27am
post #111 of 114

It's a fair match since we're not talking technical advantages as much as personal preferences...

post #112 of 114

Which one of these is the best match for movies?

post #113 of 114
D7000 is easy to listen. Best all around for me.
post #114 of 114

Come on, somebody must know..? MacedonianHero for example, you are using/have used both...

 

Edit: And how good is the D7000 when it comes to tracking? 


Edited by Lan647 - 1/5/11 at 3:25pm
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › HD800 versus D7000 (with poll)