Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Members' Lounge (General Discussion) › Do You Want Your Rig To Sound Thick Or Thin?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Do You Want Your Rig To Sound Thick Or Thin?

post #1 of 18
Thread Starter 
In my quest for the best sound I have been able to hear lots of rigs. Each set-up is a work of art. Each set-up is at times many years of thought and money. When you hear someone's rig you are at a point in audiophile life to make an opinion. What you do is try and act like the sound signature is nice even though it may not be for you. Maybe some of the best judgments happen after a prolonged time to hear the subtleties. Every system has good and bad sides. I would guess that there are no perfect systems out there. There may be some amazing ones which knock your socks off. Even then there are systems which will take the sock knockers down.

So what people do most of the time is make compromise. What? Yes, most of us here have made a compromise in sound quality. Few will admit it here. If we were to list the defects, we could see. The defects are always there. Most would say they have reached a great value for the money. The value for the money group is one group of people here. The next group of people are the ultra high end. These people always get the benefit of that old saying around here, "At that level it is only what sound you are going for, they are all good systems." Is this really true? I don't know?

This brings us to the title, " Do You Want Thick Or Thin Sound?" This may seem like a really dumb thing to make a thread about? Everyone wants a big thick sound, right?

The truth is the best systems that had a knack at getting all the detail down were thin. It seems to my ears the whole mid-bass, muddy-water, thick bass has an effect of covering a lot of high-mid detail. So now when I hear other peoples systems which at first seems to have a thin a sound, I think again.

Every time we hear a new system we bring all of our lifetime of sound history with us. Every time you see a new sight on the street you use your whole life history of vision/recognition to make micro-judgments untill you reach an opinion that makes complete sense! This is how the mind works. The problem is that it can be misleading. There is also another factor which has to do with sound conditioning. Try on a pair of rose colored glasses for half an hour. When you remove them everything will look light blue for a while. The relationship of sound can do this to if you hear something which has a complete change to your ears.

People out there have these really thin sounding systems and they are completely in love with them.(AKG k701s) To get the effect take your EQ and mess around till you get all highs. There would be a great experiment to do at a Head-Fi meet where you choose a song in I-Tunes and bring up the EQ window. Now have everyone there mess around with the EQ till they thought it was correct for the song. Some would have high bass. Some are purists who are never going to move a single slider around. So maybe this is not the perfect test. Most of us do all our EQs with the equipment and cables anyway. The I-Tunes EQ would show everyone has a sound signature preference.

How many times have you been at a live show and hated the bass but your friend just loved it? This is almost at the point of favorite color choices. Everyone has a favorite color and no one is wrong. OK, lets not go that far. We have all heard expensive systems which sounded like @#$%^%^&*. What a place in life to be in, the person is all excited like it is his new born son and asks, "What did you think?" "Killer huh?" At many places in life the little that you say the better. This is one of those places. Well one benefit of putting up with this rambling post is now you have a way out. Just remember it is just as they like it. Unless they are totally mislead and have gone down an unfortunate road like all of us audiophiles have at times. You know Beta Tapes,Laser Disks, Casette Tapes,Mini Disks, shall I go on? Oh yes, green CD pens, Surround Sound HI/FI, DTS, Silver Cables, and the best one which is buying old musical instuments which amplify the tonal resonances around the room and add to the sound quality. Someday we will have bottles of placebo pills which make everything sound better. Oh, they do make those now but we can't talk about it here. The same goes for the system where there is more bass than your local AMC cinema. They have all that crazy rumble which makes your head tickle and covers over everthing but the major highs. This is where I am at with my system now. So for along time I would make fast opinions about what other people loved in the high treble zone. After looking only for slam and authority in excess, I am starting to see the strong points of these thin sounders. What is your opinion?
post #2 of 18
I don't want to hear my rig. I want to hear the music.
post #3 of 18
What you say reminds me of the old ads for Rectilinear speakers, which compared the West Coast Sound (accompanied by an illustration of a grinning hippie) and the East Coast Sound (illustrated by a middle-aged couple dressed for a cocktail party). Perhaps the old Monty Python skit with woody versus tinny sounds would also be apt. I like the thinner sound of my Stax, and also the slightly thicker sound of my Senns.

The nature of the music being listened to might dictate the choice of thick or thin.
post #4 of 18
Neither, thanks.
post #5 of 18
I don't like either of these adjectives. If I was to qualify what I was looking for, it would be a thin sounding headphone - but that does not mean I will be receiving thin sounding music.

Instead, what I will be receiving is an accurate representation of the performance or studio result. I'll have a backup low-fi headphone (over romances stuff and forgives easily) for my bad recordings.

I disagree that the nature of the music dictates whether or not you need a thick or thin sounding headphone (slow and long decay/fast and short decay), at least in the sense that is the music that lends it to a particular representation. Instead the variation is in your own personal preference for a particular genre as thin will always be the most accurate to the recording, and ideally the recording is an accurate representation of live.

When you get to things like wanting the sound of a particular venue, such as a concert hall you find where slow and large decay headphones are pretty useful, or say if the recording was done with very "thin" (hate this word) microphones in a padded room and you wanted to say, move it to a living room sort of sound then sure.

When you apply a slow headphone to a bad recording you approach a sense of euphony through distortion of the signal, which is not something I am particularly after consdiering my taste in music is generally well recorded and I want to hear the music crisp and clear.

I can't honestly think of a "thin" headphone that I have tried without serious technical difficulties that makes music sound "lifeless", nor a "thick" headphone that "brings life" to a dead recording.

My problem with slow headphones with large decay is that they homogenise recordings and reduce how dynamic my library is. Thin, neutral headphones do not do this.

I find so much of the audiophile lexicon inept, as I feel a lot of it applies negative connotations to something that isn't even close to negative.

Happy mediums are always welcome.
post #6 of 18

Pops Right again

Quote:
Originally Posted by TopPop View Post
Neither, thanks.
Thin nor Thick! I want my recorded music sounding as close to the same way the singer/player recorded it into the mic/s.. I do like your story though!
post #7 of 18
I would like it neutral,neither thick nor thin, just the way it was supposed to be
post #8 of 18
Kirosia would prefer a little more junk in his musical trunk
post #9 of 18
Thinck!
post #10 of 18
I largely agree with the OP's post, but would like to point out that there's a lot more going on here than meets the eye. In traditional direct manner:

1) People hear differently: Everyone has different shaped ears. This alone means that each of us will hear things completely differently when we put on headphones because the shape of the human ear itself will cause crazy changes in the high end frequency response of a headphone that nothing can measure.

2) Some people can't hear, or struggle to: My dad has hearing damage. He likes things horrendously bright by my ears because it sounds best to him. I, on the other hand, have very sensitive hearing (I had it tested, it's well above average), which I largely consider a disadvantage because I have a very low tolerance for high frequencies and loud sound in general and most people like things just a tad bit brighter than I do (I consider my HF-2's to be a little bright, even). I'll go over to a rig and listen to it at 9:00 where most people are jamming it up to 1:00 or a sound level that I can't tolerate at all. This means that even for people with normal hearing, my opinions are probably skewed in some way. This causes a lot of problems on these boards and differences in opinions because people will think the other poster is nuts when in reality it's all based on perception.

3) People hear different things: You're basing your thick and thin on your favorite styles of music. Mine are likely completely different. If I had my choice, I'd have a rig for every style of music I listened to. I love the DT880's for pipe organ music...I think they're virtually perfect for that. But for classic rock, I want Grado HF-2's. Classical? Give me some Sennheiser HD800's. Each of these headphones in my opinion trounces the other in that particular genre.

4) The grand total is a compromise: and NOBODY will agree on what that compromise should be, I can guarantee it. You've already placed peoples' rigs into two categories: "thick" and "thin", which I will elaborate for you as having less and more treble respectively, since changes to one side of the frequency spectrum will obviously affect the other. But perhaps you're not the only one with these opinions, and others simply prefer their rig because it is the best compromise for their preferred music.

Basically, meets are crazy and you most certainly will hear huge variances in sound qualities. Use it to your advantage. Only listen in detail to rigs which you seem worthy and learn from them. Head-Fi meets are freaking awesome because the sheer amount of information you can get out of them is incredible!

edit: 5) Speakers will always win.
post #11 of 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD1032 View Post
Speakers will always win.[/b]
Always? I think of headphones in the sense that a friend of mine once described a motorcycle, that it gave you all the thrills of a Ferrari, but at 1% of the cost. How much would I have to pay for speakers capable of doing what my Stax rig can do? Or perhaps speakers and headphones are such different hearing experiences, they should not even be compared.
post #12 of 18
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD1032 View Post
I largely agree with the OP's post, but would like to point out that there's a lot more going on here than meets the eye. In traditional direct manner:

1) People hear differently: Everyone has different shaped ears. This alone means that each of us will hear things completely differently when we put on headphones because the shape of the human ear itself will cause crazy changes in the high end frequency response of a headphone that nothing can measure.

2) Some people can't hear, or struggle to: My dad has hearing damage. He likes things horrendously bright by my ears because it sounds best to him. I, on the other hand, have very sensitive hearing (I had it tested, it's well above average), which I largely consider a disadvantage because I have a very low tolerance for high frequencies and loud sound in general and most people like things just a tad bit brighter than I do (I consider my HF-2's to be a little bright, even). I'll go over to a rig and listen to it at 9:00 where most people are jamming it up to 1:00 or a sound level that I can't tolerate at all. This means that even for people with normal hearing, my opinions are probably skewed in some way. This causes a lot of problems on these boards and differences in opinions because people will think the other poster is nuts when in reality it's all based on perception.

3) People hear different things: You're basing your thick and thin on your favorite styles of music. Mine are likely completely different. If I had my choice, I'd have a rig for every style of music I listened to. I love the DT880's for pipe organ music...I think they're virtually perfect for that. But for classic rock, I want Grado HF-2's. Classical? Give me some Sennheiser HD800's. Each of these headphones in my opinion trounces the other in that particular genre.

4) The grand total is a compromise: and NOBODY will agree on what that compromise should be, I can guarantee it. You've already placed peoples' rigs into two categories: "thick" and "thin", which I will elaborate for you as having less and more treble respectively, since changes to one side of the frequency spectrum will obviously affect the other. But perhaps you're not the only one with these opinions, and others simply prefer their rig because it is the best compromise for their preferred music.

Basically, meets are crazy and you most certainly will hear huge variances in sound qualities. Use it to your advantage. Only listen in detail to rigs which you seem worthy and learn from them. Head-Fi meets are freaking awesome because the sheer amount of information you can get out of them is incredible!

edit: 5) Speakers will always win.


THX. Well put.
post #13 of 18
I want my rig to sound natural. Better yet - I don't want to hear my rig.
post #14 of 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazarus Short View Post
Always? I think of headphones in the sense that a friend of mine once described a motorcycle, that it gave you all the thrills of a Ferrari, but at 1% of the cost. How much would I have to pay for speakers capable of doing what my Stax rig can do? Or perhaps speakers and headphones are such different hearing experiences, they should not even be compared.
I'm saying it's a different experience. I listen to speakers for something completely different to headphones.
post #15 of 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by LFF View Post
I want my rig to sound natural. Better yet - I don't want to hear my rig.
Indeed. Hence the reason I've spent very little time on this forum since the JH13!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Members' Lounge (General Discussion) › Do You Want Your Rig To Sound Thick Or Thin?