Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Any open-cans that sounds like the ATH-M50 and HD650 got married and had a kid?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Any open-cans that sounds like the ATH-M50 and HD650 got married and had a kid? - Page 3

post #31 of 43


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lunatique View Post

 

 

I'll tell you a little story. When I took the Denon AH-D7000 on a trip with me when I visited various headphone specialty shops in Hong Kong and Taiwan, I tested boutique headphone amps like the Corda Symphony.2 and SPL Phonitor. I did the most laughable test, which was to simply compare how the D7000 sounded out of those amps to the headphone out of my Creative Zen player. The D7000 isn't even high impedance, but it still required me to crank the Zen player's audio to the max. You'd think there would be a dramatic difference--I mean, we're talking about headphone amps that cost more than a thousand dollars. The truth is, upon initial swapping, it might seem like the amps sounded a little bit more refined, but it's such a vague impression that I couldn't even put my finger on exactly how and where the refinements are. Is it the transients? Is it the frequency response? Is it stereo imaging? Is it distortion? Noise? Coloration? After swapping several time times between the amps and the Zen player, I wasn't even sure there were differences anymore--sometimes I think I hear differences, and sometimes I don't. That's how subtle or inconsequential the difference are. To me, if it requires immense concentrated focus to hear any kind of subtle differences, and you are actually contemplating spending big money to get something that requires you to strain that hard to hear your fast dwindling diminishing returns, then you are deluding yourself. There are much, much better uses for that money. Take a step back and reassess your priorities in life, because at that point, you've lost all objectivity. Think about what else you can do with that money you're about to throw away on improvements you can barely hear.

 


I wonder if your findings would have been the same if you had the HD650 instead.

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #32 of 43
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by olor1n View Post

 

I wonder if your findings would have been the same if you had the HD650 instead.


HD650 is definitely harder to drive than the D7000, so if I'm already maxing out the volume of the Zen player with the D7000, I wouldn't even be able to drive the HD650 to adequate volume. But, let's say if I were to use my el cheapo Behringer MiniAmp or Samson C-Control to drive the HD650 (which they do a perfectly fine job of), then I think the result would be very similar--I'd be straining hard to try to hear the differences between the expensive boutique amps and the mass-produced el cheapo pro audio gear, and then wonder why I'm not hearing "night and day" differences that justifies the $1,000+ price tag. This is exactly why diminishing returns are so insane. You'd think that the el cheapo stuff would sound absolutely abysmal, but they don't, and in fact they make you wonder why the hell you'd want to throw away over a thousand dollars on differences you can barely hear most of the time--especially that the moment you stop doing A/B'ing, you'd never miss a thing. (Who the hell does constant A/B'ing in real life when watching movies, playing games, and listening to music anyway?)

post #33 of 43
I actually agree with most of your views but I suspect it may be taken to the extreme conclusion that there is no benefit at all to improving one's chain (even if you confine yourself to cheaper components). People have a tendency to throw the baby out with the bathwater around these parts.
post #34 of 43
Edit: duplicate created when editing post above.
post #35 of 43
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by olor1n View Post

I actually agree with most of your views but I suspect it may be taken to the extreme conclusion that there is no benefit at all to improving one's chain (even if you confine yourself to cheaper components). People have a tendency to throw the baby out with the bathwater around these parts.


In that case, I must make it clear that one must assess for himself how much he's willing to spend to achieve improvements, and since we all have different financial capabilities, one man's severe diminishing returns is another man's logical upgrade.

 

I mentioned previously that you must spend according to the context of your passion/bank account. The greater your passion and bank account, the more you would be willing to accept diminishing returns, but if you just want a pretty nice sounding headphone to rock out with and to play video games and watch movies, then don't obsess over little things because they really don't matter in the grand scheme of things. If you are a serious/passionate musician/composer or an obsessed fan of music--to the point where you'd list these endeavors very high on your list of priorities in life, then yes, obsess all you want. If you have money to burn, then burn away--we're not going to tell you to give them to charities instead. :D

 

I'm not saying there is no improvement when you upgrade, but just be careful and use your critical judgment. How expensive something is is not a reliable indication of whether it will make a real difference in your situation. If you can't hear it or must concentrate hard to hear the differences, then it's not worth it. But if you can hear the differences very clearly and it's definitely an improvement, and you can accept the amount you'd have to spend, then that is when it's worth it.

 

 

post #36 of 43
Words of wisdom. But this is Head-Fi and there's no place for that here. wink.gif
post #37 of 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by olor1n View Post

Words of wisdom. But this is Head-Fi and there's no place for that here. wink.gif


 LOL. Too true, sadly.

post #38 of 43
This is why I wouldn't upgrade my E9 for something more expensive anytime soon. As a transparent amp that has been known to power the HE6 and K1000 (though not optimal), I can't see any reason to upgrade from it UNLESS I started getting into those truly high end headphones (which won't happen until I win the lottery.)

The only reason I can logically sidegrade from the E9 is to get a tube amp to color my headphones, which I DON'T wanna do.

Now my E7 can definitely be upgraded, which I'm sure will be the more noticeable sound improvement, and right now, I have no pressing need to do so. I'm incredibly happy with it. Id only upgrade it for a DAC that does 24bit...

Id rather get new headphones than spend a stupid amount of money to SLIGHTLY improve the sound I currently have with my headphones.
post #39 of 43

Lunatique, I agree totally with your sentiments. In fact I've expressed the same in many threads, often to a less than friendly reaction. Just to be clear, I didn't mean to suggest that the 650 can be easily driven by the HP output on any old portable CD player; I was thinking more of integrated amps that can often be got used on Ebay, making a cheap system. I've never felt a need to go beyond that level, and when I've listened to dedicted HP amps (not Cmoys) I've heard no difference to my integrated at home. This I think is the advice that should be offered to cash-strapped newbies.

The objection is often raised that the high output impedance of generic HP jacks may cause FR aberrations. If that's true of some phones (I've never actually heard it in practice) it's certainly not true of the 650 or, I presume, other high impedance phones, which seem to be quite immune. That being the case, I'd like to take a look at a specific example of matching that I have at home: the 650 driven by a Marantz PM5003 integrated.

The 5003 has had at least one rave review (in Stereophile). I think it's not stretching things too far to say that, with a relatively easy, non-reactive load like the 650, it should be quite close to a straight-wire-with-gain, certainly if we accept the assumption above about immunity to output loading. That being the case, in what area is this amp inferior to an expensive dedicated amp? Current delivery? Like most quality integrateds the 5003 has a decent power supply with large transformer, certainly sufficient for a headphone. It also has vanishingly low measured distortion and the ability to bypass tone and balance controls for purists. So...where's the problem? Maybe I've missed a vital area of consideration, but in the absence of someone pointing it out, I'm content to listen to this combination without feeling I'm missing anything.

What I'm trying to say is, I keep reading about Bursons and Darkvoices with an overlaid assumption that anything less than these is an insult to a quality phone like a 650, and frankly, I don't get it. I've started threads about using non-dedicated amps and received quite a hostile reaction. S P Wild, if I may take his name in vain, recently started a thread whose premise was that he could hear no difference between amps, and found it quite difficult to make any headway through the flack. This happens all the time; it's as if some anti-heresy movement is afoot. Sorry if I sound over-dramatic, but it can get quite frustrating.

 

Enough ranting. Loved your posts in this thread; at least one should be made a sticky for newbies to check out before posting.

 

post #40 of 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by pp312 View Post

Lunatique, I agree totally with your sentiments. In fact I've expressed the same in many threads, often to a less than friendly reaction. Just to be clear, I didn't mean to suggest that the 650 can be easily driven by the HP output on any old portable CD player; I was thinking more of integrated amps that can often be got used on Ebay, making a cheap system. I've never felt a need to go beyond that level, and when I've listened to dedicted HP amps (not Cmoys) I've heard no difference to my integrated at home. This I think is the advice that should be offered to cash-strapped newbies.

The objection is often raised that the high output impedance of generic HP jacks may cause FR aberrations. If that's true of some phones (I've never actually heard it in practice) it's certainly not true of the 650 or, I presume, other high impedance phones, which seem to be quite immune. That being the case, I'd like to take a look at a specific example of matching that I have at home: the 650 driven by a Marantz PM5003 integrated.

The 5003 has had at least one rave review (in Stereophile). I think it's not stretching things too far to say that, with a relatively easy, non-reactive load like the 650, it should be quite close to a straight-wire-with-gain, certainly if we accept the assumption above about immunity to output loading. That being the case, in what area is this amp inferior to an expensive dedicated amp? Current delivery? Like most quality integrateds the 5003 has a decent power supply with large transformer, certainly sufficient for a headphone. It also has vanishingly low measured distortion and the ability to bypass tone and balance controls for purists. So...where's the problem? Maybe I've missed a vital area of consideration, but in the absence of someone pointing it out, I'm content to listen to this combination without feeling I'm missing anything.

What I'm trying to say is, I keep reading about Bursons and Darkvoices with an overlaid assumption that anything less than these is an insult to a quality phone like a 650, and frankly, I don't get it. I've started threads about using non-dedicated amps and received quite a hostile reaction. S P Wild, if I may take his name in vain, recently started a thread whose premise was that he could hear no difference between amps, and found it quite difficult to make any headway through the flack. This happens all the time; it's as if some anti-heresy movement is afoot. Sorry if I sound over-dramatic, but it can get quite frustrating.

 

Enough ranting. Loved your posts in this thread; at least one should be made a sticky for newbies to check out before posting.

 


Sounds like you're not missing out on much. Check this out if you haven't already read through it. I especially like his assessment of the Audio-GD Fun vs the beta22. blink.gif

post #41 of 43

Thanks, I hadn't read that thread, but I'm not surprised by the findings. I'd love to see a whole range of comparisons, maybe comparing $200 amps to $2000 ones. Could be revealing.  

post #42 of 43

Well he effectively did that with the Fun vs beta22 comparison. The Fun serves as a DAC and pre-amp as well, so if you took those features away you could perhaps devalue the cost of the amp section to that bracket. It's pretty telling that a thread like that garnered little attention though.

post #43 of 43

As one of the numerous college students on here, Lunatique, I found your advice absolutely invaluable. You should definitely make a dedicated thread for new-comers/spenders with the advice you've written in this thread alone. I've been thinking about getting the HD650's to compliment my M50's and got sucked into the idea that you NEED a high-powered amp to go along with them. Up until reading through here, I never even considered just going for the HD650's and skipping the amp. Your advice has certainly helped me take a step back and think logically before dumping my life's savings (at this point) into audio gear that I don't necessarily need.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Any open-cans that sounds like the ATH-M50 and HD650 got married and had a kid?