New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

You can now review stuff on HeadRoom!

post #1 of 18
Thread Starter 
Sweet, let's see where this can lead to!
post #2 of 18
I know right!?!

I posted 2 reviews already..... The K81 and ER6i. The ER6i review was bad though
post #3 of 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by iHelp View Post
The ER6i review was bad though
+1

I just gave the ER6i 2-stars
Etymotic ER-6i Black | HeadRoom Audio
post #4 of 18
Thread Starter 
Alright, this is starting to dismiss my slight intention towards purchasing an ER-4S...
post #5 of 18
Keep them product reviews coming, ya'll!



Cheers,
jorge
HR Service & Sales Manager
HeadRoom was founded in 1992 & manufactures headphone amps, DACs, and accessories; and sells headphones & related personal audio gear. We offer exceptional products, customer service, & information.
Reply
post #6 of 18
Thread Starter 
¿Habla español usted? Is that right?
Jorge sounds Spanish to me... please correct me if I'm wrong
Also, do I have the right to review a product that I purchased elsewhere?
post #7 of 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3602 View Post
Also, do I have the right to review a product that I purchased elsewhere?
Yes, as long as the product is the same as what is sold on the Headphone.com site. They just don't want reviews of counterfeits. (A disproportionately high number of negative reviews for a highly-rated product often leads to the suspicion that some of those reviews are for counterfeit, or fake, versions of that particular product or for the wrong product entirely.)

Thus, if Headroom carries that particular brand and model of headphone, it's okay to post a review there. If they don't carry that particular item, then don't submit a review of that product to their site.
post #8 of 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoulSyde View Post
+1

I just gave the ER6i 2-stars
Etymotic ER-6i Black | HeadRoom Audio
Hey. Your review didn't make much sense.

The SQ doesn't mean you did/didn't like the sound signature. OBVIOUSLY, it's the quality.

Read more carefully.
post #9 of 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by iHelp View Post
Hey. Your review didn't make much sense.

The SQ doesn't mean you did/didn't like the sound signature. OBVIOUSLY, it's the quality.

Read more carefully.
I just read that review. Obviously, too many review sites are filled with people who post one- or two-star reviews (out of five) merely saying that they did not like the sound signature of the reviewed product. Well, that is not the right way to rate sound quality. But if it sounds more or less the same no matter the equipment, and the "piercing highs" sound scratchy and etchy rather than detailed, then the product would have definitely lost points in the sound-quality rating. (I would have deducted only one star from the rating if the sound is merely too bright. But if it sounds both bright and screechy at the same time, then I would have given it a low rating.)

Also, the reviewer might not have realized that the reviewed product sounded that way because he or she might not have listened to that product on the right equipment to begin with. After all, if most iPods roll off the bass, and the ER-6i sounds neutral or slightly cold, then the two add up to an overly aggressive (frigid) sound. Remember, in this particular case, synergy between source/amp and earphone is to blame. As such, I would have withheld my review or rating until I tried that same earphone on other equipment.

Having said that, I submitted a five-star review on my most recent headphone purchase, a Sennheiser PX 100-II, after owning it for less than a day. Sometimes, a product comes along that catches my fancy and impresses me from Day One on most if not all types of equipment (and would likely still impress me after months or years of listening); thus, such an early review is valid. (I go by a different handle over there than here at Head-Fi - but you get the idea simply by looking at my listed home town.)
post #10 of 18
It'd pretty hard to review the quality of a certain sound when you don't like that sound to begin with.

Anyways, I (Wilhelm) did a review of the AKG K 701.
post #11 of 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eagle_Driver View Post
I submitted a five-star review on my most recent headphone purchase, a Sennheiser PX 100-II, after owning it for less than a day.
Yer such a push-over.




Just kidding, that is a great little headphone.
post #12 of 18
Hi All,

Just a last minute reminder that our HeadRoom 'customer comments-product review' contest ends February 14, 2010 so get your last minute submissions in to get entered into our drawing for the free HR Desktop Amp/DAC + Sennheiser HD650 headphones!

Lots of great reviews are already in; thanks so much for all the thoughtful comments & insights into the gear!


Cheers,
Jorge
HR Sales & Service Manager
HeadRoom was founded in 1992 & manufactures headphone amps, DACs, and accessories; and sells headphones & related personal audio gear. We offer exceptional products, customer service, & information.
Reply
post #13 of 18
bump.

HeadRoom product review submissions contest ends SUNDAY!

Cheers,
jorge
HR Sales & Service Manager
HeadRoom was founded in 1992 & manufactures headphone amps, DACs, and accessories; and sells headphones & related personal audio gear. We offer exceptional products, customer service, & information.
Reply
post #14 of 18
Hi All-

Well, we're up to over 700 reviews, thanks again everyone for the awesome participation.

I wanted to clarify that we'll run the contest to the END OF DAY February 15th, NOT the 14th ... so you guys have until midnight Mtn.Standard Time on Monday Feb. 15th to submit reviews. WOOP!!
HeadRoom was founded in 1992 & manufactures headphone amps, DACs, and accessories; and sells headphones & related personal audio gear.
Reply
post #15 of 18
700!? There go my hopes of actually winning anything! XD Lucky fellow he who emerges victorious =P
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: HeadRoom Premier Sponsor Forum