Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidMahler 
As much as I love Coltrane, it's quite funny seeing Love Supreme listed there, and yet I cannot dispute, I think its an amazing work.
I'm not really sure what the best entry point for Mahler is. I think something that's very important is going with a very strong interpretation on your first shot.
If you already adore the Rite of Spring then dissonance may not scare you away from Mahler's later's works and I would suggest trying the 9th Symphony first, though it is a rather final-sounding work. If you go with this try Karajan's 1984 version, it has a photo of him on the cover framed in a pencil line gold.
The 5th symphony comes sort of at a central point in his composing career. It covers a lot of ground dynamically, stylistically, emotionally and it probably is the greatest starting point, it was my starting point, but that said, I certainly don't think it is his greatest work.....he probably has 4 or 5 symphonies that I think are superior. If you go with this try Rudolph Barshai's performance, it's the only one in my opinion....I don't listen to any other version and I own 28 of them.
A lot of people would recommend you try the 2nd Symphony first. Today it is his most popular work and maybe the most beloved symphony outside of Beethoven world-wide. It showcases a chorus and two vocal soloists in the last two movements. Also, from an audiophile standpoint, this is the single piece of music which best tests not only your equipment, but also a concert hall, a sound engineer's abilities and even the microphones they use when recording it. There are a lot of top notch performances, and some sound better sonically than this recording, but Zubin Mehta's 1975 recording with the Vienna Phil is without a doubt the best on record.
If you want to be daring, try 2, 5, 9 and I would also suggest symphony 4 for an entirely different sounding Mahler (try Ivan Fischer's recording).............if you hear these 4 works and don't love it, then Mahler is probably not for you. If you must only try one, make it the 5th or 9th.
|
heh heh, yeah I liked the incongruity of listing Coltrane there. Mostly though I took the "greatest" in more of a historical or musical significance way, as it's hard for me to separate music from the context it appears in. So that also accounts for selections like Rite of Spring, selections that I think historically might be more significant and lend to their "greatness," while in reality, for just sitting down and listening, I actually prefer his more neo-classical stuff, for example.
Same idea for Prelude - there might be more monumental or "greater" works than that, but Debussy really helped usher in a new era and I think was a *huge* influence beyond what might be recognized generally, accounting for his greatness. And Bach's WTC was arguably more hugely influential than anything, almost single handedly defining the entire scalar or interval schemata of western music. That's pretty great.
As for Mahler, thanks for the detailed response. I've heard bits and pieces of his symphonies here and there, on the radio, etc. and from the perspective of half-paying attention usually have found it interesting. I remember when I was reading a lot of Bukowski years ago he absolutely loved Mahler, and that always intrigued me and made me want to go check out some Mahler - just never got around to it for some reason.
But like I said regarding Stravinsky, and from what you can probably glean from me mentioning Debussy, I tend to go more for that airy kind of impressionistic or atmospheric music rather than the really heavy thematic kind of works. I really detest opera, for example - just can't get into it no matter how many times I try - while I usually really like ballet music. So maybe that helps narrow down what Mahler might be best to start with, otherwise I'll just go for the 2nd. Although then I will be curious to hear how the 4th is so different. In what way does that depart from his usual sound? Maybe if it leans more impressionistic that would be better. And by impressionistic I don't necessarily mean pastoral, either. Maybe atmospheric is the best word. I also really like listening to film scores, for example. Thanks

p.s. that list sounds fantastic. definitely post that.