Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Members' Lounge (General Discussion) › Equations - at it's best
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Equations - at it's best

post #1 of 21
Thread Starter 
Equation 1

Human = eat + sleep + work + enjoy
Donkey = eat + sleep

Therefore:
Human = Donkey + Work + enjoy

Therefore:
Human - enjoy = Donkey + Work

In other words,
A Human that doesn't know how to enjoy = Donkey that works.

** Equation 2 **

Man = eat + sleep + earn money
Donkey = eat + sleep

Therefore:
Man = Donkey + earn money

Therefore:
Man - earn money = Donkey

In other words
Man who doesn't earn money = Donkey

** Equation 3 **

Woman= eat + sleep + spend
Donkey = eat + sleep

Therefore:
Woman = Donkey + spend
Woman - spend = Donkey

In other words,
Woman who doesn't spend = Donkey

To Conclude: From Equation 2 and Equation 3

Man who doesn't earn money = Woman who doesn't spend

So Man earns money not to let woman become a donkey!

And a woman spends not to let the man become a donkey!

So, We have:

Man + Woman = Donkey + earn money + Donkey + Spend money

Therefore from postulates 1 and 2, we can conclude

Man + Woman = 2 Donkeys that live happily together!

PLEASE IGNORE IF U R MARRIED.....
post #2 of 21
EQn 1 and 2 have diff values for Man.
Didn't you just post a thread that people thought was spam, or are you trolling us again with your FAIL jokes.
FAIL because an equation with multiple values for one variable can't be the best example.
Also I think the sexism makes this offensive to anyone, not just people who're married, so placing that at the bottom gives another reason to think you're winding us up.

It's still funny though.
post #3 of 21
The classic needs to be taken out of the shadows:
post #4 of 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by P4Z View Post
EQn 1 and 2 have diff values for Man.
Didn't you just post a thread that people thought was spam, or are you trolling us again with your FAIL jokes.
FAIL because an equation with multiple values for one variable can't be the best example.
Where do you see multiple values for one variable? The first expression is for 'Human', the second is 'Man' and the third is 'Woman'. 'Donkey' has the same value in all 3 instances.
post #5 of 21
donkeys often work harder than people.

so i would say that the second part of the first equation should be "donkey = eat + sleep + work"

so that pretty much throws a wrench into the entire proof. back to the drawing board.
post #6 of 21
wat.
post #7 of 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by progo View Post
The classic needs to be taken out of the shadows:
Damn your being faster than me! I saw this thread and that old equation immediately popped into my head!
post #8 of 21
also, you used the contraction "it's" rather than the possessive "its."
but you're referring to equations, plural, so really it should be "their."
post #9 of 21
post #10 of 21
^LOL
post #11 of 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by fenixdown110 View Post
He's only 3 off
post #12 of 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by VicAjax View Post
also, you used the contraction "it's" rather than the possessive "its."
but you're referring to equations, plural, so really it should be "their."
Apparently, it's acceptable when offering advice on grammar:

http://www.head-fi.org/forums/6186202-post3.html
post #13 of 21
Love this one.

The following is an actual question given on a University of Washington chemistry mid term examination paper. The answer was so "profound" that the professor shared it with colleagues, which is why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well.

Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?

Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law, which is that "gas cools off when it expands and heats up when it is compressed" or some variant.

One student, however, wrote the following:

First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate that souls are moving into Hell and the rate they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving.

As for how many souls are entering Hell, lets look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there are more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell.

With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially.

Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand as souls are added.

This gives two possibilities:

If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose.
Of course, if Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.
So which is it?

If we accept the postulate given to me by Ms. Teresa Banyan during my freshman year, "...that it will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you.", and take into account the fact that I still have not succeeded in having sexual relations with her, then option 2 cannot be true, and thus 1 am sure that Hell is exothermic and will not freeze.

The student received the only A.
post #14 of 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by logwed View Post
Love this one.

The following is an actual question given on a University of Washington chemistry mid term examination paper. The answer was so "profound" that the professor shared it with colleagues, which is why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well.

Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?

Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law, which is that "gas cools off when it expands and heats up when it is compressed" or some variant.

One student, however, wrote the following:

First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate that souls are moving into Hell and the rate they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving.

As for how many souls are entering Hell, lets look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there are more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell.

With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially.

Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand as souls are added.

This gives two possibilities:

If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose.
Of course, if Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.
So which is it?

If we accept the postulate given to me by Ms. Teresa Banyan during my freshman year, "...that it will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you.", and take into account the fact that I still have not succeeded in having sexual relations with her, then option 2 cannot be true, and thus 1 am sure that Hell is exothermic and will not freeze.

The student received the only A.
Brilliant! hahaha This one never gets old.
post #15 of 21


New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Members' Lounge (General Discussion) › Equations - at it's best