Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Shure SRH440 Impression
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Shure SRH440 Impression - Page 27

post #391 of 405

Just got the hm5 pads and it sounds a lot better than the srh840 pads. The comfort is way better than the stock pads, softer, better seal on my ears. The sound is quite impressive, deeper bass, larger soundstage, smoother upper mids / highs, it's definitely more balanced now. But to get good sound u need to rotate the pads in the right angle though.

 

I'm using a very budget setup - hifimediy u2 async dac + smsl sap lll, very good sound so far.


Edited by rhiga - 7/11/14 at 7:23pm
post #392 of 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhiga View Post
 

Just got the hm5 pads and it sounds a lot better than the srh840 pads. The comfort is way better than the stock pads, softer, better seal on my ears. The sound is quite impressive, deeper bass, larger soundstage, smoother upper mids / highs, it's definitely more balanced now. But to get good sound u need to rotate the pads in the right angle though.

 

I'm using a very budget setup - hifimediy u2 async dac + smsl sap lll, very good sound so far.


Can you give me a link for where I can order them?

post #393 of 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonzeanse View Post


Can you give me a link for where I can order them?

 




http://www.mp4nation.net/brainwavz-hm5-spare-earpad-1pc
post #394 of 405

I still don't get it , why srh440 are soo underrated,¿maybe because they don't cost a ton?,dunno, but they're amazing, i clearly prefer them over my sony ma900, the senn hd600 (i know that those cans are open, but they do cost a lot more), and bose quiet comfort, the flat response is just amazing, ofcourse the other headphones have bigger soundstage and made the virtualization of instrument better, but at the  end of the day the sound that those boys do is better for me.

post #395 of 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by baadaq View Post
 

I still don't get it , why srh440 are soo underrated,¿maybe because they don't cost a ton?,dunno, but they're amazing, i clearly prefer them over my sony ma900, the senn hd600 (i know that those cans are open, but they do cost a lot more), and bose quiet comfort, the flat response is just amazing, ofcourse the other headphones have bigger soundstage and made the virtualization of instrument better, but at the  end of the day the sound that those boys do is better for me.

 

I prefer my modded SRH440 over my Q701 my a large margin. They have better bass, better resolution and a more enjoyable response curve than the Q701. They are more comfortable and block outside noise better by being a sealed headphone. But I was still talked down in my first days on this forum for saying such things, as if the only way to compare headphones was using their price tags. I said I could hear the difference between MP3 and FLAC and I was attacked with "I don't believe her, she's got the SRH440". Seriously. As if a pair of 100$ headphones was unable of such a feat simply for being 100$. Cause you totally need to waste 2000$ on headphones alone (not counting another few thousands on a DAC, an amplifier and cables) to hear the difference between lossy and lossless audio.

 

(And I'm probably gonna get attacked here too for having said such things.)

post #396 of 405
I agree with both of you ;D i even prefer the 440 + 840 pads over the srh840, because of better bass (mote kick & texture). The 440 even sounds more detailed because of more treble energy. Its on par with the dt880 for me, even resolution wise.

I really like the 440 in stock version unmodded. But only at home. But at home i prefer my t90, its even better in every way. But for the outside...i haven't found a better can than the 440s yet , except the T5p.......but that one is much more expensive. Too expensive to be used as a portable outside i think.

I realised, that the 440 looses much of its bass when used outside. At home or in buildings the bass is perfect for me, very tight & deep impact. But outside it looses some of that wonderfull bass. It looses even more ~ almost all of it, when you wear wool-hats / caps etc in winter. So i did the bass mod (i removed the pads and closed the holes ( all of them) because i only use the 440s outside. I'm more than happy with the sound, soundstage widened and the bass is (for me) unmatched.

I have 2 another new pairs just in case if the 440s are discontinued some day.
post #397 of 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoulMisaki View Post

Japanese Pop and Electropop are music genres too, dont be such a retard. People can listen to what they want and those genres are just as good as any others YOU listen to. Probably better.

Yes. I went there.

:ph34r:

post #398 of 405

Hi All,

 

I am new to the forum and relatively new to "better than default headphones, that came with the phone" audio, ordered the SRH-440 with 840 pads to complement my new FiiO X1 :) The sound absolutely amazing and the X1 has no problem driving them at about 50-60% volume. I've listened to a bunch of headphones in the $100-$250 range and picked the 440 almost without a doubt.

 

My problem is that, I guess, I'm not used to such detailed image and I am going crazy adjusting EQ on different albums. My biggest problem is the highs, there's just too much of it on many recordings (I mostly listen to classical and metal... yeah...). Makes my ears hurt. 

 

Another problem is sometimes the bass becomes very... how do I put it... fatiguing... or rather nauseating, like my ears temporarily stop hearing anything else... 

 

Usually, I add a bit to 162, 400 and 800, leave the 1 and 3 Khz at 0 and then either add or (usually) decrease the 8 and 16 Khz. But I find I have to adjust it on virtually every album. Am I being too picky? :)

 

I've always listened to my music rather loud, but I am finding that it's not necessary with the SRH-440

 

I'm sure my ears will adjust to them soon

post #399 of 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by temchik View Post
 

Hi All,

 

I am new to the forum and relatively new to "better than default headphones, that came with the phone" audio, ordered the SRH-440 with 840 pads to complement my new FiiO X1 :) The sound absolutely amazing and the X1 has no problem driving them at about 50-60% volume. I've listened to a bunch of headphones in the $100-$250 range and picked the 440 almost without a doubt.

 

My problem is that, I guess, I'm not used to such detailed image and I am going crazy adjusting EQ on different albums. My biggest problem is the highs, there's just too much of it on many recordings (I mostly listen to classical and metal... yeah...). Makes my ears hurt. 

 

Another problem is sometimes the bass becomes very... how do I put it... fatiguing... or rather nauseating, like my ears temporarily stop hearing anything else... 

 

Usually, I add a bit to 162, 400 and 800, leave the 1 and 3 Khz at 0 and then either add or (usually) decrease the 8 and 16 Khz. But I find I have to adjust it on virtually every album. Am I being too picky? :)

 

I've always listened to my music rather loud, but I am finding that it's not necessary with the SRH-440

 

I'm sure my ears will adjust to them soon

It's got some pretty serious driver ringing at 4k, that's a lot of what makes the SRH440 sound so sharp, especially at higher volumes.

post #400 of 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by metal571 View Post
 

It's got some pretty serious driver ringing at 4k, that's a lot of what makes the SRH440 sound so sharp, especially at higher volumes.

 

Thanks! I'll try the 3K slider instead

post #401 of 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by temchik View Post
 

 

Thanks! I'll try the 3K slider instead

Unfortunately, ringing cannot be fixed by EQ. It is the tendency of the driver to continue vibrating at that frequency rather than an actual bump in the frequency response magnitude. You can somewhat alleviate it but the headphones will always sound upper-midrangey cause of it. I struggled for a long time to understand why they sounded strange...the CSD on this page explains it.

 

http://en.goldenears.net/GR_Headphones/7264

 

Enormous ringing centered at 4k. It's also super visible on the impulse response.


Edited by metal571 - 2/20/15 at 2:31pm
post #402 of 405

Ha, interesting... that CSD diagram might also explain the bass problems I am having?

post #403 of 405

Anyone listening to these with some bass boost EQ? I noticed these measure similar to well regarded phones from 300Hz and up.

 


Edited by markanini - 4/10/15 at 9:39pm
post #404 of 405

Yeah but the ringing kind of kills the mids.

post #405 of 405

I subtracted Shure SRH440 measurements with Focal Spirit Pro measurements from Tylls site and made a EQ from it. This adds some full yet controlled bass presence that these headphones lack, and smoother highs.

 


Edited by markanini - 4/15/15 at 8:21pm
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Shure SRH440 Impression