Originally Posted by GTL
Sonically how are they different?
Sorry guys - just received my [high strand count] TWag cable, and it's burning in.
Craig says to give it 150 hours - but I intend to give it a critical listen at 50, 75 and 100 hours, respectively.
I can vouch for Pfillion's claim that, out of the box, it's a bit "muddy" - but that is totally expected.
Owners emphatically state: the SCSCag cables open up to provide Awesome performance, from top, to bottom end - after burn-in.
Haven't listened to the SCSCag [solid core].
But Pfillion has both - maybe we can ask him for a comparison of SQ, after his TWag burns in.
He raved about the SCSCag - darn him - which is what got me into this mess, in the first place!
fwiw: I think Aftermarket Cable Guru's seek to find a limp / flexible stranded cable, that sounds as good as a stiffer solid core cable.
(but, what do I know?)
PS: there was a UPS SNAFU when my TWag cable was delivered.
Let me state, for anybody "on the fence" about purchasing, from Craig @ Whiplash Audio:
The way Craig handled a situation that wasn't his fault; and his unwavering commitment to his customer - were both extremely noteworthy. Result: he earned a dedicated / repeat customer here (that's IF, this darn thing ever burns in; omg, another 120 hours! Don't know if I can make it! - lol).