Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Bose On-Ear TriPort Review!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Bose On-Ear TriPort Review!

post #1 of 24
Thread Starter 
Cue the Galactic Empire theme song.

Anyway, quite sick of the Bose bashing that takes place because of their overpriced surround sound systems and shady marketing; so I decided to make a review of Bose's best hidden-gem. No, not the huge, gigantic Over-Ear flimsy TriPort, but the small, low-profile, comfortable On-Ear TriPort.


The TriPorts in their case, as you can see they fold up very nicely.


After the complaints Bose received regarding their expandable headband, they put a black piece to keep the metal from breaking.


My favorite part since the cord is small and flimsy, you can easily replace the cord with a new one if it breaks.

Build Quality & Aesthetics
Like all Bose headphones, the TriPorts are plastic. Unfortunately, Bose didn't feel the $180 price tag warranted some nicer materials, which is ridiculous, but whatever. The cord is also pretty cheap, however, you can easily change cords. The only really good part of the build quality is the new improved headband, in which Bose put a large piece of thick black plastic on the metal expander to keep it from breaking. There is a nice piece of suede to keep them comfortable on the head.

Overall, they look pretty nice even if they are cheaply made. They look fine around my neck and look fine on my head. They are much lower profile than my Grados, or the other super-commercial headphones Skullcandy, which is a great positive. And since Bose knows how to make things look modern without looking stupid, I don't look like someone from 2081 when wearing them.

Comfort
Here's where the Bose really shine. The material is an extremely soft pleather covering with a small hole in the middle covered with permeable plastic to let the music flow. By design, the pleather fits right up on your ears, giving the trademark bass response of the headphones. I wore these on a lengthy flight from Houston to Cleveland with about a bajillion stops in between, and pretty much never took them off. They are excellent for long trips. The cool pleather keeps your ears from overheating, and since they are on-ear and not over-ear, you wouldn't have that problem anyway.

Sound Quality
The sound quality on the Bose is actually quite intriguing-the bass is extremely heavy and the highs are extremely clear. Straying away from Bose's normally thick and heavy mid-range, they seem to focus more in on the punch of the low-end, which is amazing, mind you. When you have a bass-heavy song, it seems as if the headphones are vibrating off your head, but you still feel the kick of the drum pedal or the grunge of a bass guitar. The lows are, by far, the best I've heard for a sub-$300 headphone.

Usual to Bose, you can pretty much blast these at any level from any source with little or no distortion at all. That always has impressed me about Bose, and these are no different. At all levels, they seem nice to listen to and never fatiguing or shrill. I enjoy that aspect, which is why I listen to them for extended-period listening.

It's quite hard to differentiate instruments on a loud passage with the Bose as they tend to be quite compact and close-range. There isn't much of a soundstage, as you pretty much seem thrown right in the middle of the front row at a rock concert with these headphones. So, it all comes as a thick wash of sound when listening...not as thick or crisp as my Grados, but loud and truly enjoyable.

I think the sound on these is an excellent alternative to my Grado and MartinLogan electrostat in my room. These are more fun and pure, not obsessing over every detail. These are amazing when I want to listen to some of my more mindless rock music, and while they still sound good, my Grados out-duel the Bose in my more experimental and dark ambient choices.

Conclusion
Overall, the Bose feel a little cheap and are a little on the pricey side. ($125 or $150 is more appropriate) However, the sound is unusual and fun. It's a thick wash of sound perfect for your more simplistic rock music and for just enjoying music without any 'in-depth' listening. They are just my 'fun headphones'. The comfort is unparalled, however. They also do an alright job of sound isolating because the pads are so close to your ears.

Overall, these are a 7/10.

Overall, the sound quality is a little uneven and a little muddy (more than likely because of the On-Ear design)
post #2 of 24
If these were <100 dollars I would have bought them instead of my SR60's
I don't mind the Bose sound, and I agree with you that they have excellent aesthetics, I just think they are over priced.
post #3 of 24
Nice written review. Thanks for sharing!
My opinion is that the Bose products sound quite decent, but are somewhat overpriced for what they deliver in comparison to several other brands.
post #4 of 24
Nice impressions and good to know that you're enjoying your purchase.
post #5 of 24
Somebody should review the Skullcandy Skullcrusherz with built-in subwoofer.
post #6 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebhelyesfarku View Post
Somebody should review the Skullcandy Skullcrusherz with built-in subwoofer.
You'd have to pay them for their ears then.
[My own review, based on about 20 seconds of listening to a friend's, is that they suck. A lot.]
post #7 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by tribestros View Post
Usual to Bose, you can pretty much blast these at any level from any source with little or no distortion at all.

...

It's quite hard to differentiate instruments on a loud passage with the Bose as they tend to be quite compact and close-range. There isn't much of a soundstage, as you pretty much seem thrown right in the middle of the front row at a rock concert with these headphones. So, it all comes as a thick wash of sound when listening...not as thick or crisp as my Grados, but loud and truly enjoyable.
The thick wash of sound you hear is distortion. With distortion the waveform is not accurately reproduced, which is also why you are having trouble picking out individual instruments and their staging.
post #8 of 24
Thread Starter 
Incorrect. The wash of sound comes from bass limiting the range of mids and highs.

Oh, and btw, I would have never bought these, they were given to me a while ago.
post #9 of 24
Bass shouldn't do this unless it is a distorted and attenuated mess. The D7000s, for instance, have a noticeable bass hump, but the resultant bass is clear and punchy, it takes nothing away from the other frequencies.
post #10 of 24
Thread Starter 
I know they shouldn't do this, but they do. The drivers simply aren't powerful enough to handle the lows and highs they should put out.
post #11 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by tribestros View Post
Sound Quality
The sound quality on the Bose is actually quite intriguing-the bass is extremely heavy and the highs are extremely clear. Straying away from Bose's normally thick and heavy mid-range, they seem to focus more in on the punch of the low-end, which is amazing, mind you. When you have a bass-heavy song, it seems as if the headphones are vibrating off your head, but you still feel the kick of the drum pedal or the grunge of a bass guitar. The lows are, by far, the best I've heard for a sub-$300 headphone.

Usual to Bose, you can pretty much blast these at any level from any source with little or no distortion at all. That always has impressed me about Bose, and these are no different. At all levels, they seem nice to listen to and never fatiguing or shrill. I enjoy that aspect, which is why I listen to them for extended-period listening.

It's quite hard to differentiate instruments on a loud passage with the Bose as they tend to be quite compact and close-range. There isn't much of a soundstage, as you pretty much seem thrown right in the middle of the front row at a rock concert with these headphones. So, it all comes as a thick wash of sound when listening...not as thick or crisp as my Grados, but loud and truly enjoyable.

I think the sound on these is an excellent alternative to my Grado and MartinLogan electrostat in my room. These are more fun and pure, not obsessing over every detail. These are amazing when I want to listen to some of my more mindless rock music, and while they still sound good, my Grados out-duel the Bose in my more experimental and dark ambient choices.

Conclusion
Overall, the Bose feel a little cheap and are a little on the pricey side. ($125 or $150 is more appropriate) However, the sound is unusual and fun. It's a thick wash of sound perfect for your more simplistic rock music and for just enjoying music without any 'in-depth' listening. They are just my 'fun headphones'. The comfort is unparalled, however. They also do an alright job of sound isolating because the pads are so close to your ears.

Overall, these are a 7/10.

Overall, the sound quality is a little uneven and a little muddy (more than likely because of the On-Ear design)
Oh man, where to begin. And this is just flagging the "Sound Quality" part of your review.

The highs are anything but clear on any BOSE headphone. That comes off as a sharp opinion at first, but I'm pretty sure this is the first time I've ever heard somebody saying that BOSE has "extremely clear" highs, so I doubt I'm alone with this exasperation. I'm especially surprised that you say this since you own a Grado already. What would you call those highs then?

For the bass vibration, the feeling of vibration doesn't equate to quality. You should change the wording to "The lows are, by far, the best I've felt for a sub-$300 headphone."

I don't think many people want to hear "washed up" sound for the price that BOSE is asking, but to each their own.

And how did you come to the conclusion that its because of the over-ear design of the headphone that the sound is like this? All the BOSE headphones follow the same sound signature; just walk into an Apple store and sample all the demo headphones hanging around.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tribestros View Post
I know they shouldn't do this, but they do. The drivers simply aren't powerful enough to handle the lows and highs they should put out.
Um...that makes no sense. You never listed what your source is. I'm guessing an Apple product or the onboard sound of your computer?
post #12 of 24
Thread Starter 
I'd say the Grados have a similar high to the Bose, but the Grados more realistic midrange and soundstage makes them better.
post #13 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by tribestros View Post
I'd say the Grados have a similar high to the Bose, but the Grados more realistic midrange and soundstage makes them better.
like the review. I'm still waiting for a true alternatives suggestion from the Bose basher's, but low an behold silence becasue rarely does any of them have any real experience of them. they're compensating!
Quote:
"Bose basher's are a fountain of misplaced rage. Name your cliche; Mother held him too much or not enough, last pick at kickball, late night sneaky uncle, whatever."
post #14 of 24
Thread Starter 
Yeah, they just make dumb and fake comparisons to make themselves seem smart.

I bow to their "genius"
post #15 of 24
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebhelyesfarku View Post
Somebody should review the Skullcandy Skullcrusherz with built-in subwoofer.
I had a brief listen to those at my local Busted Buy, and I was completely unimpressed with their sound. With the "subwoofer" off, the Skullcrusherz produce too little bass response--in fact, they sound worse than many smaller stock freebie portable headphones. (I'd estimate that the lowest frequency the Skullcrusherz could produce with the "subwoofer" off to be only 250 Hz--the bottom end of the lower midrange, not even reaching the upper bass.) With the "subwoofer" on, the Skullcrusherz produce too much mid-bass response (50 Hz) without bringing the upper bass response to match the rest of the sound--this results in a hollow, uneven sound across the audible spectrum. (In other words, there is a hole between 100 Hz and 250 Hz in their response curve, by my estimate.) The so-called "subwoofer" is a poor match to the rest of the headphone. And what midrange and treble that the Skullcrusherz produce is tinny and harsh.

In other words, not recommended by me. (And this coming from a person who has deemed even some of Skullcandy's in-ear models to be decent buys, let alone one who has listened to and liked a lot of higher-end headphones from the likes of AKG, Beyerdynamic, Grado and Sennheiser.)

As for the Bose On-Ears, I don't think they're worth more than one-third of their asking price, based on my brief assessment of the sound which came out of their earpieces.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Bose On-Ear TriPort Review!