Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › dvd-a or sacd
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

dvd-a or sacd - Page 5

post #61 of 71
1/9/10 at 12:54pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by macrog View Post
Its like going back to the old Beta VHS video tape wars. Beta was the better format but lost out due to politics.

DVD-A is superior in performance to SACD (and yes I have owned both) but SACD is the easier format to find music on (and thus has to be the winner)

Bluray audio is just another marketing scam to suck in consumers into rebuying music they already have.

I prefer downloading hirez recordings from the likes of Linn. I would very much like to see more high resolution subscription download services available.

Lets face it CD should sound awful per its technical specs (e.g. 150KB/sec) and yet it can sound surprisingly good.

Regards

Macrog
I would like to get into downloads as that seems to be the future, but the now is that I have about 8 or 9000 cds I would like to enjoy along with the many new releases still coming out, and am eager to hear ri-rez music. Still uneasy & uniformed about aspects of computer based music as well, like durability, user-friendliness and setup-ease.
So I believe I still need a player that can make my cds sound as good as possible and play some hi-rez formats as well.
Reply
post #62 of 71
1/9/10 at 2:38pm
Wow, I have 2700 CDs and it's driving my wife crazy. I'm curious how you store them. I'm currently getting rid of the jewel cases and putting them in plastics sleeves from Jazz Loft.

Sorry for the thread jack.
Reply
post #63 of 71
1/9/10 at 5:00pm

Network attached Storage units offer effective storage

Quote:
Originally Posted by billyearle View Post
I would like to get into downloads as that seems to be the future, but the now is that I have about 8 or 9000 cds I would like to enjoy along with the many new releases still coming out, and am eager to hear ri-rez music. Still uneasy & uniformed about aspects of computer based music as well, like durability, user-friendliness and setup-ease.
So I believe I still need a player that can make my cds sound as good as possible and play some hi-rez formats as well.
A network Attached Storage unit would securely store all your music and with raid features will not lose all your music if a drive fails.

Obviously keep the CDs and store them somewhere dry.

The initial ripping of CDs is the only hassle. It took me about 4-6 weeks to rip all mine. Computer as controller is great. Being able to access any track instantly is addictive and multiple playlists to match your mood or random play are great.

Macrog
Reply
post #64 of 71
1/10/10 at 8:29pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by scompton View Post
Wow, I have 2700 CDs and it's driving my wife crazy. I'm curious how you store them. I'm currently getting rid of the jewel cases and putting them in plastics sleeves from Jazz Loft.

Sorry for the thread jack.
Oh, I just take up all the wall space in the apartment with shelves everywhere. It is a constant challange keeping my 21 moth old boy away from them with various makeshift barriers.
Reply
post #65 of 71
1/10/10 at 8:33pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by macrog View Post
A network Attached Storage unit would securely store all your music and with raid features will not lose all your music if a drive fails.

Obviously keep the CDs and store them somewhere dry.

The initial ripping of CDs is the only hassle. It took me about 4-6 weeks to rip all mine. Computer as controller is great. Being able to access any track instantly is addictive and multiple playlists to match your mood or random play are great.

Macrog
This gives me hope that I will eventually go computer based, but I think I dont have time to figure it all out and rip my whole collection before moving in 6 months.
Further, since it appears you think I oughta hold on to my CDs anyway, I think I will be getting a Luxman SACD player this week, unless someone has a better suggestion.
Reply
post #66 of 71
1/10/10 at 8:47pm
It'll take more than 6 months to rip 9000 cds. I originally ripped my cds to either MP3 or AAC and it took me 6 months to do 1200 or so. For the last 2 and half years, I've been reripping to lossless. Unless you just accept what the ripping tool's database gives you for metadata, it's pretty time consuming.
Reply
post #67 of 71
1/11/10 at 1:32am
Quote:
Originally Posted by scompton View Post
It'll take more than 6 months to rip 9000 cds. I originally ripped my cds to either MP3 or AAC and it took me 6 months to do 1200 or so. For the last 2 and half years, I've been reripping to lossless. Unless you just accept what the ripping tool's database gives you for metadata, it's pretty time consuming.
Thanks, that's another reason I've resisted going computer, I just don't have much time since breeding. I am not deadset against it, but the technology seems to be evolving so fast, I think there may be an upside to my procrastinating nature.
Still looking for suggestions on solid state SACD or Universal players, but Luxman D-05 is still my frontrunner, and may order it tomorrow.
Reply
post #68 of 71
1/11/10 at 1:43am

I used multiple computers and ripped directly to NAS.

Quote:
Originally Posted by scompton View Post
It'll take more than 6 months to rip 9000 cds. I originally ripped my cds to either MP3 or AAC and it took me 6 months to do 1200 or so. For the last 2 and half years, I've been reripping to lossless. Unless you just accept what the ripping tool's database gives you for metadata, it's pretty time consuming.
I used 3 computers with 2 optical drives on each to cue rips and ripped directly to NAS. I put coloured stickers on any that were not identified correctly to correct later.

It worked fine for me. Yes I only have a couple of thousand though.

Macrog
Reply
post #69 of 71
1/11/10 at 2:08am
Well, you don't have to do it all at once. I ripped my Beatles boxed set (13 discs) in one evening, but that's probably the most discs I'd ever bother with in a single day. Just start with some of your favorites. Or, you could just decide to rip a disc the next time you feel like listening to it. That way, it would be years before you get around to some of them, and you may find that you don't have to rip every last one.
Reply
post #70 of 71
1/11/10 at 2:23am
since dvd-a are dead...
Reply
post #71 of 71
1/11/10 at 11:48am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gibertus Jeunus View Post
since dvd-a are dead...
Unless you already own some. I have one DVD-A only album and a few dual discs
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Dedicated Source Components
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › dvd-a or sacd