Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › Bithead:It's good... Real good. But can I get better?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Bithead:It's good... Real good. But can I get better?

post #1 of 10
Thread Starter 
Title revision: "*sounds* really good" - but since I don't have a lot of experience in high-end gear, I speak only relative to my limited experience, which is why I am looking for opinions

My current setup is a simple one: Macbook pro--->itunes--->bithead---->ad700 . I enjoy the sound a lot...but I do feel like it could maybe get a bit better... Would getting something like the v-dac result in a significant audible (as opposed to placebo-based/psychological) improvement from the bithead? I feel like the dynamic range could improve, as well as clarity of instruments when the texture is thick (despite it being very good right now with these lovely ad-700 cans.) I will be getting the audioengine a2's soon. Will the vdac make an audible difference there, do you think?

Opinions please. Should I save my 300 for something else? Would an amp upgrade be more wise at this point?

Please be as objective as possible~ :-)

Thanks in advance
post #2 of 10
I can only offer this:

- my Topaz makes a major difference to the sound from my Macbook Pro
- the reviews of the V-DAC have been overwhelmingly positive. Unfortunately, that isnt always a guarantee that it will work for you or me.

You have a significant advantage with the MBP - optical out from the headphone port. Unfortunately, the V-DAC and many others are USB-only : many here will argue that it makes no difference, but I prefer the sound of the Topaz using the optical connection. I dont know how you will take the signal from your DAC into the Bithead, but most will connect straight up to a stereo or AV receiver/amp.

The rest is straightforward - rip to WAV or a lossless format and research the different players available for the Mac to find which one is right for you. Good luck.
post #3 of 10
Thread Starter 
Actually e-street, please correct me if i'm wrong, but the v-dac looks like it has 2 optical inputs in addition to the USB. I realized the problem with using the bithead with the vdac...perhaps i should consider getting an amp, too...

It's true that it's not a gurantee that it will work for all people...I guess we have to take our chances sometimes. I'm usually a big skeptic in many things audio-related, but the the votes do seem unanimous with the v-dac... I guess, since I havent owned a whole lot of different audio equipment in the past, Im trying to get an idea about how much of an upgrade I can expect with a new "better" DAC.

Any more opinions would be most appreciated!

Thanks!
post #4 of 10
The AD700 is a good enough headphone, but $300 will take you to a different level of performance. I'd look at something like the DT880, HD-600 or HD-650. Your biggest performance upgrades always come from the transducer (well, second to recording quality).

After that, an amp capable of fully driving your headphones is next most important. I don't put a huge amount of weight on digital sources. Expensive ones sound good... but so do cheap ones. I noticed that by swapping components in and out of my rig. Even a $100 CD player sounds great with a good amp and good headphones.

On the other hand, running the vinyl rig (about $12k retail) into a portable amp and high end headphones doesn't sound good. Running the vinyl rig into the Zana with $20 Sony headphones (the ones I don't care about frying when testing a new amp) sounds like crap. And running a good source, amp and headphones off a bad recording sounds like crap.

So I'd upgrade headphones first. That will net you the biggest improvement. The AD700 is not bad, but I've heard a lot better. Then look for a good amp and you can worry about the rest later.
post #5 of 10
I was underwhelmed by the Bithead. I would feel that a better DAC/Amp would probably provide you a noticeable benefit. I haven't heard the V-DAC though but I did have a Bithead for a while.
post #6 of 10
PianoForte, you are correct on the optical - my mistake.
post #7 of 10
I have the slightly lower Carat amp dac in the series than estreeter and I must say it is impressive.
post #8 of 10
Carat make good DACs, but I am less impressed with the amp section. Still a wonderfully compact solution for my purposes, but it needs to be mated to a separate amp, and I think they realised that when they configure the outputs. I run mine into my integrated amp and its a very good combo.

From this point forward, its separate DAC and amp for me.
post #9 of 10
I don't like the amp either. It's only so-so. I'll use it as a dac and pair it with a tube amp.
post #10 of 10
Thread Starter 
Quote:
The AD700 is a good enough headphone, but $300 will take you to a different level of performance. I'd look at something like the DT880, HD-600 or HD-650. Your biggest performance upgrades always come from the transducer (well, second to recording quality).
UncleErik: I was just about to say that I think I might prefer the ad-700 over the hd-600 (i used to own the 600), but i realized there could be the argument that I didn't amp them (the 600's) well. At one point, I tried a x-can v8, which was great, but I had to sell it to fund a trip i wanted to take. I was with the rega ear and valab dac for a while, which sounded great, but I really enjoyed the wide soundstage that the ad700 had to offer. The hd-600 definitely had more detail, though...just felt more narrow than the ad-700. Part of this probably had to do with how tightly the hd-600's grasped my head compared to the ad-700 (which mentally translated to being more narrow.) If I like this sound could you (or anyone, of course) recommend a sound signature similar to the ad-700 that is more detailed as well as more general improvements upon everything?

Thanks for all the great responses! Sorry that this is slightly going away from Source Forum material...
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Dedicated Source Components
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Dedicated Source Components › Bithead:It's good... Real good. But can I get better?