|
It's good to hear another opinion on this -- Thanks, CapQ. It is indeed all about the music. I'm blissing out to Frank Zappa's Hot Rats as I type this...
![]() |


Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
It's good to hear another opinion on this -- Thanks, CapQ. It is indeed all about the music. I'm blissing out to Frank Zappa's Hot Rats as I type this...
![]() |


|
I'm pretty certain that the 16/44 limitation is related to a limitation on the chip which passes the USB data to the DAC itself. As such, I don't think you'll do any better with Mac or Linux... Sorry!
If you want to pass 24/96 to the LD, I'm pretty sure you'll have to get a sound card or something similar that can pass SPDIF out of your PC to the DAC. (This changes the value proposition a bit, but I think most USB DACS are similarly limited for the time being [Dacmagic and Benchmark for example].) |
|
Based on this figures, MKV and MKVII should be night and day in term of available voltage swing for your HD650 (basically, twice as much):
MKV: 187mW @ 300 ohms, gives 7,5 Vrms, which is equivalent to 21 Volt peak to peak MKVII: 800mW @ 300 ohms, gives 15,5 Vrms, which is equivalent to 45 Volt peak to peak |
|
Bear in mind that the MKVII rating is while in balanced mode, which is good for nearly twice the voltage swing, and by extension, almost four times the power. I don't believe I've ever seen its rating for single-ended output, but it's possible that it could be as little as 1/4 of its balanced output rating.
|
|
Bear in mind that the MKVII rating is while in balanced mode, which is good for nearly twice the voltage swing, and by extension, almost four times the power. I don't believe I've ever seen its rating for single-ended output, but it's possible that it could be as little as 1/4 of its balanced output rating.
|
Despite this helpful review and a few other useful comments dotted around head-fi, there doesn't seem to be a wealth of experience with or opinion on this DAC. None the less I was encouraged to read the words 'neutral' and 'detailed' in a number of the observations that do exist and decided to take the plunge. I'll be pairing it with the Little Dot MK IV SE - so there's an obvious synergy (if only cosmetic) and convenience here - and the HD 650. The only other external DAC I have any experience with is the uDac, so it'll be interesting to see how the two compare - though obviously given the price difference, I'm hoping the DAC_I will bring a lot more to the table.

Despite this helpful review and a few other useful comments dotted around head-fi, there doesn't seem to be a wealth of experience with or opinion on this DAC. None the less I was encouraged to read the words 'neutral' and 'detailed' in a number of the observations that do exist and decided to take the plunge. I'll be pairing it with the Little Dot MK IV SE - so there's an obvious synergy (if only cosmetic) and convenience here - and the HD 650. The only other external DAC I have any experience with is the uDac, so it'll be interesting to see how the two compare - though obviously given the price difference, I'm hoping the DAC_I will bring a lot more to the table.
I can assure you that it is a very detailed dac.
Is it possible to connect a DAC_I to my studio monitors using the RCA outs and to a MKVII using the balanced out, and being able to switch between the two?
I see that it's got two DIP8 opamps on swappable sockets...but what are they? LM4562NA?
Yes,both outputs are active,you can feed them to whatever you want.

Hi, could you elaborate some more? :) I'm choosing between this 2 and would like to hear more of your views. The terms "clean, open, thin, detailed and cold" seem to contradict each other slightly - in my understanding we have 3 positives and 2 negatives ;) Maybe you could elaborate to give us a better understanding ....
I see you have the Dac_1 for sale so of course that says something ;)