Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › Bass MIA in Hd800's...may be a contentious post
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Bass MIA in Hd800's...may be a contentious post

post #1 of 40
Thread Starter 
Hiya , first let me qualify myself ..I'm no stranger to headphones or high end systems and don't have a hearing problem barring some loss above 15khz.
Prior to getting my 800's I have used the H600's and the HD650s running thru a variety of headphone amps , X-cansV2, V3 , Graham slee solo , Custom SET amp , and a custom class A discrete component solid state amp and have enjoyed sound from all of them with some good sources , Jolida CDP , Theta transport and DAC etc and lately my Slim devices Transporter.
At any rate , I got Woo WA2 and was enjoying it and soon after decided to get the Hd800's...I had heard them extremely briefly (5 mins)with a Wa2 and was blown away by their imaging and openess of the sound
I had read comments and reviews on em ...and took note of the proviso that they were slightly bass shy ....hmm!
I ran the phones in for at least 100 hours and settled back for some serious listening....only to find that , to put it bluntly , these phones sound really treble hot and have no real drive , yes there is low bass but its limited , lower midbass seems extremely lacking.
To cut a long story short , after swapping amps , sources , cables , valves , dacs and so forth I determined my Class A SS state drove em with the best bass and the cleanest output ...I realise these phones measure flat - but they really started sounding fatuiging long term , giving me no real pleasure compared to my 600/650's which sounded grainy and veiled by comparison to the 800's in all other respects apart from bass.

Flat in any systems sounds like doo doo mostly - I have a TACT time and freq room correction system I have used in my main rig and doing time and freq EQ without overlaying a preference curve results in clean but horrible sound , TACT themselves provide preference curves to ameliorate the sound of perfectly flat.

I decided to insert my Z-sys RDP-1 digital parametric between my transporters digital output and it's DAC (I reviewed the unit here Z-Systems RDP-1 - Digital preamp ) and added some judicial eq in the Vlf and low bass and the Hd800's "woke up" and started sounding wonderful .. at any rate , I now use the 800's with a Behringer DEQ2496 using its PEQ function rather than the Z-sys which I use in one of my main systems...It's a $350 unit and sounds almost as good as the Z-sys. (google it)
I have a pal that also has the 800's and he too has been going mad trying to get these phones sounding good , he was blown away by the change the Parametric EQ makes - takes these phones into a different class.
I now have deep and tight and quite visceral bass and my music sounds like it should. No cable , dac , or amp change can possible do what these units can ...
Im wondering if the fact that these phones are so open (physically) and the drivers are not close to the ear and tilted away makes them lose some of the pressure wave the bass should provide and this is why they sound so bass shy?
post #2 of 40
Wish I would have tried that. I just gave up and returned the ETY's err.. I mean HD-800's. Though I am sure adding another component in the chain has some detrements as well.

Welcome to head fi
post #3 of 40
Welcome to Head-Fi.

Equalization does work wonders. I tried EQ-ing a STAX set up through my Mac, using Audio Hi Jack Pro, digital out to a DAC, and then to the STAX. Much much better body when you raise the lower frequencies. But then some purists, in the name of signal purity, will condemn you if you use EQ. I personally prefer to enjoy the music than to maintain a pure signal.

People does complain about the lack of Bass on the HD800.. try something like the Balancing Act amp, that might help.

post #4 of 40
I am more of a stat person myself, but I went to the trouble of listening to several HD800's at the LA Canjam. Many of the set-ups were quite bland, but the best I heard was the Headroom demo with the BUDA(?) balanced system. Nothing about that set-up seemed bass-shy. Mostly I was struck by how similar the sound was to the Stax 007/BHSE also on display.

That said, equalization is petty much taboo in high-end systems. I do equalize my main speaker system with an old dBx equalizer which has mike inputs to do this in a measured fashion.

For some years I used to equalize various stat headphones, generally just cutting the treble. You are right, completely flat is usually not the best sound. In a concert hall, treble will fall off with distance and flat treble is not going to sound good. Also most pop-rock have tweaked up treble and this is also going to sound bad on a truly flat system.
post #5 of 40
You said it yourself. You think flat response sounds terrible and prefer a colored, exaggerated bass.

If that is what you enjoy, great.

But I don't think you should fault equipment for not coloring the sound.

For one, I cannot stand the sound of exaggerated bass. It sounds unclean and ruins the tonal balance.

It's a matter of preference. I think my many experiences playing a few instruments and attending many live acoustic performances heavily influences my tastes. If most of my listening was to colored gear with exaggerated bass, I probably wouldn't be happy with the HD-800, either.

Whatever sound signature you've been conditioned to is what you judge equipment by. It's even been demonstrated recently that some prefer the sound of lossy MP3 tracks just because they're so used to them.
post #6 of 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Erik View Post
Whatever sound signature you've been conditioned to is what you judge equipment by. It's even been demonstrated recently that some prefer the sound of lossy MP3 tracks just because they're so used to them.
This is so true, I had to re-condition my self back to natural bass.

Getting to love the HD800’s was a bit like an awakening. From amongst a sea of coloured and over emphasised bass headphones the pollution has finally lifted and I’ve found my way again.
post #7 of 40
I just got the DEQ2496 after swearing I never would...

As for the HD800 bass, I wish there were just a bit more of it, but that's just a preference because I do think the 800 gets it about as right as can be. And I feel this more now after I sold my pair.
post #8 of 40
For my taste, the 800s can be just a touch clinical from even good digital sources. I find them just right with vinyl, where you can dial in little more bloom and bass bloat weight.
post #9 of 40
In the realm of studio monitors, at least in the day when full sized monitors were used, the preferred technique would have been to adjust them to flat response in the listening space; but not with EQ, with built in speaker controls. Padding or shelving. As these monitors came to be used in homes, the good advice was to pad them flat and give yourself a good length of exposure to get used to flat response. After that bad listening habits are gone and most of us preferred the flat response. It usually sounded pretty bad at first listen.

This is a lot easier with headphones because there are no room acoustics to deal with.

One thing that never changes - frequent experience with live music is essential to have a real reference. Comparing systems with other systems instead of live music is a disaster. You have no real world reference to compare to.

All that said, a lot of people love Grados for instance. Everyone knows they are colored but no law says you can not prefer their very entertaining sound. Nothing wrong with "better than real," if that is what you want.

Clark
post #10 of 40
Thread Starter 
It's rather patronising to assume I don't know what good bass is and that I don't go to live....
post #11 of 40
I think the HD800 does bass just right. Not too little and not too much. Sure, there are more bass heavy cans out there, but I feel the HD800 has the right amount.

Not anywhere as much as the DX1000, which I can't understand all the prase for their bass quality, but that's just me, many seem to love them. I think they sound weird and unproportional, at least out of the Zana.

With the HD800, the lows are there, but tight, accurate and not in the way. They seem to have opened up from being very stiff out of the box. Could be my ears, break-in, or a combination, but anyway they don't sound the same as they did when new, in a good way.
post #12 of 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by nor_spoon View Post
I think the HD800 does bass just right. Not too little and not too much. Sure, there are more bass heavy cans out there, but I feel the HD800 has the right amount.

Not anywhere as much as the DX1000, which I can't understand all the prase for their bass quality, but that's just me, many seem to love them. I think they sound weird and unproportional, at least out of the Zana.

With the HD800, the lows are there, but tight, accurate and not in the way. They seem to have opened up from being very stiff out of the box. Could be my ears, break-in, or a combination, but anyway they don't sound the same as they did when new, in a good way.
Most 'bass shy' headphones tend to get the bass just right. If you spend 1,400 shouldn't you want accurate bass over 'fun' bass, if you truly want to get close to the original recording as possible.. I know that's not every ones intent. & we have a preference, but to put it as a negative is funny, since the HD800 bass is most likely more accurate them most if not all current hi end headphones.. So being more accurate or faithful is seen as a negative by many audiophiles who want to get as close to the original recording as possible? Makes no sense..
post #13 of 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarkmc2 View Post
In the realm of studio monitors, at least in the day when full sized monitors were used, the preferred technique would have been to adjust them to flat response in the listening space; but not with EQ, with built in speaker controls. Padding or shelving. As these monitors came to be used in homes, the good advice was to pad them flat and give yourself a good length of exposure to get used to flat response. After that bad listening habits are gone and most of us preferred the flat response. It usually sounded pretty bad at first listen.

This is a lot easier with headphones because there are no room acoustics to deal with.

One thing that never changes - frequent experience with live music is essential to have a real reference. Comparing systems with other systems instead of live music is a disaster. You have no real world reference to compare to.

All that said, a lot of people love Grados for instance. Everyone knows they are colored but no law says you can not prefer their very entertaining sound. Nothing wrong with "better than real," if that is what you want.

Clark
True..
post #14 of 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodney_Gold View Post
It's rather patronising to assume I don't know what good bass is and that I don't go to live....
I am so very sorry that you took offense. I was speaking to the problem generally and historically. I thought I was clear about that, but my skills as a communicator must be diminishing with age. In any case I was not talking about you, but the problem you posed for us to comment on.

Clark
post #15 of 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rodney_Gold View Post
It's rather patronising to assume I don't know what good bass is and that I don't go to live....
Oh come on Rodney_Gold don’t be so sensitive, no one said you didn’t know what good bass is. I think the theme here is some people prefer good coloured bass, and there ain’t anything wrong with that.

By the way welcome to head fi, where a thick skin is very handy.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: High-end Audio Forum
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Summit-Fi (High-End Audio) › High-end Audio Forum › Bass MIA in Hd800's...may be a contentious post