Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Computer Audio › Foobar2000 vs iTunes
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Foobar2000 vs iTunes - Page 2

post #16 of 85
10/11/09 at 3:36am
In terms of UI, I have found Zune to be better than iTunes, in fact I hate the iTunes UI. However, I use Foobar for the ASIO output which was not supported in earlier versions of the Zune software.
Reply

Head-Fi's Best Sellers

post #17 of 85
10/11/09 at 4:27am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy*Carl View Post
How could iTunes on windows be significantly different in terms of sound quality than on OSX?
Different sound implementation on OS level.
Core Audio (Mac OS X) is bit-perfect, while DirectSound (MS Windows) do not seem to have the same advantage.
That may have changed with iTunes 9.0 though, which afaik support WASAPI on Windows Vista and 7, but was an issue in the past.
Reply
post #18 of 85
10/11/09 at 8:55am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy*Carl View Post
Also I tried getting file play count plug-in to work in foobar (one reason for me not using it), but it never worked.
What exactly didn't work? I'm using foo_playcount and it works just fine for me.
Reply
post #19 of 85
10/11/09 at 10:16am
The sole reason I use Foobar is that it is very low on resources. And oh, one small fact about iTunes: it is Apple software.
Reply
post #20 of 85
10/11/09 at 10:33am
I'd personally like to use non-iTunes and organize all my music via playlists as i used to in past but since i got an iPod Touch.. Used to use Winamp in fact . Haven't spent any time with foo

Found Multi-Plugin a while ago but was saddened it wasn't being updated further to accomodate new versions of iTunes
Reply
post #21 of 85
10/11/09 at 10:45am
Quote:
Originally Posted by apatN View Post
The sole reason I use Foobar is that it is very low on resources. And oh, one small fact about iTunes: it is Apple software.
They are pretty lucky, Peter hasnt released a MAC version,
or maybe you cant beat Apple on its territory
Reply
post #22 of 85
10/11/09 at 10:46am
Quote:
Originally Posted by apatN View Post
The sole reason I use Foobar is that it is very low on resources. And oh, one small fact about iTunes: it is Apple software.
Wehay, let's get some Apple bashing on the go!...

I'm just trying out Foobar on my PC, Flac Support is a really nice feature there's no doubt about that. However, if itunes supported FLAC there would be no contest for me.

I am going to continue to use Foobar for a while until I can form a proper opinion, but aside from the delightfully small footprint of it [not such a big deal when you have a decent computer to be quite honest] and FLAC compatibility, I can't see any other reason to keep using it.

Apple's offering has far better visualizations, a much nicer UI [both quite important things to me]

The only pull is that FLAC, as for which one I will use, it depends on how much of a difference I heard when I get my AMP3 tomorrow. If the difference between 320K VBR and FLAC is not audible on it, then Foobar is getting binned...

If only iTunes supported FLAC.....
Reply
post #23 of 85
10/11/09 at 11:56am
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loque View Post
Wehay, let's get some Apple bashing on the go!...

I'm just trying out Foobar on my PC, Flac Support is a really nice feature there's no doubt about that. However, if itunes supported FLAC there would be no contest for me.

I am going to continue to use Foobar for a while until I can form a proper opinion, but aside from the delightfully small footprint of it [not such a big deal when you have a decent computer to be quite honest] and FLAC compatibility, I can't see any other reason to keep using it.

Apple's offering has far better visualizations, a much nicer UI [both quite important things to me]

The only pull is that FLAC, as for which one I will use, it depends on how much of a difference I heard when I get my AMP3 tomorrow. If the difference between 320K VBR and FLAC is not audible on it, then Foobar is getting binned...

If only iTunes supported FLAC.....
Just convert flac - wav, import to itunes and convert to alac.
Reply
post #24 of 85
10/11/09 at 1:01pm
If my iTouch wouldn't require iTunes to manage it, I would never install that piece of crap software on my computer (yeah I know there are alternatives, just not as good when it comes to managing the iTouch). Win XP + iTunes = A nightmare. For some reason iTunes works extremely slow on windows machines. It also crashes a lot. I used it last time on thursday to update music on my iPod. The program managed to crash twice in ~one hour.
Reply
post #25 of 85
10/11/09 at 1:03pm
foobar. Can itunes play or convert to flac & ogg? What about scanning files for replaygain? Nope. Allow plugins?
Reply
post #26 of 85
10/11/09 at 1:48pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by iriverdude View Post
foobar. Can itunes play or convert to flac & ogg? What about scanning files for replaygain? Nope. Allow plugins?
Flac can easily be converted to apple lossless.
Reply
post #27 of 85
10/11/09 at 1:58pm
Within itunes? Alac isn't as open as flac. My Squeezebox, iriver and PC's all suport flac and I can use several applications to play or convert to other formats.
Reply
post #28 of 85
10/11/09 at 2:30pm
^ Just the other way around as well.
FLAC is not supported on devices/applications which support ALAC. So to each their own...
Reply
post #29 of 85
10/11/09 at 4:05pm
I like fb2k because it's so modular.

It's easy to convert music to other formats, ABX tracks, tag files properly, apply ReplayGain, move/rename/organize your whole music collection however you want it, it has a simple 18-band EQ built in that can be very useful, allows me to set up global hotkeys the way I like it (e.g. hotkeys to rate current track while surfing the web, fb sits in the tray most of the time anway), has amazing DSP plugins I couldn't live without, supports dynamic playlists based on my custom expressions (e.g. rating 3+, or tracks not play within x days or certain genres ..), allows me to sort and group music the way I want it, and so on and on ..

And all of that fits into a nice and simple 3mb installer which installs fb only, no fancy updater or other stuff.
Reply
post #30 of 85
10/11/09 at 4:26pm
Thread Starter 
Another thing I cant figure how to do in foobar is have it automatically sort my music like it does in i tunes. All i do is drag and drop the file into Itunes, and it automatically copies, renames it, stores it in the appropriate artist folder and album folder. Then I delete the original file.
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Computer Audio

Head-Fi's Best Sellers

Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Computer Audio › Foobar2000 vs iTunes