Do you guys really think the monster BJC thing is real? Looks like a pretty funny april fool's day joke.
well anyway if its real, I hope monster fired that lawyer, what a dumb pos.
I also saw the vid, and the recent responses mare sort of indicative with a lot of the issues currently plaguing science and the whole cable issues. If you really believe in everything that science tells you, then cryogenic treatment actually does matter, high end digital cables really do matter. But even as someone who claims that they hear differences in cables, I've never heard a differences in high end digital cables. BUT Science tells us that there are difference. And as for cryogenic treatments, all you have to do is look at certain precious metals and stones. They vary in terms of quality, but what you have to realize is that they're quality depends on their "purity" in crystalline structures, in other words the fewer imperfections, the better. The crystaline structure in metal(wire) is the same. Cryogenic treatments lead to bigger crystals and fewer imperfections that cause noise. Science TELLS you that there are differences in what you should hear.
But the rub is, people ignore that part of science, and then go and cite the "part of science" like DBT's and other previous tests that head-fiers still say are scientific. And my issue with that is, they're half telling the truth. Now to the guy in the video's credit, the other side does the same thing, they also ignore certain parts of science to support their issue and omit some parts. Moral of the story -both sides aren't using science, or at least they are abusing to such an extent that we use phrases like "Cable believer" or "non-cable believer" to indicate that we are no longer speaking about scientific matters but rather matters of faith.. ah crap I'm treading over the rules... I'll stop now