Quote:
Originally Posted by immtbiker 
No, i personally would not compare them as being neutral at all. They give a neutral sound reproduction, but they are lively and aggressive.
My best comparison is using the Jades to Omega II MK2 comparison.
Another comparison that I would use, is the K701's compared to the HD800's.
The 701's and the Omegas and the LCD's have gobs of detail but are extremely laid back. The Jades and the HE-5's and the 800's have gobs of detail and head stage, but they are more aggressive and lively.
I would say that 60% the headphone world is going to prefer the HE-5's and 40% is going to prefer the LCD-2's.
I personally don't like a laidback headphone. That's me. I like one that brings a keg to the party. If you want to sip on a glass of Chardonnay and listen to music, the Omegas, the 701's and the LCD-2's would probably fit more of your preferences.
|
I like your comparison, but I will add that the HE-5 are still more laid back than the HD800 or even the Jade, and the HE-5 are the warmest of the three (Jade second and HD800 third). They have that sense of warmth that the O2 also give, which the K701 and HD800 don't offer as much unless you get exactly the right amp for them.
Next, didn't you think the O2 got more aggressive and lively off the WES and A-10 amps when compared to the GES?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrainFood 
My only real reservation is their weight. I like to 'move' a bit when I listen (often to dance music) and I'm concerned that they'll feel a bit cumbersome. The 30-day refund option is great but with UK import duty/tax of around 25% and then return ship, it might end up a very expensive audition.
|
The weight does make them a poorer choice for the dancing and thrashing crowd. They have momentum and shift position a bit with big movements.