Head-Fi.org › Forums › Head-Fi Special Forums › Premier Sponsor Forums and Sponsor Forums › Sponsor Forums › CryoParts › Sonicweld Diverter: comments about the design, from the designer
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Sonicweld Diverter: comments about the design, from the designer - Page 3  

post #31 of 37
2/8/11 at 8:41pm

Making such an expensive piece of gear and terminating it with RCA is insanity in my book (ie: Buying expensive gear for its better performance then deliberately choosing features which induce distortion).

post #32 of 37
2/8/11 at 8:43pm

So far you've been off twice in this thread in what you've been reading, Currawong.

 

Who ever said RCA?  I asked if it would be made with an AES/EBU output.

post #33 of 37
2/8/11 at 8:48pm

Yes, the Diverter has a bnc termination.

post #34 of 37
2/8/11 at 11:09pm

iPodPJ: XLR plugs aren't 110 Ohm either. tongue_smile.gif

post #35 of 37
2/9/11 at 2:09am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Currawong View Post

iPodPJ: XLR plugs aren't 110 Ohm either. tongue_smile.gif


That still has no bearing on the question. wink.gif  With my gear I prefer using AES.

post #36 of 37
2/9/11 at 11:13am
Quote:
Originally Posted by dallan View Post

Yes, the Diverter has a bnc termination.



Correct, thanks Dallan!

 

Lee

post #37 of 37
2/9/11 at 11:15am


I agree.  I wish all coax digital gear was supplied with BNC connectors, but, alas, the RCA is ubiquitous.

 

Peace, 

 

Lee

 


Quote:
Originally Posted by Currawong View Post

Making such an expensive piece of gear and terminating it with RCA is insanity in my book 

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: CryoParts
This thread is locked  
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Head-Fi Special Forums › Premier Sponsor Forums and Sponsor Forums › Sponsor Forums › CryoParts › Sonicweld Diverter: comments about the design, from the designer