Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Music › Kid A - Why does everyone love it so much?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Kid A - Why does everyone love it so much? - Page 3

post #31 of 116
Well put as always, Sherwood. Mainstream is too often used as a Genre, which it is not. When quality music (and this is up to you, I don't pretend to know what makes music quality to others) gets in the mainstream it is usually because it is given a decent spotlight which allows for repeated listens. It is a known fact that the human brain appreciates music it has heard before which is why most musicals have an overture. And sadly most great music rarely gets a repeated listen by the general public.

This theory holds true to Kid A. I first listened to it as a die hard Radiohead fan but was not taken by it immediately. It was so foreign. But I was a fan, so I did not give up. Now I find it as catchy as anything the Beatles have put out. And that is why IMO it is classic. It took something new, odd and foreign and made it familiar- even catchy.

There are plenty of other 'Kid A's' out there, that could be held in the same regard. Unfort. they did not have the notoriety of Radiohead, so they will not have the built in audience to be on any mainstream lists.

If you still struggle with Kid A, and have not listened to it in full more than a handfull of times, I would suggest you do so. Some of my favorite albums have taken quite a while to get used to. The ones that I like immediately usually fade into my collection rather quickly.

If it is still not for you after a dozen listens, well that is why music is an art and not a science. There are plenty of classic albums I do not get, and have certainly tried.
post #32 of 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sherwood View Post
This feels very snobbish to me, which is not what I was going for. What is it about unknown music that makes it better? Allison Krauss enjoyed a great deal of popularity in the last decade, but Del McCoury hasn't. Is that a mark against Allison Krauss? I don't think many Bluegrass fans would argue that, and I wouldn't either.

Why all the hate for popular music, friends?
I know, and although I can tend to be quite snobbish about music my remark was at least half in jest. I do consider Coldplay to be little more than muzak, but I do not consider what's 'mainstream' to automatically be of less value than what is not.

Some of my best friends live in the mainstream

The term 'mainstream' means to me roughly the same as what Pop meant before it became a genre of it's own. It's quite simply Popular music, and it has become popular music usually because it is more easily accessible. That's the second hint of mainstream: Accessibility.

And as You mentioned, what is considered mainstream is heavily dependent on the environment (era, age group, social group…). One could argue that Arvo Pärt and Coltrane, both who's music I enjoy greatly, are both in the 'mainstream', you just have to find the right forum.
post #33 of 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pangaea View Post
If it is still not for you after a dozen listens, well that is why music is an art and not a science. There are plenty of classic albums I do not get, and have certainly tried.
Often, these are the albums I come to really cherish in later years. I bought "Dark Side of the Moon" and "Kind of Blue" on the same trip to the record store when I was 12. Listened to them, didn't get them, put them away for years. One can assume how I feel about them both now.
post #34 of 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pangaea View Post
There are plenty of other 'Kid A's' out there, that could be held in the same regard. Unfort. they did not have the notoriety of Radiohead, so they will not have the built in audience to be on any mainstream lists.
Yeah that's true. I don't know how many great bands have been signed to a major label because they seemed to fit some basic concept of some currently popular genre to only be dumped when they didn't catch on with the mainstream right away. I was just recently reading about some fairly popular underground garage rock band that went through that early this decade when garage rock was all the rage. Its a shame really.

Quote:
If you still struggle with Kid A, and have not listened to it in full more than a handfull of times, I would suggest you do so. Some of my favorite albums have taken quite a while to get used to. The ones that I like immediately usually fade into my collection rather quickly.
I used to go through that faze of having to listen to certain albums a dozen times to really appreciate it. I believe I've personally outgrown that now. I know when something strikes my fancy immediately now. My taste in music is pretty diverse, but then again with a whole forum of music lovers its probably not as diverse as I have myself fooled into believing.

Quote:
If it is still not for you after a dozen listens, well that is why music is an art and not a science. There are plenty of classic albums I do not get, and have certainly tried.
You're probably on to something there. Not sure if this was aimed at me or not. I don't hate the album. As I said before, I appreciate it for what it is. Not in the top of my playlist though, probably not really in the middle either.
post #35 of 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by limpidglitch View Post
The term 'mainstream' means to me roughly the same as what Pop meant before it became a genre of it's own. It's quite simply Popular music, and it has become popular music usually because it is more easily accessible. That's the second hint of mainstream: Accessibility.
Yep.

Quote:
I do not consider what's 'mainstream' to automatically be of less value than what is not.
And Yep.
post #36 of 116
Thread Starter 
I feel that there is Mainstream, Underground Mainstream, and Under Underground.

Also, in regards to Kid A, along the same line as adrift's last comment, I was a fan of it when it was released, and I still am. I think what intrigues me the most about it is its' seeming popularity revival in the Underground Mainstream. Perhaps, though, that is because this decade is coming to a close and a lot of the lesser efforts have been weeded out and forgotten.

For recent years, yes, I would say it holds up well. But it, in my opinion, is nowhere near a "classic" or "masterpiece" outside of the context of the past five or ten years.
post #37 of 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by limpidglitch View Post
That's the second hint of mainstream: Accessibility.
Good point. That really needs to be added to any definition of "mainstream" we attempt to dream up, here.
post #38 of 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by adrift View Post
I gauge most mainstream as pretty much anything a bunch of college frat kids would party to.
Interesting…I'm not gonna say this is inaccurate nowadays, but that was absolutely not true during my college days. If this is currently the case, however, it may explain alot about not just Radiohead's popularity, but also about how un-ambitious the university populace has become. (I choose to blame it on the crushing debt from student loans.) The epitome of college-rock-that-eventually-went-kinda-mainstream when I was in school was Talking Heads, R.E.M. and the B-52s. I would've thought college folk were more into stuff like Animal Collective—which I'm not really sold on, but…

Quote:
Originally Posted by adrift View Post
Or as T-Bone Burnett put it:

"We live in an age of music for people who don't like music. The record industry discovered some time ago that there aren't that many people who actually like music. For a lot of people, music's annoying, or at the very least they don't need it. They discovered if they could sell music to a lot of those people, they could sell a lot more records."
I love T-Bone. Saw him open for Elvis Costello a zillion years ago. However, I must say that this is hilarious coming from the guy who produced that "Album of the Year" for Alison Krauss and Robert Plant.
post #39 of 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by adrift View Post
Yeah that's true. I don't know how many great bands have been signed to a major label because they seemed to fit some basic concept of some currently popular genre to only be dumped when they didn't catch on with the mainstream right away. I was just recently reading about some fairly popular underground garage rock band that went through that early this decade when garage rock was all the rage. Its a shame really.



I used to go through that faze of having to listen to certain albums a dozen times to really appreciate it. I believe I've personally outgrown that now. I know when something strikes my fancy immediately now. My taste in music is pretty diverse, but then again with a whole forum of music lovers its probably not as diverse as I have myself fooled into believing.



You're probably on to something there. Not sure if this was aimed at me or not. I don't hate the album. As I said before, I appreciate it for what it is. Not in the top of my playlist though, probably not really in the middle either.
Not aimed at anyone, in fact to be honest I have not read thru this entire thread. I just wanted to put some input on Kid A. It is a difficult album and I can understand why people have trouble with it. As long as people are not disrespectful of what I like, and are genuine music fans- I appreciate their input.
post #40 of 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by chud View Post
I feel that there is Mainstream, Underground Mainstream, and Under Underground.

Also, in regards to Kid A, along the same line as adrift's last comment, I was a fan of it when it was released, and I still am. I think what intrigues me the most about it is its' seeming popularity revival in the Underground Mainstream. Perhaps, though, that is because this decade is coming to a close and a lot of the lesser efforts have been weeded out and forgotten.

For recent years, yes, I would say it holds up well. But it, in my opinion, is nowhere near a "classic" or "masterpiece" outside of the context of the past five or ten years.
Have we had any masterpieces in the last past five or ten years? I'm not sure we have. The 90s had Smells Like Teen Spirit, and while not exactly a masterpiece by my standards it does mark some sort of milestone and shift in popular music. Has there been any radical culture shifting albums in popular music since then? I'm not sure Kid A qualifies, but I could be wrong. I think White Stripes Elephant sort of introduced the garage rock sound back into the mainstream, and indie folk bands like Sufjan Stevens or Fleet Foxes maybe reintroduced that sound back into the collective conscious. Possibly Franz Ferdinand brought post-punk back... Maybe, as limpidglitch put it, Kid A made way for wave of lush atmospheric electro-tinged alternative music made more famous by bands like Coldplay.

Not sure.
post #41 of 116
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sherwood View Post
Good point. That really needs to be added to any definition of "mainstream" we attempt to dream up, here.
Define accessibility then, because is it not to be argued that in this electronic day and age, even the most obscure of music is "accessible?"

Hear a song you like? Bam, download it.

Like a particular band? Bam, Pandora will recommend 10 more bands of similar sound.

You're a fan of XYZ and you have them on your MySpace page? Bam, check out their friends because odds are they are friends with similar sounding bands.

Etc etc etc.
post #42 of 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by tru blu View Post
Interesting…I'm not gonna say this is inaccurate nowadays, but that was absolutely not true during my college days. If this is currently the case, however, it may explain alot about not just Radiohead's popularity, but also about how un-ambitious the university populace has become. (I choose to blame it on the crushing debt from student loans.) The epitome of college-rock-that-eventually-went-kinda-mainstream when I was in school was Talking Heads, R.E.M. and the B-52s. I would've thought college folk were more into stuff like Animal Collective—which I'm not really sold on, but…
I know I know. And you're right. Just a guess here, but I think it all started in the early 90s. lol

Quote:
I love T-Bone. Saw him open for Elvis Costello a zillion years ago. However, I must say that this is hilarious coming from the guy who produced that "Album of the Year" for Alison Krauss and Robert Plant.
Haha. yeah, well... I'm not sure pairing up those two is exactly a mainstream concept even if they are mainstream artists. And only T-Bone could probably have made it work.
post #43 of 116
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by adrift View Post
Have we had any masterpieces in the last past five or ten years? I'm not sure we have. The 90s had Smells Like Teen Spirit, and while not exactly a masterpiece by my standards it does mark some sort of milestone and shift in popular music. Has there been any radical culture shifting albums in popular music since then? I'm not sure Kid A qualifies, but I could be wrong. I think White Stripes Elephant sort of introduced the garage rock sound back into the mainstream, and indie folk bands like Sufjan Stevens or Fleet Foxes maybe reintroduced that sound back into the collective conscious. Possibly Franz Ferdinand brought post-punk back... Maybe, as limpidglitch put it, Kid A made way for wave of lush atmospheric electro-tinged alternative music made more famous by bands like Coldplay.

Not sure.
The only person/group who I can personally think of off the top of my head out of my collection whose ENTIRE body of work in recent years stands out would be Nine Inch Nails. That would be pushing the twenty year mark, but between the angry dirty industrial, to motion picture scores, to mellow trance, I think he is one of the few who has done a lot.

Besides that though, no, I can't think of any artist who has caused a huge stir of emotion or shift in music like the early grunge artists did.
post #44 of 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by chud View Post
The only person/group who I can personally think of off the top of my head out of my collection whose ENTIRE body of work in recent years stands out would be Nine Inch Nails. That would be pushing the twenty year mark, but between the angry dirty industrial, to motion picture scores, to mellow trance, I think he is one of the few who has done a lot.

Besides that though, no, I can't think of any artist who has caused a huge stir of emotion or shift in music like the early grunge artists did.
Yeah as far as introducing industrial to the mainstream I'd definitely agree, but as you noted that was uh... probably 15 years ago.

I'm curious what the next big thing is going to be.
post #45 of 116
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by adrift View Post

I'm curious what the next big thing is going to be.
Kid-B
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Music
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Misc.-Category Forums › Music › Kid A - Why does everyone love it so much?