Ahh that's true. 
Easier to just get a receiver with a sub out if you can though hehe.

Easier to just get a receiver with a sub out if you can though hehe.
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!

|
No it wouldn't actually.
You can run wires in parallel to the speaker and sub input simultaneously. As long as you can physically fit the two wires into the same speaker terminal. The input impedance of the sub would be high enough to do so without causing an increased load. |
|
Sorry, could you explain this to me, it's a little confusing. If you're wiring in parallel and say the impedance of the sub is 4ohms and the speakers are 8ohms, wouldn't you get a nominal impedance of 2.67ohms ((8x4)/(8+4))? If the sub uses a driver with an impedance of 2ohms, the nominal impedance would drop to 1.6ohms. Afaik many entry level amps aren't stable to that low of an impedance and begin to clip.
|
|
Sorry, could you explain this to me, it's a little confusing. If you're wiring in parallel and say the impedance of the sub is 4ohms and the speakers are 8ohms, wouldn't you get a nominal impedance of 2.67ohms ((8x4)/(8+4))? If the sub uses a driver with an impedance of 2ohms, the nominal impedance would drop to 1.6ohms. Afaik many entry level amps aren't stable to that low of an impedance and begin to clip.
|