Quote:
Originally Posted by Arainach 
And when that happens, it IS MIcrosoft's problem. Which is why they put so much work into making sure things do work…I could go on for a loooooong time with those. Suffice to say that MS puts a huge amount of work into backwards compatibility, which is why an overwhelming majority of stuff going all the way back to Windows 3.1 still runs on modern systems without even recompiling. For the tiny number of Mac programs out there (comparatively), for Apple not to provide backcompat is apalling.
|
And yet there are still compatibility issues. Why else is Microsoft building XP virtualization into Windows 7?
It's not like Apple is ignoring backward compatibility either; when OS X came out, it was a radical departure from OS 9, so Apple did something similar to what Microsoft is doing now: allowed you to run OS 9 and its apps under OS X. Apple's also radically changed system architecture, going from the G5 to Intel CPUs. Thanks to Rosetta, you could still run your old PPC apps -- even PPC apps written for OS 9.
OS 9 support was finally dropped in 10.5, but Rosetta still remains.
So you're appalled that they haven't gotten it 100% perfect? I guess the upgrade to Vista went perfectly then, and no one found they couldn't run some of their older software…
For what it's worth, the upgrade's been smooth for me, without a round of "Let's upgrade everything to compatible versions!"