i think im gonna get these when it's available... see how it compares to the re0
post #31 of 119
8/26/09 at 5:39pm
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!

|
By the same token, I've never heard Etys described as "fun earphones..."
|

|
I only mentioned "fun" because the OP wants a fun phone and the review liked the Ety HF5 more, so...
|
|
there is quite a goodly bit of bass with the w1. my side-by-side with the um1 revealed more similarities than differences, but the w1 is a little more energetic. fit is nearly the same as the bodies are very similar, but similar to jeremy at ilounge, i found the w1 to not be as easy to situate for a good seal.
but, i think i agree with much of what jeremy and larry said. the w1 is a great sounding earphone, but i don't think he was looking for what seems to be derogatorily described as a 'fun' earphone. rather, he described it when compared to the hf5 is less clear. while he didn't go deep into the sound, his obvious focus is on build, fit and overall sound balance. i think that both larry and jeremy have done good 'reviews', but focused on different aspects. for those looking for a crisper listen, there are better options for the price, but not for build. the w1 smashes the hf5 (i have used it even less than the w1) for build quality. also, jeremy notes that the cable is the same. rather, i think it has been upgraded with a slightly stiffer, more tightly-wound design which is sturdy. the narrow jack is a great addition for people who want to use it on daps and amps with recessed jacks and from behind cases. i will spend a little more time with one today. |
|
Only in as much as I'm looking for something that is involving and not overly-analytical or sterile/boring. Something that lets you really enjoy the music and makes you tap your foot emphatically at times without even realizing it!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like a lot of the benefits of the more upper-end phones may be lost when listening to more popular music like I do (alternative/pop/electronica) - particularly when used with something like an iPod/iPhone. I may be way off here, but I always figured the extra clarity/detail of the higher end phones were most appreciated by those with: - Very detailed, well-mastered & complex music collections - not the more "popular" stuff. - Very trained ears and a lot of experience in critical listening. - Quiet environments where they spend the time to really focus on the music. I've assumed that the benefits of spending 2-3x the price of something like the W1 would be largely lost on "the rest of us" who don't fit into the categories described above. Yes, there may be subtle improvements, but they would be largely wasted due to the style of music or being used with a portable playback device and AAC (256 kbps) files. Again, this is ONLY an assumption and may be totally incorrect. Agree or disagree? I'm just trying to understand how much benefit I would even get by stepping up to the UM3x for example. I realize no one can tell me that for sure, but I'm just trying to make as smart of a decision as possible. |

|
According to the iLounge review, they slot the UM1 and W1 as 'bassier' earphones. Is that only in relation to Etymotic earphones, or also to others (Phonak, UE, etc.)?
Also, copypasta: Anyways, how would you rate bass impact? Will it tickle your ear drums when they need to? I found my SF3s to be pretty light until I hooked up my E5 and foams. |
|
Only in as much as I'm looking for something that is involving and not overly-analytical or sterile/boring. Something that lets you really enjoy the music and makes you tap your foot emphatically at times without even realizing it!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like a lot of the benefits of the more upper-end phones may be lost when listening to more popular music like I do (alternative/pop/electronica) - particularly when used with something like an iPod/iPhone. I may be way off here, but I always figured the extra clarity/detail of the higher end phones were most appreciated by those with: - Very detailed, well-mastered & complex music collections - not the more "popular" stuff. - Very trained ears and a lot of experience in critical listening. - Quiet environments where they spend the time to really focus on the music. I've assumed that the benefits of spending 2-3x the price of something like the W1 would be largely lost on "the rest of us" who don't fit into the categories described above. Yes, there may be subtle improvements, but they would be largely wasted due to the style of music or being used with a portable playback device and AAC (256 kbps) files. Again, this is ONLY an assumption and may be totally incorrect. Agree or disagree? I'm just trying to understand how much benefit I would even get by stepping up to the UM3x for example. I realize no one can tell me that for sure, but I'm just trying to make as smart of a decision as possible. |


