You knew this was coming, didn't you? 
I'm going to post a couple of fast impressions of some tubes, and fill in gaps as time goes by. I'm hoping that others will also report tube-rolling experiments, so we can build a database of what tubes work best with Mikhail's amps.
I also want to point out that tube construction changed over time. If you don't have NOS tubes with dates on the box, it becomes important to look at the tubes really hard. Find matching date codes if you can. There are some small differences in construction from year to year that do affect the sound of the tube. If you've got a mismatched set, the sound won't be as coherent as it should. IMO it's more important that the tubes be the same construction than that they be matched electrically. IME the Supra sounds better with slightly mismatched tubes that are identical than with electrically matched tubes that may be from different years.
OK, I'll start with the standard. Sylvania VT-231, 1940's production. Also known as Sylvania 6SN7GT, or JAN-CHS-6SN7GT. If they were made at the same time, they're all the same tube, regardless of label. And they all sound good. However, there was a change in contruction around 1953 or so, and tubes made before that are considered more desireable. If this is the only tube you've heard in one of Mikhail's amps, it may be all that you will ever need. A good set has the complete package. Good high end extension, a warm and full midrange and decent bass extension. Imaging is precise and the perceived staging is wide. What could be better?
JAN-CKR-6SN7GT aka Ken-Rad VT-231. Clear or dark glass doesn't matter, but it must be the staggered plate version. Here's where it gets weird. I didn't like this tube early on. I thought it had a hard area in the midrange that gave the Sylvania a clear edge. I was wrong, I think. I've now tried two sets in the past week, and there's no trace of the hardness I heard before. My suspicion is that the amp had not fully burned in when I tried them, and that what I was hearing wasn't the tubes, but the amp itself. It's also possible that it was a cabling or source issue, since there have been a lot of system changes since the early tuberolling attempts. Right now, these tubes are heaven. Extended highs, a crystal clear midrange lacking some of the Sylvania's warmth, and an extended bass response. Interesting, actually, since these were also the tubes I eventually settled on with the MicroZOTL when I had one. They've got something that eventually brings me back to them. The level of detail seems higher than it is with Sylvania's, and the bass impact of these tubes really comes through on the R10.
So, at least for these two tubes, I'd go with the Sylvania if midrange warmth is critical, and with the Ken-Rads for a more balanced presentation. I'm a big fan of balance, and right now the Ken-Rads seem to be hitting the spot. But I'd always have a set of the Sylvania's nearby...
more to come...

I'm going to post a couple of fast impressions of some tubes, and fill in gaps as time goes by. I'm hoping that others will also report tube-rolling experiments, so we can build a database of what tubes work best with Mikhail's amps.
I also want to point out that tube construction changed over time. If you don't have NOS tubes with dates on the box, it becomes important to look at the tubes really hard. Find matching date codes if you can. There are some small differences in construction from year to year that do affect the sound of the tube. If you've got a mismatched set, the sound won't be as coherent as it should. IMO it's more important that the tubes be the same construction than that they be matched electrically. IME the Supra sounds better with slightly mismatched tubes that are identical than with electrically matched tubes that may be from different years.
OK, I'll start with the standard. Sylvania VT-231, 1940's production. Also known as Sylvania 6SN7GT, or JAN-CHS-6SN7GT. If they were made at the same time, they're all the same tube, regardless of label. And they all sound good. However, there was a change in contruction around 1953 or so, and tubes made before that are considered more desireable. If this is the only tube you've heard in one of Mikhail's amps, it may be all that you will ever need. A good set has the complete package. Good high end extension, a warm and full midrange and decent bass extension. Imaging is precise and the perceived staging is wide. What could be better?
JAN-CKR-6SN7GT aka Ken-Rad VT-231. Clear or dark glass doesn't matter, but it must be the staggered plate version. Here's where it gets weird. I didn't like this tube early on. I thought it had a hard area in the midrange that gave the Sylvania a clear edge. I was wrong, I think. I've now tried two sets in the past week, and there's no trace of the hardness I heard before. My suspicion is that the amp had not fully burned in when I tried them, and that what I was hearing wasn't the tubes, but the amp itself. It's also possible that it was a cabling or source issue, since there have been a lot of system changes since the early tuberolling attempts. Right now, these tubes are heaven. Extended highs, a crystal clear midrange lacking some of the Sylvania's warmth, and an extended bass response. Interesting, actually, since these were also the tubes I eventually settled on with the MicroZOTL when I had one. They've got something that eventually brings me back to them. The level of detail seems higher than it is with Sylvania's, and the bass impact of these tubes really comes through on the R10.
So, at least for these two tubes, I'd go with the Sylvania if midrange warmth is critical, and with the Ken-Rads for a more balanced presentation. I'm a big fan of balance, and right now the Ken-Rads seem to be hitting the spot. But I'd always have a set of the Sylvania's nearby...

more to come...











try it in the driver position. It sounds fantastic with the VT-231's. I haven't tried my Ken-Rads yet, I guess I'm gonna have to find 'em...





