I'm not sure which is the most worrying: The lack of tubes, that you dreamed of something to do with me or that you dreamed that I bought a blue BHSE. 
I'm not sure which is the most worrying: The lack of tubes, that you dreamed of something to do with me or that you dreamed that I bought a blue BHSE. 

Both the DACT or RK50 are used in the Justin’s BHSE, both are vastly superior to the ALPS RK27 used in the Violectric V200.
All linear pots and stepped attenuators have increased resistance at lower the volumes and has nothing to do with SS or tube topologies.
I’m not surprised a DACs volume control would do a better job than the ALPS RK27 it really is a cheap pot and sounds like it.
There is no doubt that a digital sound level setting, carried out from the DAC, is better than an analog setting from the amp -i.e., a potentiometer with its resistive tracks/wiper and all the associated circuitry and connections. And I'm talking about a good quality pot, in perfect condition. With my K-01/SRM007-tII/SR009 combo, I get a better sound quality by setting the amp pot to "full volume" and using a -17 to -20 dB attenuation from the DAC; this is a way to partially bypass the amp pot. The best solution would be to totally bypass the volume control circuitry on the amp, with direct inputs like some power amps (for speakers) have. But maybe the top-end pot of the BHSE (I should get mine soon) brings no perceptible SQ degradation... Any opinion about this, David1961? did you try pot/digital attenuator combinations with your BHSE/K-01 combo?
"I find tube rolling with the BHSE to be very difficult. I think the only real way your can get an accurate feeling for what the differences are is to have two BHSE going at the same time"
Either this says it is too close to call, so stop worrying...or you need a pair of matched BHSEs, with matched tubes. Colour code those BHSEs, the cooler (sound) with a blue front plate, the silver plate for the one with harder sound.

There is no doubt that a digital sound level setting, carried out from the DAC, is better than an analog setting from the amp -i.e., a potentiometer with its resistive tracks/wiper and all the associated circuitry and connections. And I'm talking about a good quality pot, in perfect condition. With my K-01/SRM007-tII/SR009 combo, I get a better sound quality by setting the amp pot to "full volume" and using a -17 to -20 dB attenuation from the DAC; this is a way to partially bypass the amp pot. The best solution would be to totally bypass the volume control circuitry on the amp, with direct inputs like some power amps (for speakers) have. But maybe the top-end pot of the BHSE (I should get mine soon) brings no perceptible SQ degradation... Any opinion about this, David1961? did you try pot/digital attenuator combinations with your BHSE/K-01 combo?
Thanks for your comments -- the best explanation I've heard on this to date . . .
The RK27 used in all the Stax amps and most high end equipment is not a high end pot by any means. It's better than the <1$ stuff out there but it has serious issues compared to the better attenuators.
Justin, you wrote a while ago that after the batch you are currently working on the BHSE will only come with two pro Stax jacks. Do people who are on the list now for the coming batch need to contact you if they want two pro stax jacks, or will you contact each of us when the time comes to deal with these issues? And what about color? Do you build the BHSE in a certain color unless otherwise specified?
Thank you.

HeadAmp Audio Electronics - home of the Pico and Gilmore amps. Now offering Audeze, HiFiMAN, and STAX headphones.
Find us at www.HeadAmp.com

On January 11, he posted 4 months. Do the math...
HeadAmp Audio Electronics - home of the Pico and Gilmore amps. Now offering Audeze, HiFiMAN, and STAX headphones.
Find us at www.HeadAmp.com
Hmmm, yes, this sounds like a very serious problem.

Absolutely, this all sounds very important.
Is anyone using cooling fans on the BHSE? I'm curious if they might be helpful and where they would be placed in relation to the amp . . .