Quote:
Originally Posted by boomy3555 
Just arrived today and burn in is progress. Not as powerful (actual volume) as the EF-1. At this time it is connected to my netbook via USB and the computer instantly recognized it with no problems. The headphone plug seems quite sturdy and the step volume is very smooth without any inbalance drop off in low volume as was an issue with the EF-1. I really appreciate the controls all "Up Front".
I would not attempt to evaluate the SQ pre-burn in so we'll have to wait and see, but even without an improvement post burn in, this little buddie is well worth the price.
It came extremely well packaged and quickly via EMS/USPS. I was surprised to find the tubes shipped installed in the unit. I don't know if there would be a downside to shipping with the tubes installed.... Just different...
|
The Amp without much burn-in sounds nicer than the DAC without burn-in - the DAC itself only needed 24-48 hours to open up in clarity and detail, and I did 250 on the amp with most of the improvement in the first 100-150). With burn-in the amp becomes less bright and the bass fills in nicely, while the DAC burn-in improves clarity and detail of the DAC section. My EF2 had about 24 hours on it when I took it home from CanJam.
Also, the internal DAC output level is lower than some other DACs with a "hot" output like Pico DAC only or Apogee mini-DAC, and is closer to the lower levels of the D10 line-out. So it wont play quite as loud using the internal DAC as it does with the Pico DAC-only or Apogee mini-DAC. But typically that only affects the position on the volume knob needed to achieve the same volume levels.
With most phones the power level is just a little below the EF1, but with those new HiFiMan prototype RE5 orthodynamic phones the EF1 was much better at driving their low 4-8 ohm impedance load. With Grado and Denon the volumes can be quite loud, and still fairly loud even with 300 ohm HD600 and HD800. It beats most portable amps for power, excluding maybe the 3MOVE or SR-71.