my experience w? hrt music streamer
I've had the basic ($89 )HRT Music Streamer for two months. I bought it because I was trying to lower the power consumption of my music server PC and the Stereophile recommendation gave me the impression that I wouldn't loose any of the fidelity of my current setup. My Vista PC has spdif output to my outboard DAC (an Entec 502.1 number cruncher). The Entech DAC consumes about 7-9 watts, I estimated that HRT USB DAC would use less than 2 Watts.
I was not that impressed initially. The HRT seemed somewhat distorted at first. I let it burn in (so I thought) for a week or so, and it still seemed distorted/congested. So I took it out of the system and went back to the Entech. About two weeks ago I returned the HRT into my system and thought the sound had improved quite a bit. I used the HRT again for about week. The sound had definitely improved. For the last week, I am back to using the Entech. The HRT is still not as good as the Entech but may get there with more burn-in(perhaps the Stereophile auditioned Streamer was well burned in before listened to by the reviewer).
The HRT Music Streamer may be better sounding than the on board analog outputs from my PC, But not quite as good as my current PC's spdif output to outboard DAC.
A Caveat, My Pre-Amp is a passive 24 step 100k ladder type(I estimate that it uses Zero Watts). There may be some kind of impedance issue that I am not aware of. Also the output from the HRT is all or nothing, the volume controls of the host PC will not adjust the volume of the HRT's output. No PC remote volume control with the HRT. DwayneB