About equally good but different. SR71-B is probably the better amp but C4 clearly has a better dac than the iPod and plays hires. Since C4 does not have a line out I can't try C4 as a source feeding SR71-B
Featured Stories
Topics Discussed
- brandAUDIOLOGY
- categoryCustom In Ear Monitors
- categoryIn Ear
- brandJH Audio
- itemJH Audio JH13 Pro Custom In Ear Monitors
- itemSpider Realvoice Vertical In The Ear Headphone
- itemUE 11 Pro
- brandUltimate Ears
- itemWestone ES3X
Related Forum Threads
- If you still love Etymotic ER4, this is the thread for you... Last post on 5/17/13 at 11:26pm in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Questions on Reshelling IEMs. Last post on 6/6/12 at 7:57am in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- REVIEW: Unique Melody Merlin - hybrid dynamic/balanced armature custom IEM Last post on 4/29/13 at 3:49am in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Cleared my inventory, ready for customs Last post on 7/28/11 at 7:05pm in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
- Ulitmate Ears and JH Audio $1,300 scam? Last post on 8/23/11 at 10:35pm in Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors
Related Articles
-
2012 Head-Fi Holiday Gift Guide (In-Ear)
Edited on 12/28/12
- Top Tier Universal Iem Comparison Chart And Information
Edited on 5/7/10- Basic Guide To In Ear Canalphones
Edited on 3/22/12Related Head Gear
Recent Reviews
-
I used this amp mainly with a pair of HD 650 and it does what it is supposed to do: it has way more power than I need, it's quiet and it makes everything sound in its place. I have never heard...
-
I bought these headphones just for the fun of it, to see how they sound with all that apparently amazing bass. Well, for $50, they're ok sounding for extra bass headphones. They do have a...
-
Bought it some time ago, based on user reviews. Straight out of the box it seemed huge, especially compared to my old Cowon D2. Also, sound was awful. Granted, I don't have large hi-fi cans, only...
-
Along with the summary below, I have posted a Youtube video review of the ATH-CKN70. If you like the video, check out my channel for more reviews :) Summary BUILD The...
-
Introduction I’m a basshead. I say that loudly and proudly, even though some folks believe basshead and audiophile are mutually exclusive. Obviously, I’m not in that camp. But sometimes, I...
JH Audio JH-13 PRO appreciation thread - Page 591
post #8851 of 91414/11/12 at 2:01amGear mentioned in this thread:
post #8852 of 91414/11/12 at 9:45am- purk
- Trader Feedback: +15
-
- offline
- 6,146 Posts. Joined 9/2001
- Location: Norcross, GA
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:Originally Posted by silverlight
Eric - thanks for the quick response. I'm not sure I'd characterize the SQ I'm hearing here as a difference in preference, but I could be wrong. I'm wondering if it's my ears... or the IEM's, don't know. My reference headphone gear is a electrostatic system (SR009, SR007mk1, HE90) and I have a couple dynamic setups (LiquidFire -> LCD3, etc.). On IEM's, my daily is a NuForce $70 headphone with iPhone mic (which is sounding more transparent than the JH13's on the upper mids and highs, which is why I think there must be an issue).
Well, I love my JH13pro as well and despite how great they can be they won't touch your reference system though. Still, they should walk all over your Nuforce $70 headphones in terms of transparency. I would call JHaudio and ask to see what's going on with the upper mids & high. For reference, I find the JH13pro treble to be more subdued next to my Shure SE535.post #8853 of 91414/11/12 at 10:18am- 3X0
- Trader Feedback: +6
-
- offline
- 3,237 Posts. Joined 9/2006
- Location: NYC
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:Originally Posted by dallan
Well finally caught up with the thread. Sounds like the sound science type guys are over here espousing that the cheapest is perfect and we can't trust our ears again.

I had a Sansa Fuze for a while, wanted to use it because it played my flac files. The sound was totally flat with the JH13s, anyone who use that is really missing out. I suspect the Sansa sound ie the Clip, which is lower end still, would carry that sound. What a waste of money spent on a pair of 13's. The 13's really show the source like HD800s, up the chain counts.
Well, the beauty of hi-fi upstream gear is that they're rated on their ability to make the signal sound artificially delicious. So to an extent, you are getting something for your money -- but again, this is much more efficiently achieved (in both performance and dollar terms) by means of software (or hardware) equalization.Of course the Clip+ isn't a holy grail and not reference in the grand scheme of things -- I should have specified that it is more-or-less as reference as a portable device can get. But the notion that one has to spend more than $100-150 on a discrete upstream desktop component (DAC or amplifier) is pretty absurd and uncorroborated. In fact there's a wealth of information affirming the converse; i.e. that modern upstream components sound the same.*
*The caveat is the hi-fi theory I opened up with, whereby some manufacturers will play with filtration and impedance (among other decisions of questionable fidelity) to reap "euphonic" results that are actually flavors and distortion of the original signal.
It's curious that hi-fi doesn't really mean "high fidelity" anymore. I'd suppose it started when some brilliant marketer decided that playback should be an art rather than a science -- but in fact all playback can be dictated in scientific terms and measurements.
Edited by 3X0 - 4/11/12 at 10:26ampost #8854 of 91414/11/12 at 11:47am- kiwirugby
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 1,569 Posts. Joined 7/2003
- Location: Southern California
- Select All Posts By This User
iPod Classic (lossless) > CLAS Solo > Pico Slim > 13s
post #8855 of 91414/11/12 at 1:32pm- dallan
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 6,312 Posts. Joined 6/2007
- Location: Santa Monica, California
- Select All Posts By This User
To me the difference was apparent even when going from the fuse to an ipod classic with lod. My daughter swearas by her ipod and skullcandy iems so if you are used to your setup and you like it go for it. For me the sound of the sansa is flat and in no way nuetral . But it is cheap, that's why many people get them. I am considered out of my mind to have a pair of thousand dollar iem and there are many that claim they aren't nuetrald either. I k.ow what I like though and haven't changed my portable set up in a few years.
Sorry about disjointed post, pecking on cellphone
post #8856 of 91414/11/12 at 2:20pmWhen you guys refer to the iPod classic is it the imod version or just the default one?post #8857 of 91414/11/12 at 3:00pm- nc8000
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 4,004 Posts. Joined 4/2007
- Location: Kalundborg, Denmark
- Select All Posts By This User
The iMod is always before Classicpost #8858 of 91414/11/12 at 3:10pmSo, many of you guys are just using the default ipod classic 5.5 gen?
post #8859 of 91414/11/12 at 3:14pm- nc8000
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 4,004 Posts. Joined 4/2007
- Location: Kalundborg, Denmark
- Select All Posts By This User
5.5 was before the Classic (Classic is 6th and 7th gen). I'm using a Classic (7th gen) and a Touch (2nd gen). Years ago I had the original iMod (the one where the caps were internal and the headphone out got converted to a line out).post #8860 of 91414/11/12 at 4:51pm- Eric_C
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 2,951 Posts. Joined 1/2010
- Location: Singapore
- Select All Posts By This User
Yeah, if we meant iMod we would have said iMod; I've never seen someone say "iPod classic" when they actually meant an iMod.
Also curious that you assume 5.5 gen is the "default". I think we're up to 7th gen now? Mine is 6th, fwiw.post #8861 of 91414/11/12 at 5:56pmWhen i mean default, i am referring to the normal version without any form of upgrades or improvements whatsoever(eg rockbox or iMod). Usage of default would be in the context of default password, default gateway ip etc.
post #8862 of 91414/11/12 at 6:03pm- Eric_C
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 2,951 Posts. Joined 1/2010
- Location: Singapore
- Select All Posts By This User
Yes, well, you're also assigning a particular generation in the Classic line-up to "default" status, which is an odd use of the term. Anyway, round these parts people are more likely to say "unmodded" instead of "default".
post #8863 of 91414/11/12 at 7:57pm- dallan
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 6,312 Posts. Joined 6/2007
- Location: Santa Monica, California
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:Originally Posted by 3X0
Well, the beauty of hi-fi upstream gear is that they're rated on their ability to make the signal sound artificially delicious. So to an extent, you are getting something for your money -- but again, this is much more efficiently achieved (in both performance and dollar terms) by means of software (or hardware) equalization.Of course the Clip+ isn't a holy grail and not reference in the grand scheme of things -- I should have specified that it is more-or-less as reference as a portable device can get. But the notion that one has to spend more than $100-150 on a discrete upstream desktop component (DAC or amplifier) is pretty absurd and uncorroborated. In fact there's a wealth of information affirming the converse; i.e. that modern upstream components sound the same.*
As reference as a portable device can get.....the Clip?? Guess alot of folks out here waist their money on the external devices for the ipods now by fostex or the solo trying to get reference that they could have for under $50. All modern upsteam components sound the same??? What information, I have heard tons of different upstream combo, they all sound different! Where are you hearing this stuff?
Okay, well i see you don't believe in dac's either, okay-per your profile. Artificially delicious..... Many people who I trust and the best setups that i have heard have dac's or extremely high end cd players. Like i said to each his own, but a couple of meets sure did open my eyes throughout the years and the claim of a "euphoric sound" and not a reference sound is like whistling in the dark.
I am not on here too much lately and after already trying that route before finding out for my self, i now see why. Sure I'll get an ear full but hey, your justifications for settling on where you are are just that. Sometimes these statements just blow me off my chair, that is why so many of the audiophiles don't even bother posting out here anymore, just don't want to have to argue for something that they have already figured out.
post #8864 of 91414/11/12 at 8:06pm- Eric_C
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 2,951 Posts. Joined 1/2010
- Location: Singapore
- Select All Posts By This User
^ Um, but you'd only be able to tell whether a piece of gear is not euphonic at all if you can tell whether it's free from colouration. And the only reliable way to check that is with measurements.
Outside of measurements, we're all very susceptible to being tricked or tricking ourselves. So...it's not a knock against whether a "more high end" setup sounds better--that's just up to the individual, and that's completely ok. What's there to get upset about?
post #8865 of 91414/11/12 at 8:23pm- dallan
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- offline
- 6,312 Posts. Joined 6/2007
- Location: Santa Monica, California
- Select All Posts By This User
I do have on euphonic piece of gear that i actually like a lot, it sounds good, but most of my gear is neutral. Not upset just plain baffled. Either there are those who haven't listened to other systems of they just are justifying that they are not willing to spend the money, and some of the stuff is expensive and not worth the cost to all. But i can tell when i put on the O2's out of a blue hawaiian and a fifteen thousand dollar cd player, even though i don't know the cost or the name at the time, that it is clear with no noise level and incredibly dynamic. That's other peoples stuff that i can not afford and don't know what it costs till later. It is not just preference, although some things are, others are just obvious. Upsteam components make all the difference in the world, I had to change stuff like crazy to deal with fatigue at one point and getting rid of the digital etch i got from computer generated audio.
Well good luck with your journey, Eric_C mine finally ended a year or two back on all of this, got it right and knew the next step was to pricey, so just enjoying the music....right now.
Return HomeBack to Forum: Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors- JH Audio JH-13 PRO appreciation thread
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › JH Audio JH-13 PRO appreciation thread - Top Tier Universal Iem Comparison Chart And Information
Recent Discussions
- › Buying portable or in-ear headphones? Seeking guidance? DON'T START... 8 seconds ago
- › The Astell & Kern AK120 21 seconds ago
- › Rate The Last Movie You Watched 28 seconds ago
- › iPhone 5 Audio Quality with headphones? is it better than the... 53 seconds ago
- › Funny comments from the forums. 3 minutes ago
- › 「Official」Asian Anime, Manga, and Music Lounge 3 minutes ago
- › Grado RS1i (2 months old) 4 minutes ago
- › 3.5mm to 6.3mm Cable 5 minutes ago
- › Sennheiser HD650 Appreciation Thread!! 6 minutes ago
- › 50mm driver open air full size cans pop out of nowhere, sound amazing 6 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Schiit Valhalla by Rem0o
- › Sony MDR-XB500 40mm XB Diaphragm Driver Extra Bass Headphones by derbigpr
- › Colorfly Pocket Hi-fi C4 by yxmees
- › audio-technica Premium Compact Inner Ear Headphones ATH-CKN70 Black... by a_recording
- › AUDIO TECHNICA ATH PRO700 mk2 by TheGame21x
- › Monoprice 8320 IEM by Taharqa
- › Fanmusic MS-E1011 by ItsMeHere
- › Audio-gd NFB-5 by citadel
- › HE-5LE by JamesHuntington
- › Kozee Sound Solutions Infinity X2 by Insight Reviews
New Articles
- › Syncing music and making playlists work with... by Currawong
- › Mac OS X Music Players - alternatives to iTunes by miceblue
- › STAX SR-007 (Omega II) ... A Review After 4... by Currawong
- › List of lossless and high-res music (FLAC,... by ffivaz
- › Beware of the following scams and people... by Currawong
- › Sennheiser 449 Mod Possibly 4 8 Mod by hernan604
- › 2012 Head-Fi Holiday Gift Guide (Computer Audio) by joe
- › 2012 Head-Fi Holiday Gift Guide (Portable... by joe
- › 2012 Head-Fi Holiday Gift Guide (Desktop Audio) by joe
- › 2012 Head-Fi Holiday Gift Guide (Headphone... by joe
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2013 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map



















