Clear acrylic paint might do the job. Just be careful not to overdo it.
post #1951 of 8925
7/17/09 at 3:41pm
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
If the 10x3 is supposed to be the competitor to the ES3X then I can say that you're definitely right about the extension. The JH-13 has a more visceral impact to the bass and the soundstage also seems wider and more 3Dish.
|

|
I wonder what might be the difference between the JH 13 and universal IEMs of the likes of ER-4 and Audéo. My modified ER-4P and my Audéo – both exclusively used with the iAudio 7 and carefully equalized by its semi-parametric equalizer – leave barely any wishes to my ears.
What sort of improvement does the JH 13 provide, apart from a more even/extended frequency response? Higher resolution and detail? Less harmonic distortion? BTW, what's the technical justification for a 3-way/6-driver IEM compared to a full-range balanced-armature driver design? (Maybe I should ask the developer; after all Etymotic Research denies a technical advantage, and I''m skeptical as well.) . |
|
Jerry told me that using dual drivers for low/mid/high allows the 13 to output a smooth level without being taxed. This added horsepower combined with the new, faster armatures produces speed that I have yet to hear in any IEM or headphone. Soundstage and decay are also improved thanks to the "more parts doing less work" approach.
The bass response on these provides as visceral a punch as i could imagine would be possible for an IEM. I did a cross-genre listening session late last night and was amazed at how much thump these things could put out. And, for those with UE11 experience, this thump was crystal clear and clean without any bloat or muddiness. I was expecting to hear the speed of the transducers on the high end of the spectrum, but the bass (from mid-bass through the deepest lows) is FAST. |
(My German-related right brain-half has some language difficulties here.)
ala Buffalo32 
