Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › JH Audio JH-13 PRO appreciation thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

JH Audio JH-13 PRO appreciation thread - Page 673

post #10081 of 10094
Good to hear.
post #10082 of 10094
Im sorry guys to repeat myself, but i never got an answer. How long after jh audio receives your impressions do you get a confirmation.
post #10083 of 10094
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3nenbgumi View Post
 

No what I meant was that it was ridiculous for a normal product line like the 13's or the 16's to take nearly as long to manufacture as the notorious Roxanne does. Regarding the Roxanne and the JH13FP, I do believe that some actually prefer the JH13FP to the Roxanne in the clarity department. I have yet to get my pair, but I don't think given the 13s' performance there's currently anything leaps and bounds better than it.

I have to think that the same technicians are working an assembly line that produces both 13's, 16's,... et al - as well as Roxanne's - so any delay in production would affect all products equally - the CF issues notwithstanding - that is another can of worms. So any new project simply gets in a very crowded line.

 

(It always amuses me that there are some that slam JH Audio for their lack of attention and warm fuzzy's to the community as other companies seem to do. Give those companies the same workload and I imagine their response time might lag a bit as well)

post #10084 of 10094
Originally Posted by DrhubblePhd View Post

Im sorry guys to repeat myself, but i never got an answer. How long after jh audio receives your impressions do you get a confirmation.

 

In my case.. I never got a confirmation when they received my impressions.  I just used USPS tracking to confirm that they were delivered.

 

In other news.. my repaired JH13's arrived today.. the included invoice stated the low bass driver was replaced (damn you, Lipton!).  They were only gone a couple of weeks.. but man did I miss them.. such a terrific sounding IEM!

post #10085 of 10094

I had a few refits and I think the second time they gave a confirmation but I can't be completely sure. I used my tracking number as well and gave them 2 weeks before I would call them if necessary. 

 

Flysweep I feel the same way. the JH13 are great iem's and even having newer stuff I always go back to them..well that and the UERM but I need to get those refit by someone eventually if I could ever get impressions.

post #10086 of 10094
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrhubblePhd View Post

Im sorry guys to repeat myself, but i never got an answer. How long after jh audio receives your impressions do you get a confirmation.


I never got one unless I emailed them

 

Heck, on their site it still says "pending" for my orders, but I've got 'em all :P

 

Just give 'em an email, they've always been great at responding to me

post #10087 of 10094
What amps are you guys using the JH13 or JH16 with? I have the ALO RX MK3 but the hiss is kind of starting to be annoying. I've heard good things about the Pico Slim and I'm quite interested in them now. Or do you guys don't use amps with them?
post #10088 of 10094

I just looked up the patent for the FP technology, Is there really a processor inside each ear piece controlling the timing to keep the drivers in phase?

post #10089 of 10094
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilverEars View Post
 

I just looked up the patent for the FP technology, Is there really a processor inside each ear piece controlling the timing to keep the drivers in phase?


LOL processor? What!? FreqPhase as far as I understand is just re-positioning the drivers and altering the bore lengths for each respective driver to make sure they are phase that way. Much more lo-fi and less likely to stuff up.

post #10090 of 10094
Not sure if anyone else has made any comparisons between the jh13fp and the audeze lcd 2.2 with fazor, but i find them to be about as close as an iem and full size can can get.

I was comparing sound signatures and overall presentation between my he-500, hd700, and lcd2.2 and the lcd2.2 is clearly more similar than the other two, particularly in how smooth the frequencies run together, and also regarding the treble response. They are both clear and resolving without the slightest bit of harshness. Very refined in the treble area. The he-500 could even sound somewhat harsh compared to the jh13 and lcd2.2, which is saying something.

I expected the jh13 to be bright compared to the lcd2, but again they were quite similar.
post #10091 of 10094


Something is coming...... cool.gifcool.gif
post #10092 of 10094
Quote:
Originally Posted by scolaiw View Post
 


LOL processor? What!? FreqPhase as far as I understand is just re-positioning the drivers and altering the bore lengths for each respective driver to make sure they are phase that way. Much more lo-fi and less likely to stuff up.

I saw the processor from one of his patents called, "Phase correcting canalphone system and method"  I guess it's not implemented.  Processors now are very small.

 


Edited by SilverEars - 4/17/14 at 5:11pm
post #10093 of 10094
Very interesting! Thanks for sharing. smily_headphones1.gif
post #10094 of 10094

Jerry Harvey is an impressive inventor.  Does anybody know if he was the first to invent crossovers with multiple BA drivers?  I don't know where he learned all this, not sure even if has a EE degree.  It says he became a roadie for a band at the age of 17, and then later moved up to sound engineer, then he solved a problem of stage monitors being too loud. It's a story made for a film.  If he ever gets a bio made, I'll be interesting in reading.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Harvey_(inventor)

 

Look at his patents, and his designs(the concepts used in his designs of a someone with formal technical background), he's a genius.  If he had no formal schooling, he is a real genius! 


Edited by SilverEars - 4/17/14 at 10:32pm
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › JH Audio JH-13 PRO appreciation thread