GS1Ki vs HF-2 vs HF-2 w/GS1Ki bowls
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beagle 
(I moved this inquiry from another HF-2 thread because I thought it belonged in this comparison thread)
I have a couple pairs of extra GS1000 pads on hand so I did a comparison between the HF-2 (using these pads) and the GS1000.
HF-2 w/GS1000 pads: GS1000 bloated mid/upper bass is smoothed out but (predictably) the upper treble is too pronounced, leaving the midrange quite a distance away. Not bad at very low listening levels but above that, the treble stands out to constantly annoy. And of course the GS1000 warmth is absent.
Returning to the GS1000, the bass is more present (too present IMO) and the upper treble toned back down (in comparison). So somewhere in between these is the PS1000!
So IMO, forget about the GS1000 pads on the HF-2. I put the stock bowls back on and the magic returned.
Say, has anyone noticed the wooden "lip" area around the drivers (where you see the drivers glued in) has a much wider diameter than on other Grado's? It's like twice as long from the outer edge of the driver to the edge of the wooden surround. This makes it difficult to get the bowls on and off (and putting the GS1000 pads on was a real task!).
|
I repeated this same test this morning with similar results. However, the difference between my un-broken-in HF-2 with the bowls vs the GS1000 salad bowls wasn't as pronounced as I imagined it would be. One caveat is that I typically listen at relatively low volume levels. I think that partially explains why I seem to be one of the few people still enamored with the GS1Ki signature.
One thing that seemed consistent across the musical spectrum was that the HF-2 sounded a bit more closed AND a bit more engaging than the GS. I realize that sounds a like a contradiction! The GS1Ki has always seemed to me just a touch "light". Despite excellent bass the entire presentation doesn't always feel like it has two feet on the floor. Depending on your sonic preferences this might sound more neutral to you vs the HF-2 (I know, I just used the word "neutral" in the same sentence with GS1Ki). In contrast, the HF-2 (with either set of bowls) seemed a touch heftier, especially through the midrange. Vocals have a bit more chest but at the same time seem a touch more congested.
As Beagle suggested, the salad bowls aren't for you if you listen at what I'd consider more "normal" levels. At the levels I listen with, I might pick up a pair of salad bowls. I did my comparisons before I read Beagle's comments but I totally agree about the treble with the salad bowls. I'll reiterate my observation though - at lower levels the differences between the regular vs salad bowls on the HF-2 were not as large as I expected.
I also don't feel that an HF-2 with salad bowls is "better" or is a replacement for the GS1Ki. They presented very different pictures. Since at least 60% of my music collection is classical/orchestral I'm not sure I'll ever get rid of my GS1Ki. Low volume listening in that genre with the GS is a very special experience for me.
This was done with 840C => WA6SE maxxed w/Sophia.