Dear headfiers, thanks for good and informative discussion. Here are my contributions. I have been using the Korg Mr1 for three months now, recording from my good vinyl rig. My notes are based on the vinyl recording situation, not lacking battery in a live situation, problems with mic, or so on.
My general conclusion is that the Korg is better than any other recording device I have used so far, including a Studer Revox A77, various Sony DAT recorders and a Creative 24/96 sound card.
DSD does have some problems, perhaps a bit of harshness to the sound and a bit of (high frequency related) noise, but these are minor, compared to any other digital alternative I have heard. The DSD recordings bring me closer to the real sound. Broadly speaking, if MP3 gives me 30 percent and CD quality 50, hi-rez PCM gives 60 and DSD gives 70.
This judgement is highly subjective of course, but i think it fits well with the judgement of the market, considering SACD - it just wont die. The Korg Mr1 clearly overperforms for the price.
Usual audiophile logic seems to apply to the device. Better output cables make for better sound. Better input cables too. I use balanced cables and some connectors to minijacks that I bought on the net and modified. Sound would probably improve a bit with better power conditioning (haven't tried) and better damping (tried a bit, can't hear much impact). Like my portable DAT player, the Korg unit seems to be slightly more musical playing back on battery power, but this is a small difference, not sure.
My biggest trouble with the unit is the small hard disk, and advice regarding this is especially welcome. Going to 32 gb is ok, but why not more.
Uncle Eric: agree with your comments on recording as a neglected way to audiophilia.
Podtweaker: my general impression is, dsd is clearly better than the rest. Pcm improves upsampled, but it retains a boxy closed quality compared to dsd. Maybe, because i havent heard expensive pcm dacs (but so what, probably dsd would sound even more glorious, similarly optimized). Also agree with you on benefits amplifying portables like Zune.
Qusp: outboard dac - yes, the Korg Mr1 dac can probably be improved in many ways, but the outboard dac would need to be able to play dsd direct, like the Korg.
Like others on this thread I have no specific noise problems with the recorder.
My general conclusion is that the Korg is better than any other recording device I have used so far, including a Studer Revox A77, various Sony DAT recorders and a Creative 24/96 sound card.
DSD does have some problems, perhaps a bit of harshness to the sound and a bit of (high frequency related) noise, but these are minor, compared to any other digital alternative I have heard. The DSD recordings bring me closer to the real sound. Broadly speaking, if MP3 gives me 30 percent and CD quality 50, hi-rez PCM gives 60 and DSD gives 70.
This judgement is highly subjective of course, but i think it fits well with the judgement of the market, considering SACD - it just wont die. The Korg Mr1 clearly overperforms for the price.
Usual audiophile logic seems to apply to the device. Better output cables make for better sound. Better input cables too. I use balanced cables and some connectors to minijacks that I bought on the net and modified. Sound would probably improve a bit with better power conditioning (haven't tried) and better damping (tried a bit, can't hear much impact). Like my portable DAT player, the Korg unit seems to be slightly more musical playing back on battery power, but this is a small difference, not sure.
My biggest trouble with the unit is the small hard disk, and advice regarding this is especially welcome. Going to 32 gb is ok, but why not more.
Uncle Eric: agree with your comments on recording as a neglected way to audiophilia.
Podtweaker: my general impression is, dsd is clearly better than the rest. Pcm improves upsampled, but it retains a boxy closed quality compared to dsd. Maybe, because i havent heard expensive pcm dacs (but so what, probably dsd would sound even more glorious, similarly optimized). Also agree with you on benefits amplifying portables like Zune.
Qusp: outboard dac - yes, the Korg Mr1 dac can probably be improved in many ways, but the outboard dac would need to be able to play dsd direct, like the Korg.
Like others on this thread I have no specific noise problems with the recorder.










why would I need to do that?? the MR-1 doesnt have digital output, no matter whether you have a dac with DSD or not, you cant get DSD out of the korg. only analogue line-out, I was wondering how people compared the MR-1 plus portable amp to rigs utilizing a good quality portable outboard dac. a rig such as iriver h-120->optical->D10-Lisa III. that was my question. nice to know it does a good job of recording as well. i'm pissed though. I missed those ones for $199 they must've been snapped up by head-fiers because they've put the price up to $250
annoying because I just about pulled the trigger earlier this week, but thought sonce there was 10 of them and they didnt seem to be going anywhere, that they would still have one this week coming. oh well, $250 is still a good deal and i'll just have to live with it. buying one on wednesday.



