Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Ears on with CrossRoads Quattro
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Ears on with CrossRoads Quattro

post #1 of 15
Thread Starter 
Packaging and content.
Packaging is easily accessible and thoughtfully made. Inside the box you’ll find S/M/L/XL and biflange silicone sleeves, three pairs of tuning plates, a zippered soft case and an airlane adapter. All in all a generous amount of accessories, even if there are no foam sleeves or cleaning tool provided.

Build and build quality.
The first thing that strikes you when you see them is how small they are. The housing itself is made of metal, which gives a nice solid feel to it. The lightweight cable is 120cm/47in, and has a 45 degree angle on the jack, it also has a clip to secure the cable to your clothing. Holding the Quattro's you get the feeling of a high quality solid product.

Comfort.
The Quattro’s can be worn either with the cable running straight down or over the ear. The size and the choice of how to wear them combined with the many different included sleeves makes the Quattro’s exceptionally comfortable to wear, you simply forget they are in your ears. Isolation from ambient noise is quite good, the cable suffers from some microphonic noise but this can be minimised with the clip or wearing them over the ear.

What about the sound?
The Quattro’s use a 7mm dynamic driver coupled with a bassport and the tuning plates already mentioned. Sensitivity is stated as approx 95dB/mW and impedance as 16 Ohm, and I can happily say that I can't hear any hissing. I have now put some 40 hours on mine and the bass has settled nicely as well as the highs are opening up more. The tuning plates provide different amounts of warmth to the sound, from the bassy number 1, via the more neutral number 2, to the nearly analytical sounding number 3, or if you are daring you can use them without the plate (just be careful not to get water inside the housing), which makes them sound more like high end open back full size headphones with prominent bass and a very wide soundstage. My personal favourite is to use them without the plate, closely followed by plate 2.
They can produce the full spectrum from hard hitting drums to very expansive and natural sounding guitars and vocals and all the way up to sparkling highs of cymbals.
My all time favourite tracks Hotel California and Comfortably Numb sound simply stunning on the Quattro’s, the dynamics of the recording really comes alive and I can nearly feel the music as well as hear it, the clarity these can maintain while punching deep bass at you is simply breathtaking. I have tried them with a variety of different music styles ranging from rock, electronica, dance music, classical and pop, and from what I can hear they seem to handle what they get thrown at without even breaking sweat. They may not be the most accurate or best suited for critical monitoring or provide the best absolute sound quality out there, but they are really, really good and so involving and fun to listen to. After all, does one go to a concert to dissect and analyse the sound, or to have fun and get involved in the music?

What do I think?
The sound they produce is nothing short of stunning plus it can be tailored to fit the listeners preferences, they have a generous accessory pack included, while design is subjective these really look nice, build quality and the metal housing deserves both thumbs up, they are light and very small and for my ears one of the most comfortable IEM’s I have ever tried.
The main drawback is the lack of availability in local shops, and a cleaning tool would have been handy to include.
Finally, I really can not praise these enough, for the asking price they are very, very good.
LL
LL
LL
LL
post #2 of 15
No no no... I must at least wait to have received the HF5 before ordering anything else, dammit!

Thank you for the review, mp3. A fun-sounding dynamic IEM able to deliver in the bass department may be the best pendant to the Etys, after all.

Could you compare the Quattro (SQ, comfort, isolation) to other IEMs?
post #3 of 15
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sinocelt View Post
Could you compare the Quattro (SQ, comfort, isolation) to other IEMs?
I don't have that many IEM's and none of the highest ranking ones, but I would say they sound like a cleaner and more detailed version of the PortaPro's.They certainly sound better than the low end Shure's and Sennheiser's I've heard, and with the tuning ports you can pretty much get them to sound like you want them to. The word to describe the sound they produce would be, fun or involving.

Comfort is very high, I use either the XL sleeves, for a shallow insertion or the biflanges for deeper insertion. With the XL, I forget about having them in, they are that comfortable and light, certainly better comfort than Shure or Sennheiser.

Isolation is good, with the biflanges they are nearly on par with Shure's and once music starts they block out the noise. Haven't tried them inflight yet, but in 3 weeks time I can get back with that piece of information. They are not as isolating as Ety's, but then again not much is.
post #4 of 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by mp3 View Post
They are not as isolating as Ety's, but then again not much is.
Yeah, from everything I've read, Ety seems the reference in that domain, which is why I finally bought the HF5 (well, that and the $50-off sale). Most of my listening takes place in the bus or the subway, and that's mostly audiobooks.

What Etys don't seem to be, again only from what I've read, is "fun or involving"; and I may like that at the gym. But I really need good isolation there too, because they blast their own music so hard that, last time, I had problems talking to the friend next to me. It was more like a nightclub than a gym.

A nightclub with a horrendous DJ.
post #5 of 15
Thread Starter 
With the biflanges inserted deep, and music playing, I very much doubt you'd hear anything of the gym music. There are Comply foamies to fit them as well, they use the same sleeves as Senn cx300, which probably would offer better isolation.

And they really are fun and involving
post #6 of 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by mp3 View Post
With the biflanges inserted deep, and music playing, I very much doubt you'd hear anything of the gym music. There are Comply foamies to fit them as well, they use the same sleeves as Senn cx300, which probably would offer better isolation.
Foamies + sweat =

I'll have to try something else. Maybe the Head-Direct biflanges: they seal great for me!


Quote:
Originally Posted by mp3 View Post
And they really are fun and involving
*whimpers*

Oh, that wasn't me. That was my wallet.

I'll still wait until I've received the HF5. I've been waiting for them for a couple of months. They should reach me next week. (Pleaaaase!)
post #7 of 15
Thanks for the review. I am waiting for mine to arrive.

Oh, what source are you using with the Quattro?
post #8 of 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by walkingman View Post
Thanks for the review. I am waiting for mine to arrive.
Thanks for the information. We are waiting for your review.
post #9 of 15
I had a chance to try it few weeks ago. As for me quality-per-price always the measurement. In this case it is far exceeding the normal ratio because Quattro only asks very little money but provides high quality sound. Specially its generous bundled accessories.

I own SE530 and TF10P so I am a bit biased to sound from these phone. Surprisingly sound from Quattro with tune plate no. 1 & 2 really good for me. But I love no.1 the most as it provides good clarity and good bass. Tune plate no.3 provides too much bass for me.

If comfort is the key, Quattro lacks of nothing but pleasant to wear for long hours. Just a little bit to remind, the wearing is slight different from other IEM. Quattro can go really deep inside your ear canal because its size.

FYI, I tried the Quattro with iMod + Voyager + ALO iMod silver&copper cable.

post #10 of 15
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by walkingman View Post
what source are you using with the Quattro?
I'm using a Cowon D2, with D2+ FW, and a Sansa Clip. They sound very good on both, but I would give the Clip a slight upper hand.

Napsack, not to confuse anybody, the most bassy is 1, 2 is more neutral and 3 has rolled off bass. How would you say they compare to the 530's?

Sinocelt, did I mention how much fun these are to listen to, and how very involving they are?
post #11 of 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by mp3 View Post
Sinocelt, did I mention how much fun these are to listen to, and how very involving they are?
Aaaaah! So cruel! So cruel! I. Want. My. Toys!
post #12 of 15
I got my pair of Quattro this noon and so far the sound give a good impression. Main cons with this IEM so far is cable. It's similar to Mylar X3 cable and among the most microphonic cable i ever experienced. It retains some shape too after being coiled.

Gonna write a short impression once it burned in for 100+hours.
post #13 of 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by mp3 View Post
Napsack, not to confuse anybody, the most bassy is 1, 2 is more neutral and 3 has rolled off bass. How would you say they compare to the 530's?
Oops, I might be wrong with no. of tune plate .

Quattro is a really good affordable IEM. But if have to compare with 530, Quattro is probably quite behind the 530 in term of SQ and sound reproduction which is foreseeable by price tag of the two. Experts would say, it's different kettle of fish.
post #14 of 15
Thread Starter 
True, it's not really fair to compare a product with another product that costs nearly three times as much, I was just curious as to SQ comparison.
post #15 of 15
Thread Starter 
Approx 100 hours burn in.
They are now nicely settled and the highs have opened up, while the bass is nice and tight. Paired with my Sansa Clip without EQ'ing they sound very beefy and still have good detail and airy feel to the mids and highs.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Portable Headphones, Earphones and In-Ear Monitors › Ears on with CrossRoads Quattro