Probably due to the fact that the different players don't assign the same sets of functions that their USB sections will control.
post #286 of 619
6/4/09 at 10:54am
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
pocket LOL; I dont think you've seen my rig; well at least my topflight rig. besides, its easy to skip tracks blind, but how about navigating to playlists etc or touchscreens LOL.
as for the hifiman; as always, i'm still very interested in the product; dont get me wrong on that. though for me the OPA627 is overrated and overpriced.b so i'd be interested in other amp modules. I think its great that Fang is doing this; as the community has been asking for something like this for a while now. to me the best thing about this idea is the fact that it can be upgraded. if a new amp module is developed, you can buy it and slot it in; if you use IEMs and prefer less power and a lower noise floor; that can be accommodated with a different amp module too. the problem of trying to produce an all in one unit that is 'the best' of everything, is of course the fact that everyone has their own ideas of what that is. |
|
Sorry, but I don't really get why this is'nt just a player w/ a high quality line out section. Does anyone expect a high end CD or SACD player to have amplification beyond a line level signal. No, that's not a high quality player's job, unnecessary circuitry as far as I'm concerned.
|
|
I think you've missed the point - a high end CD/SACD player at home can be connected to large, high end amplifiers since you don't have to lug the thing around.
That's a problem with using an iMod/iHP-140 etc - you see these huge "portable" rigs with 2 or 3 devices with large interconnects held together with a band to make up for the poor headphone outputs of the player itself and trying to squeeze the best sound possible out of it. Correct me if I'm wrong but it seems the aim of this player is to get rid of the need for separate devices by having a player that sounds very good/amazing while being sensible in it's dimensions and having the upgradability there with it's changable amp module. And even then, it has a very good line out anyway from all of the reports, what's the problem? It IS the no frills high quality player you want, I don't see the problem... |
|
@ qusp,
I am going to send some members over to you to learn the art of "multi-quoting ![]() ![]() |
i'm not sure how much those with smaller screens like my multi-quoting though, better then seeing my sig over and over again though....|
Originally Posted by rebski
No, not in the slightest. A direct informed response is to be respected and appreciated.
I don’t see you are not agreeing with my ideas, more like undermining them by inference. |
| That is your choice. Apple might consider it not to be necessary for normal usage. |
|
Originally Posted by prone2phone
i dont understand why noone can make just some software tweek for mp3 players to work as a usb line out
|
| what am I undermining by the way?? your wish for a direct line to fang and his production line?? |
|
Good points everyone.
Something that may help with the "size thing" would be a full-display remote control about the size of a Sansa Clip. This way, the player could be controlled (music selection, volume change, etc.) while it is safely tucked away inside a hip pack/backpack/messenger bag. Also, a custom leather case, with contol cutouts, would be a nice touch at this price. Thoughts? |
|
well there is more to this as well; most USB dacs are powered over the USB line, exactly how long do you think the battery on a dap would last if it was also powering an outboard dac?? it would seem on the surface to be an easy thing, but there are other factors that must be taken into account. you would think that it would be easy enough to wrote a piece of software in ipod linux to enable a jailbroken iphone or touch to send i2S over usb; but it is not that simple; even if the right calls could be made, the dac would have to be under its own power and also need to know the encoding that apple places on its i2s.
|
|
Stop being stupid. I have never initiated any feature requests. On the contrary I have expressed contentment with whatever features Nankai chooses.
What I did was to respond to the invitation to do so by this post Or haven’t you bothered to read this thread? |

|
Ah, I remember now I did hear the hifiman at canjam, plus the prototype orthodynamics (which were very promising) - yeah, it's very nice indeed, and it's only now I realise I could really be into this to replace the damned ipod when driving my car! I wasn't that taken by the Pico though I didn't A/B or anything.
FLAC support is compelling. I could care less about ALAC. On the subject of extra features, yes, some kind of dongle for menu control and whatnot would be awesome, truly killer, for driving. Dunno if anyone's answered this but...any playlist support? |
| I will admit to being a bit provocative |
