Quote:
Originally Posted by abellaw 
Bilavideo i definitely agree with what you are saying in principle, i would even go as far as to say you might want to miss getting a portable amp and get the best desktop amp you can afford. You will definitely notice an improvement in your headphones, in general they sound tighter and more controlled.
However the amps i have used with my SR-80's have not blown me away, i notice an improvement but nothing to write home about so to speak. Out of curiosity what amp(s) do you use with your SR-80's
|
The cheaper amps won't blow you away. At the lower end, you're mostly getting more volume, which is helpful when the sound card on your computer is pure crap and you're trying to watch an instant film on Netflix.
The Shangri La of amplification is a "flat" one-to-one amplification of all frequencies simultaneously, which is why so many purists denigrate any pretended coloration of the sound, including bass boost, as distortion by design. But amplification is not equal across the frequency spectrum. It's not flat to begin with. The cheap amps, like the cheap headphones, amplify what they want to amplify. In many instances, the mere use of an input capacitor acts as a high-pass filter, affecting amplification of bass. This is not unlike the use of capacitors in passive crossovers on many sound systems. Not surprisingly, you get high frequencies, but the bass feels tinny, and that's before you pick up dc offset, etc.
While the sky is not the limit - and this is an industry permeated by a mixture of fanboy lust and predatory hype - amplification is, at root, a form of sound processing. Without care to such things as buffering, the end result is far from ideal. Reliable resistors and capacitors, and sufficiently complex signal processing, you get uncontrolled and botched amplification.
Grados don't attempt to provide a "flat" response. The trademark sound - which varies across the product line - emphasizes certain frequencies. Grados are known for the emphasis on midrange, which is nice once you get used to the sound. It's where so much detail hides. But that's precisely why amplification needs to focus, as much, on what you don't want to amplify as well as what may drop out of the picture without a little help.
On my SR-80s (which I listen to less now that I have the woodies: RS-1 and GS-1000), I went for a good while without any amp at all. Then I used the Cmoy, which wasn't spectacular using either the Opa 2227 or the LM4562 chips (too boring). I got into opamp rolling, started buying SOIC 8s and, after much effort, finally learned to solder those tiny ticks onto Brown Dog adapters (Thank you, Radio Shack, for the magnifying glass and alligator-clip work station). Even though it seemed counterintuitive to do so, I found the Analog Devices chips more interesting (bright on bright?) - so, while I admit the sonic merits of the 627BP, I actually prefer the AD8599, which is not just cheaper; it exposes details that are truly cool.
I didn't get the bass I was looking for till I got my M^3, which is not so portable, which is why I've held onto my portable Pimeta.