Can you or Vinnie run some benchmarks on battery life while driving a 600 ohm load at reasonably full listening levels? That would be very much appreciated...
post #91 of 237
5/9/09 at 4:38am
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Perhaps. But he is bringing up valid observations related to the design and engineering expended on this product. I don't see a problem with anyone commenting on reviews; in fact, I think it is a practice that should be encouraged, whether positive or negative. Had it been an amp with a modest casing, etc. and selling for a commensurate price, I doubt anyone would have expended the efforts. Including the review efforts... I chuckle everytime I think of someone doing this to review a Cmoy
. Or... would it? Remember that designing per a datasheet will not hold up as IP. Obscuring chip markings, etc. is a pretty lame attempt/excuse at preserving IP. And yes, I believe there have been instances of designs being ripped off for commercial purposes. |
|
Can you or Vinnie run some benchmarks on battery life while driving a 600 ohm load at reasonably full listening levels? That would be very much appreciated...
|

|
I don't think that Skylab has anything to gain from posting that he likes this amp. And I do want one because they are pretty, and with the $150 or so per pair input caps on this, expensive jacks, casework, and volume knob, I can see where the money goes, it's a luxury product.
That being said, I feel the same way about having difficulty trusting RWA and a teeny circuit board for a headphone amp being called as good as full blown amp designs - a huge home amp from Singlepower being in the same league as this is hard to believe. That freaked me out a bit when I heard it. But Skylab and Headphoneaddict have mountains of gear and experience under their belt and I want to trust them. I know that Vinnie can design some really good circuits, but with audio guts it's like being at a restaurant, you are more likely to want to go for the big portion, in the US bigger is often perceived as better for everything. Sure, taking stuff out of the signal path gives a purer sound, that's why lots of people say simplicity is good and why lots of people like the Grado RA-1. That being said, this amp with its 9V battery probably is based off an op amp design, so I fail to see how it will sound greatly different from a CMOY although the high quality pot, jacks, and input caps are going to help and hard wiring it to an iMod like that is a good call. I still want one of these, because it's sexy. I just have trust issues. |
|
I don't think that Skylab has anything to gain from posting that he likes this amp. And I do want one because they are pretty, and with the $150 or so per pair input caps on this, expensive jacks, casework, and volume knob, I can see where the money goes, it's a luxury product.
That being said, I feel the same way about having difficulty trusting RWA and a teeny circuit board for a headphone amp being called as good as full blown amp designs - a huge home amp from Singlepower being in the same league as this is hard to believe. That freaked me out a bit when I heard it. But Skylab and Headphoneaddict have mountains of gear and experience under their belt and I want to trust them. I know that Vinnie can design some really good circuits, but with audio guts it's like being at a restaurant, you are more likely to want to go for the big portion, in the US bigger is often perceived as better for everything. Sure, taking stuff out of the signal path gives a purer sound, that's why lots of people say simplicity is good and why lots of people like the Grado RA-1. That being said, this amp with its 9V battery probably is based off an op amp design, so I fail to see how it will sound greatly different from a CMOY although the high quality pot, jacks, and input caps are going to help and hard wiring it to an iMod like that is a good call. I still want one of these, because it's sexy. I just have trust issues. |
|
Comparing how much they charge for their products compared to the cost of parts would be one good starting point to understand the animosity.
|
|
OK, thank you for that. But I fail to understand this engendering animosity, on two levels. First, ALO is in business to make money, and should be allowed to do so - they are not a charity. SOME profit expectation is fair and reasonable.
But second, are you sure that their markups are even unreasonable? I look at the Amphora and I see at least $600-700 of parts cost. Of course, nice chassis-mounted gold jacks (which benefit the sonics IMO) and a wood chassis (which doesn't) are part of the cost, but as stated before, the VCaps and Pot alone probably represent $400 in parts cost. And ALO is not a high-volume operation and likely pays about the same for parts that you or I would. If they cannot make a couple hundred dollars on a thousand dollar amp, why would they even bother to produce the thing in the first place? On the other hand, if you can convince me that the parts cost on the Amphora is really $300, then I will agree with you they should sell if for cheaper. |