So much is made of what a given manufacturer "should" charge for products. The beauty of a free market is that they can charge whatever they want for a product and people will either buy it or they won't. The argument also seems to always be made in terms of cost of goods sold versus asking price, i.e. "it's $10 worth of parts so it shouldn't sell for any more than $20". Where's overhead? Where's opportunity cost? Where's cost of capital?
Finally, what's a fair profit margin? The profit margin on an average pair of sneakers that most of would buy for the gym is astronomical when factored only on the cost of production. What about a bottle of Coke using the same method?
This is like the wooden box discussion in the PS1000 thread. Grado gets points off for not putting them in the wood box and ALO is getting points off for putting the Amphora in a wood box.
I don't get tired of the argument, I only get tired of people asserting that someone else is in error purchasing a product because it doesn't meet their own standard for value.
Finally, what's a fair profit margin? The profit margin on an average pair of sneakers that most of would buy for the gym is astronomical when factored only on the cost of production. What about a bottle of Coke using the same method?
This is like the wooden box discussion in the PS1000 thread. Grado gets points off for not putting them in the wood box and ALO is getting points off for putting the Amphora in a wood box.
I don't get tired of the argument, I only get tired of people asserting that someone else is in error purchasing a product because it doesn't meet their own standard for value.









I had to sell my civility, intellect, and style in order to afford some new toys. Guess I will not be able to comment anymore!
As far as being a shill, well I am one ... of anything that sounds good I will say it to the four winds. So sue me if I get excited of something that sounds this good.

